The challenge of measuring physical activity
Measuring physical activity accurately and reliably is essential when physical activity is either an intervention or an outcome measure. Measurement of physical activity in population groups has been undertaken in a number of ways, including self-report, observation, heart rate measurement and ac...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English English |
| Published: |
Nutrition Society of Malaysia
2008
|
| Online Access: | http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/6726/1/The%20challenge%20of%20measuring%20physical%20activity.pdf http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/6726/ http://www.nutriweb.org.my/publications/mjn0014_2/supplement.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Measuring physical activity accurately and reliably is essential when physical activity is
either an intervention or an outcome measure. Measurement of physical activity in population
groups has been undertaken in a number of ways, including self-report, observation, heart rate
measurement and activity monitors. The strengths and weaknesses of each of these methods will
be reviewed. The measurement of physical activity in children is an additional challenge and data
from the recently completed pilot study of the Kajian Aktiviti Fizikal dan Sukan Pelajar Sekolah Malaysia
2008 (KAFS08) will be used to illustrate these complexities. Questionnaire and activity monitoring
data were collected from 163 children attending four schools in Kuala Lumpur with an age range
of 9-18 years. Three models of activity monitors were used (YAMAX SW-700, OMRON HJ113,
ACTIGRAPH GT1M) and on completion of data collection, significant differences were found
between pedometer steps recorded on each monitor, after allowing for age and gender differences.
A subsequent study on the differences between the three monitors was undertaken involving over
15 individuals and over 40 days of measurement where one individual wore each of the three
monitors for a full day. In addition, the accuracy of each monitor was determined by comparing
the step count registered by the monitor with actual number of steps counted.
|
|---|