Instructional leadership: validity and reliability of PIMRS 22-item instrument

Background: Instructional leaders are responsible for organizing, creating, and ensuring a positive attitude toward change. This role is very important for ensuring the success of any reforms. Objective: The main objective of this paper is to establish the validity and reliability of the twenty-two...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abdul Aziz, Nor Azni, Foo, Say Fooi, Hassan, Aminuddin, Asimiran, Soaib
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American-Eurasian Network for Scientific Information 2014
Online Access:http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/59557/1/Instructional%20leadership%20validity%20and%20reliability%20of%20PIMRS%2022-item%20instrument.pdf
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/59557/
http://ajbasweb.com/old/Ajbas_Special13-IPN%20Bandung_2014.html
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background: Instructional leaders are responsible for organizing, creating, and ensuring a positive attitude toward change. This role is very important for ensuring the success of any reforms. Objective: The main objective of this paper is to establish the validity and reliability of the twenty-two item version of the “Principal Instructional Management Rating Scale” (PIMRS-22) instrument to measure the level of instructional leadership behaviors of principals in implementing the educational policy change of School-Based Assessment (SBA). This twenty-two item instrument was developed by Hallinger (2013) and is based on the Instructional Leadership Model which included three dimensions; determine school mission, management of an instructional program, and creating a learning culture within a school. This instrument was validated by experts and its reliability tested within a pilot study conducted with a total of 60 teachers from 3 secondary schools. Results: The overall reliability coefficient of this instrument was determined to be .94. The determination of school mission had a coefficient of .85, the management of the instructional program .88, and the creation of a learning climate .90. Conclusion: Based on the Cronbach alpha coefficient results, this instrument has content validity, as well as good reliability for quantitatively measuring instructional leadership qualities of principals when implementing educational reform.