A systematic review on repetition rate of routine digital radiography

Background: Repetition of radiograph is a critical event in routine digital radiography. High repetition rate also consumes equipment life time, increases operational cost, decreases patient satisfaction, increase world load and dose of radiation to the professionals. Objective: This article aims to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Almalki, Abdullah A., Abdul Manaf, Rosliza, Juni, Muhamad Hanafiah, Kadir @ Shahar, Hayati, Mohd Noor, Noramaliza, Gabbad, Abdelsafi Abbas Mohammed
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: International Journal of Current Research 2017
Online Access:http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/56756/1/A%20systematic%20review%20on%20repetition%20rate%20of%20routine%20digital%20radiography.pdf
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/56756/
http://www.journalcra.com/article/systematic-review-repetition-rate-routine-digital-radiography
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.upm.eprints.56756
record_format eprints
spelling my.upm.eprints.567562017-08-04T09:35:14Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/56756/ A systematic review on repetition rate of routine digital radiography Almalki, Abdullah A. Abdul Manaf, Rosliza Juni, Muhamad Hanafiah Kadir @ Shahar, Hayati Mohd Noor, Noramaliza Gabbad, Abdelsafi Abbas Mohammed Background: Repetition of radiograph is a critical event in routine digital radiography. High repetition rate also consumes equipment life time, increases operational cost, decreases patient satisfaction, increase world load and dose of radiation to the professionals. Objective: This article aims to review published literature on the repetition rate of digital radiography including its associated factors, reporting, and interventions. Methods: English articles in ScienceDirect, Pub-MED, CINAHL and Medline from 2009 to January 2016 were reviewed using key words of “repetition rate” or “digital radiography”. Inclusion criteria were studies in full free text, studies conducted in routine, conventional, or digital radiography, and focussed on repetition rate measurements. Studies conducted on other branches of diagnostic imaging department, as well as studies carried out on diseases, radiological equipment and radiation protection were not included. Results: After removal of duplicated studies, a total of 37 articles were selected, the full text were read, and seven studies fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria, of which four were intervention and three cross-sectional studies. The repetition rate reported in the studies ranged from 4.9% to 15.5%. Conclusion: Seven studies conducted all over the world imply the existing issue of repetition rate measurement and its analysis. The interventions studies are statistically significant. Interventions were almost technical. In addition, positioning errors were the main causes of repetition in the most studies which imply that radiographers are playing important role in repetition. International Journal of Current Research 2017 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/56756/1/A%20systematic%20review%20on%20repetition%20rate%20of%20routine%20digital%20radiography.pdf Almalki, Abdullah A. and Abdul Manaf, Rosliza and Juni, Muhamad Hanafiah and Kadir @ Shahar, Hayati and Mohd Noor, Noramaliza and Gabbad, Abdelsafi Abbas Mohammed (2017) A systematic review on repetition rate of routine digital radiography. International Journal of Current Research, 9 (2). pp. 46325-46330. ISSN 0975-833X http://www.journalcra.com/article/systematic-review-repetition-rate-routine-digital-radiography
institution Universiti Putra Malaysia
building UPM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Putra Malaysia
content_source UPM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://psasir.upm.edu.my/
language English
description Background: Repetition of radiograph is a critical event in routine digital radiography. High repetition rate also consumes equipment life time, increases operational cost, decreases patient satisfaction, increase world load and dose of radiation to the professionals. Objective: This article aims to review published literature on the repetition rate of digital radiography including its associated factors, reporting, and interventions. Methods: English articles in ScienceDirect, Pub-MED, CINAHL and Medline from 2009 to January 2016 were reviewed using key words of “repetition rate” or “digital radiography”. Inclusion criteria were studies in full free text, studies conducted in routine, conventional, or digital radiography, and focussed on repetition rate measurements. Studies conducted on other branches of diagnostic imaging department, as well as studies carried out on diseases, radiological equipment and radiation protection were not included. Results: After removal of duplicated studies, a total of 37 articles were selected, the full text were read, and seven studies fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria, of which four were intervention and three cross-sectional studies. The repetition rate reported in the studies ranged from 4.9% to 15.5%. Conclusion: Seven studies conducted all over the world imply the existing issue of repetition rate measurement and its analysis. The interventions studies are statistically significant. Interventions were almost technical. In addition, positioning errors were the main causes of repetition in the most studies which imply that radiographers are playing important role in repetition.
format Article
author Almalki, Abdullah A.
Abdul Manaf, Rosliza
Juni, Muhamad Hanafiah
Kadir @ Shahar, Hayati
Mohd Noor, Noramaliza
Gabbad, Abdelsafi Abbas Mohammed
spellingShingle Almalki, Abdullah A.
Abdul Manaf, Rosliza
Juni, Muhamad Hanafiah
Kadir @ Shahar, Hayati
Mohd Noor, Noramaliza
Gabbad, Abdelsafi Abbas Mohammed
A systematic review on repetition rate of routine digital radiography
author_facet Almalki, Abdullah A.
Abdul Manaf, Rosliza
Juni, Muhamad Hanafiah
Kadir @ Shahar, Hayati
Mohd Noor, Noramaliza
Gabbad, Abdelsafi Abbas Mohammed
author_sort Almalki, Abdullah A.
title A systematic review on repetition rate of routine digital radiography
title_short A systematic review on repetition rate of routine digital radiography
title_full A systematic review on repetition rate of routine digital radiography
title_fullStr A systematic review on repetition rate of routine digital radiography
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review on repetition rate of routine digital radiography
title_sort systematic review on repetition rate of routine digital radiography
publisher International Journal of Current Research
publishDate 2017
url http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/56756/1/A%20systematic%20review%20on%20repetition%20rate%20of%20routine%20digital%20radiography.pdf
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/56756/
http://www.journalcra.com/article/systematic-review-repetition-rate-routine-digital-radiography
_version_ 1643836285467492352
score 13.211869