On the current agile assessment methods and approaches
Agile methods are widely used in software companies in recent years. Many software companies are replacing their traditional development methods with Agile methods. Nonetheless, measuring agility that they have achieved has be topic of debate. So far, only a few methods and tools have been proposed...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Conference or Workshop Item |
Language: | English |
Published: |
IEEE
2014
|
Online Access: | http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/48023/1/On%20the%20current%20agile%20assessment%20methods%20and%20approaches.pdf http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/48023/ |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
my.upm.eprints.48023 |
---|---|
record_format |
eprints |
spelling |
my.upm.eprints.480232016-08-03T04:36:48Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/48023/ On the current agile assessment methods and approaches Nafchi, Mina Ziaei Zulzalil, Hazura Gandomani, Taghi Javdani Agile methods are widely used in software companies in recent years. Many software companies are replacing their traditional development methods with Agile methods. Nonetheless, measuring agility that they have achieved has be topic of debate. So far, only a few methods and tools have been proposed to measure the agility of software companies who are moving to agile. The main aim of this paper is reviewing the existing agile assessment methods and providing a brief discussion on drawbacks of these methods. This paper tries to elucidate the actual position of these methods in measuring agility degree of companies who are moving to agile approach. IEEE 2014 Conference or Workshop Item PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/48023/1/On%20the%20current%20agile%20assessment%20methods%20and%20approaches.pdf Nafchi, Mina Ziaei and Zulzalil, Hazura and Gandomani, Taghi Javdani (2014) On the current agile assessment methods and approaches. In: 8th Malaysian Software Engineering Conference (MySEC 2014), 23-24 Sept. 2014, Langkawi, Kedah. (pp. 251-254). 10.1109/MySec.2014.6986023 |
institution |
Universiti Putra Malaysia |
building |
UPM Library |
collection |
Institutional Repository |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Malaysia |
content_provider |
Universiti Putra Malaysia |
content_source |
UPM Institutional Repository |
url_provider |
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/ |
language |
English |
description |
Agile methods are widely used in software companies in recent years. Many software companies are replacing their traditional development methods with Agile methods. Nonetheless, measuring agility that they have achieved has be topic of debate. So far, only a few methods and tools have been proposed to measure the agility of software companies who are moving to agile. The main aim of this paper is reviewing the existing agile assessment methods and providing a brief discussion on drawbacks of these methods. This paper tries to elucidate the actual position of these methods in measuring agility degree of companies who are moving to agile approach. |
format |
Conference or Workshop Item |
author |
Nafchi, Mina Ziaei Zulzalil, Hazura Gandomani, Taghi Javdani |
spellingShingle |
Nafchi, Mina Ziaei Zulzalil, Hazura Gandomani, Taghi Javdani On the current agile assessment methods and approaches |
author_facet |
Nafchi, Mina Ziaei Zulzalil, Hazura Gandomani, Taghi Javdani |
author_sort |
Nafchi, Mina Ziaei |
title |
On the current agile assessment methods and approaches |
title_short |
On the current agile assessment methods and approaches |
title_full |
On the current agile assessment methods and approaches |
title_fullStr |
On the current agile assessment methods and approaches |
title_full_unstemmed |
On the current agile assessment methods and approaches |
title_sort |
on the current agile assessment methods and approaches |
publisher |
IEEE |
publishDate |
2014 |
url |
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/48023/1/On%20the%20current%20agile%20assessment%20methods%20and%20approaches.pdf http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/48023/ |
_version_ |
1643834051713302528 |
score |
13.211869 |