Unconscionability and the clash between contractual justice and freedom of contract in Malaysia
Malaysian courts apply conventional principles in determining cases involving contract law. They tend to emphasise the importance of form and procedure over substance and are inclined to enforce a contract as long as it satisfies the basic requirements of validity. The courts are averse to interveni...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Abdullah, Mohd Faiz, Ab Rahman, Rozanah |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Billion Brains
2011
|
Online Access: | http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/22813/1/Unconscionability%20and%20the%20clash%20between%20contractual%20justice%20and%20freedom%20of%20contract%20in%20Malaysia.pdf http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/22813/ http://www.wjsspapers.com/previous_issue/November/2011 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Unconscionable Contracts: The Courts’ Approach Towards Substantive Fairness
by: Hj Ahmad Shariff, Nurretina, et al.
Published: (2003) -
Inequality of bargaining power and the doctrine of unconscionability: Towards substantive fairness in commercial contracts
by: Alias, Siti Aliza, et al.
Published: (2012) -
Unconscionability in the Law and Practice of Franchising
by: Mohd Ishan, Zahira
Published: (2008) -
Unconscionable call of performance bond
by: Wan Nik, Wan Noor Solehha
Published: (2013) -
Contractual justice in Asean: a comparative view of coercion
by: Shaik Mohd. Hussain, Shaik Md. Noor Alam
Published: (2002)