Development of games-based mobile learning model to teach arithmetic at an elementary school in Saudi Arabia
Mathematics teaching and learning is an essential component of the modern educational system. Despite its immense significance, Saudi primary and secondary schools' performance in mathematics has been notably underwhelming. The aim of this study therefore was to design and develop a teaching...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Thesis |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/104614/1/ALKHALDI%2C%20IBRAHIM-%20IR.pdf http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/104614/ |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Mathematics teaching and learning is an essential component of the modern educational
system. Despite its immense significance, Saudi primary and secondary schools'
performance in mathematics has been notably underwhelming. The aim of this study
therefore was to design and develop a teaching model that is based on activities for the
teaching of arithmetic at the elementary school level. The study was based on Design
and Development Research (DDR) proposed by Richey and Klein (2007, 2013) which
consists of three phases. Under the Phase 1, needs analysis was conducted through
qualitative semi-structured interviews with 16 elementary mathematics teachers
particularly teaching under the Saudi system of education. The data collected for the
three phases were analysed through thematic analysis and fuzzy Delphi methods. The
fuzzy Delphi involved the calculation of the threshold value, ‘d’ in order to establish
experts’ consensus on all questionnaire items. In addition, defuzzification values were
also generated in order to establish experts’ agreement. In accordance with the three
phases, the findings of Phase 1 indicated that the elementary mathematics teachers
opined that there are problems with the current methods employed in teaching arithmetic
at the elementary school level and that employing technology in the form games-based
mobile learning will solve issues and problems currently faced in teaching arithmetic at
the elementary school level. Phase 2 findings were based on what was gathered from the
experts during the NGT sessions that led to the finalization, prioritization and the ranking
of the teaching activities. The findings also led to the classification of the activities into
four domains, namely introductory domain, contents domain, technology domain, and
evaluation domain. As for the findings of FDM Phase 2, the experts reached an overall
consensual agreement (d = 93.5) regarding their views on the selected teaching activities
(Amax12.867), experts’ views on the classification of the teaching activities
(Amax13.200), experts’ views on the teaching activities under the introductory domain
(Amax12.733), experts’ views on activities classified as contents domain (Amax13.133),
experts’ views on the activities classified as technology domain (Amax 12.733), experts’
views on the activities classified as evaluation domain (Amax 13.133). Similarly, the
experts who participated at the evaluation phase also consensually reached an agreement
among them (d = 93.4). The findings showed that the defuzzification value obtained
exceeded the minimum value of 10.5 with the experts' agreement on the domain
classification of games-based mobile learning of the obtaining the average
defuzzification value (Amax13.100) more than the minimum value of 10.5. The findings
of the second aspect of the evaluation questionnaire indicated that the average
defuzzification value obtained by the items was (Amax13.126) also more than the
minimum value of 10.5. Findings of the study have some far-reaching implications which
include the use of both formal classroom teaching and informal learning to help students
achieve their learning objectives. In addition, by combining the all the theories adopted
and methodological choices made by this study, the findings also have some theoretical
and methodological implications including combining all different methodological
choices in achieving the study's objectives. |
---|