Challenges in claiming under the doctrine of privity contract in Malaysia: the issue of halal
The doctrine of privity provides that only the contracting parties to a contract incur rights and obligations under the contract. Third parties cannot sue or be sued under a contract. Thus, if a manufacturer who sells a product to a seller who then sells it to a consumer who is injured by the produc...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Naimat, Nasihah, Abu Bakar, Elistina, Muhammad Arif, Afida Mastura |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Published: |
Human Resource Management Academic Research Society
2022
|
Online Access: | http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/100654/ https://hrmars.com/index.php/IJARBSS/article/view/14671/Challenges-in-Claiming-Under-The-Doctrine-of-Privity-Contract-in-Malaysia-The-Issue-of-Halal |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Consumer remedies on the issue of halal under contract law
by: Naimat, Nasihah, et al.
Published: (2022) -
Rights of redress on supply of goods under consumer protection Act 1999: the issue of halal logo
by: Naimat, Nasihah, et al.
Published: (2021) -
Doctrine of privity and its application in relation to sub-contractitor's pay
by: Mohd Amin, Nor Aida
Published: (2013) -
Hak dan perlindungan pengguna dalam produk halal
by: Naimat, Nasihah, et al.
Published: (2017) -
Consumer protection of false halal logo and misleading representation under the consumer Protection Act 1999
by: N., Nasihah, et al.
Published: (2020)