A critique of Rajendran et al.?s ?A critical and recent developments on adsorption technique for removal of heavy metals from wastewater ? A review?
This critique examines a review article in this journal on adsorption techniques for removing metal ions from wastewater. The article is marred by several flaws, including tortured phrases, miscitations, incoherent statements, and factual inaccuracies. These problems weaken the article's clarit...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Letter |
| Published: |
Elsevier Ltd
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| id |
my.uniten.dspace-36229 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
my.uniten.dspace-362292025-03-03T15:41:38Z A critique of Rajendran et al.?s ?A critical and recent developments on adsorption technique for removal of heavy metals from wastewater ? A review? Chu K.H. Bollinger J.-C. 7402453718 35546414700 Adsorption Metals, Heavy Waste Disposal, Fluid Wastewater Water Pollutants, Chemical Water Purification heavy metal heavy metal Factual error Gibberish Metals ions Miscitation Paper mill Plagiarism Review credibilities Scientific writing Tortured phrase adsorption error heavy metal removal Letter reliability standard waste water management adsorption chemistry procedures sewage wastewater water management water pollutant Heavy metals This critique examines a review article in this journal on adsorption techniques for removing metal ions from wastewater. The article is marred by several flaws, including tortured phrases, miscitations, incoherent statements, and factual inaccuracies. These problems weaken the article's clarity and reliability, raising doubts about the authors' understanding of the subject. As a result, the review's credibility is compromised, limiting its value as a reliable resource for researchers. This critique highlights these issues, stressing the importance of accuracy and rigor in scientific writing. ? 2024 Elsevier Ltd Final 2025-03-03T07:41:38Z 2025-03-03T07:41:38Z 2024 Letter 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.143761 2-s2.0-85209591974 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85209591974&doi=10.1016%2fj.chemosphere.2024.143761&partnerID=40&md5=67129920355485f0a581c0da81bdb084 https://irepository.uniten.edu.my/handle/123456789/36229 368 143761 Elsevier Ltd Scopus |
| institution |
Universiti Tenaga Nasional |
| building |
UNITEN Library |
| collection |
Institutional Repository |
| continent |
Asia |
| country |
Malaysia |
| content_provider |
Universiti Tenaga Nasional |
| content_source |
UNITEN Institutional Repository |
| url_provider |
http://dspace.uniten.edu.my/ |
| topic |
Adsorption Metals, Heavy Waste Disposal, Fluid Wastewater Water Pollutants, Chemical Water Purification heavy metal heavy metal Factual error Gibberish Metals ions Miscitation Paper mill Plagiarism Review credibilities Scientific writing Tortured phrase adsorption error heavy metal removal Letter reliability standard waste water management adsorption chemistry procedures sewage wastewater water management water pollutant Heavy metals |
| spellingShingle |
Adsorption Metals, Heavy Waste Disposal, Fluid Wastewater Water Pollutants, Chemical Water Purification heavy metal heavy metal Factual error Gibberish Metals ions Miscitation Paper mill Plagiarism Review credibilities Scientific writing Tortured phrase adsorption error heavy metal removal Letter reliability standard waste water management adsorption chemistry procedures sewage wastewater water management water pollutant Heavy metals Chu K.H. Bollinger J.-C. A critique of Rajendran et al.?s ?A critical and recent developments on adsorption technique for removal of heavy metals from wastewater ? A review? |
| description |
This critique examines a review article in this journal on adsorption techniques for removing metal ions from wastewater. The article is marred by several flaws, including tortured phrases, miscitations, incoherent statements, and factual inaccuracies. These problems weaken the article's clarity and reliability, raising doubts about the authors' understanding of the subject. As a result, the review's credibility is compromised, limiting its value as a reliable resource for researchers. This critique highlights these issues, stressing the importance of accuracy and rigor in scientific writing. ? 2024 Elsevier Ltd |
| author2 |
7402453718 |
| author_facet |
7402453718 Chu K.H. Bollinger J.-C. |
| format |
Letter |
| author |
Chu K.H. Bollinger J.-C. |
| author_sort |
Chu K.H. |
| title |
A critique of Rajendran et al.?s ?A critical and recent developments on adsorption technique for removal of heavy metals from wastewater ? A review? |
| title_short |
A critique of Rajendran et al.?s ?A critical and recent developments on adsorption technique for removal of heavy metals from wastewater ? A review? |
| title_full |
A critique of Rajendran et al.?s ?A critical and recent developments on adsorption technique for removal of heavy metals from wastewater ? A review? |
| title_fullStr |
A critique of Rajendran et al.?s ?A critical and recent developments on adsorption technique for removal of heavy metals from wastewater ? A review? |
| title_full_unstemmed |
A critique of Rajendran et al.?s ?A critical and recent developments on adsorption technique for removal of heavy metals from wastewater ? A review? |
| title_sort |
critique of rajendran et al.?s ?a critical and recent developments on adsorption technique for removal of heavy metals from wastewater ? a review? |
| publisher |
Elsevier Ltd |
| publishDate |
2025 |
| _version_ |
1825816266030448640 |
| score |
13.244413 |