Enhancing user experience and usability in engineering education: A comparative analysis of multiple functions and tangible user interfaces
A study was conducted at University Tenaga Nasional to compare engineering students� preferences in using augmented reality technology user interface (UI) applications to solve selected engineering problems. The study utilized a cross-sectional design and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test approach withi...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Article |
| Published: |
SAGE Publications Inc.
2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| id |
my.uniten.dspace-34510 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
my.uniten.dspace-345102024-10-14T11:20:17Z Enhancing user experience and usability in engineering education: A comparative analysis of multiple functions and tangible user interfaces Sidhu M.S. Ying J.G. 56259597000 57195804746 Augmented reality engineering education multiple functions user interface tangible user interface Augmented reality Computer software selection and evaluation Engineering education Students Augmented reality technology Comparative analyzes Cross-sectional design Engineering problems Interface applications Multiple function Multiple function user interface Tangible user interfaces Users' experiences Wilcoxon signed rank test User interfaces A study was conducted at University Tenaga Nasional to compare engineering students� preferences in using augmented reality technology user interface (UI) applications to solve selected engineering problems. The study utilized a cross-sectional design and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test approach within a controlled environment to analyse the difference in rankings of engineering applications. The study also measured learnability and assessed the software quality using questionnaire for user interaction satisfaction. The multiple function UI was found to be statistically significant more effective than the tangible user interface (TUI) for engineering students. The study provides reliable evidence that multiple function UI is a better option in engineering education than TUI. � The Author(s) 2023. Article in press 2024-10-14T03:20:17Z 2024-10-14T03:20:17Z 2023 Article 10.1177/03064190231205415 2-s2.0-85173762004 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85173762004&doi=10.1177%2f03064190231205415&partnerID=40&md5=6f32784cc12d37451ed2999393375e93 https://irepository.uniten.edu.my/handle/123456789/34510 SAGE Publications Inc. Scopus |
| institution |
Universiti Tenaga Nasional |
| building |
UNITEN Library |
| collection |
Institutional Repository |
| continent |
Asia |
| country |
Malaysia |
| content_provider |
Universiti Tenaga Nasional |
| content_source |
UNITEN Institutional Repository |
| url_provider |
http://dspace.uniten.edu.my/ |
| topic |
Augmented reality engineering education multiple functions user interface tangible user interface Augmented reality Computer software selection and evaluation Engineering education Students Augmented reality technology Comparative analyzes Cross-sectional design Engineering problems Interface applications Multiple function Multiple function user interface Tangible user interfaces Users' experiences Wilcoxon signed rank test User interfaces |
| spellingShingle |
Augmented reality engineering education multiple functions user interface tangible user interface Augmented reality Computer software selection and evaluation Engineering education Students Augmented reality technology Comparative analyzes Cross-sectional design Engineering problems Interface applications Multiple function Multiple function user interface Tangible user interfaces Users' experiences Wilcoxon signed rank test User interfaces Sidhu M.S. Ying J.G. Enhancing user experience and usability in engineering education: A comparative analysis of multiple functions and tangible user interfaces |
| description |
A study was conducted at University Tenaga Nasional to compare engineering students� preferences in using augmented reality technology user interface (UI) applications to solve selected engineering problems. The study utilized a cross-sectional design and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test approach within a controlled environment to analyse the difference in rankings of engineering applications. The study also measured learnability and assessed the software quality using questionnaire for user interaction satisfaction. The multiple function UI was found to be statistically significant more effective than the tangible user interface (TUI) for engineering students. The study provides reliable evidence that multiple function UI is a better option in engineering education than TUI. � The Author(s) 2023. |
| author2 |
56259597000 |
| author_facet |
56259597000 Sidhu M.S. Ying J.G. |
| format |
Article |
| author |
Sidhu M.S. Ying J.G. |
| author_sort |
Sidhu M.S. |
| title |
Enhancing user experience and usability in engineering education: A comparative analysis of multiple functions and tangible user interfaces |
| title_short |
Enhancing user experience and usability in engineering education: A comparative analysis of multiple functions and tangible user interfaces |
| title_full |
Enhancing user experience and usability in engineering education: A comparative analysis of multiple functions and tangible user interfaces |
| title_fullStr |
Enhancing user experience and usability in engineering education: A comparative analysis of multiple functions and tangible user interfaces |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Enhancing user experience and usability in engineering education: A comparative analysis of multiple functions and tangible user interfaces |
| title_sort |
enhancing user experience and usability in engineering education: a comparative analysis of multiple functions and tangible user interfaces |
| publisher |
SAGE Publications Inc. |
| publishDate |
2024 |
| _version_ |
1814061124521295872 |
| score |
13.222552 |