Carbon-negative co-production of methanol and activated carbon from bagasse pyrolysis, physical activation, chemical looping, and methanol synthesis

Methanol is regarded as an important chemical precursor in the chemical industry and has huge potential to replace gasoline and diesel as vehicle fuel. Biomass to methanol is a sustainable and green production method, but its economic and environmental viability is contingent on production technolog...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Su G., Zulkifli N.W.M., Liu L., Ong H.C., Ibrahim S., Yu K.L., Wei Y., Bin F.
Other Authors: 57222401295
Format: Article
Published: Elsevier Ltd 2024
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.uniten.dspace-33986
record_format dspace
spelling my.uniten.dspace-339862024-10-14T11:17:35Z Carbon-negative co-production of methanol and activated carbon from bagasse pyrolysis, physical activation, chemical looping, and methanol synthesis Su G. Zulkifli N.W.M. Liu L. Ong H.C. Ibrahim S. Yu K.L. Wei Y. Bin F. 57222401295 36471608600 57219124932 55310784800 7202480735 57539404500 58564773700 35274523400 Activated carbon Biomass pyrolysis Chemical looping CO<sub>2</sub> mitigation Methanol Bagasse Carbon dioxide Chemical activation Chemical industry Computer software Economic and social effects Energy efficiency Environmental management Environmental technology Global warming Hydrogen production Investments Methanol Synthesis gas manufacture Biomass pyrolysis Chemical looping Chemical precursors CO 2 mitigation Co-production Methanol production Methanol synthesis Physical activation Production methods Vehicle fuels Activated carbon Methanol is regarded as an important chemical precursor in the chemical industry and has huge potential to replace gasoline and diesel as vehicle fuel. Biomass to methanol is a sustainable and green production method, but its economic and environmental viability is contingent on production technologies and geographic context. This study proposed a carbon-negative methanol production method that integrated four modules of bagasse pyrolysis, physical activation, chemical looping, and methanol synthesis in the context of China. Three scenarios, including co-production of methanol and biochar, co-production of methanol and activated carbon, and co-production of methanol and activated carbon with extra hydrogen, were put forward and simulated in Aspen Plus. An evaluation system was established to quantitatively assess the carbon and energy efficiencies and economic and environmental benefits of the three scenarios. The results suggested that the addition of hydrogen effectively increased the methanol yield in Scenario 3, leading to high carbon and energy efficiencies. Scenarios 1 and 2 exhibited better economic and environmental performance with low payback periods of 6.53 and 5.80 years and low global warming potentials of ?1631.18 and ?710.28 kg CO2-eq/t methanol. However, Scenario 3 would be economically and environmentally feasible by decreasing hydrogen production costs and implementing green hydrogen production methods in the foreseeable future. This study provides a viable approach for sustainable methanol production in China, thereby aligning with the current imperative of achieving carbon neutrality. � 2023 Final 2024-10-14T03:17:35Z 2024-10-14T03:17:35Z 2023 Article 10.1016/j.enconman.2023.117481 2-s2.0-85169903162 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85169903162&doi=10.1016%2fj.enconman.2023.117481&partnerID=40&md5=755dc442b0ddf324637136066b418837 https://irepository.uniten.edu.my/handle/123456789/33986 293 117481 Elsevier Ltd Scopus
institution Universiti Tenaga Nasional
building UNITEN Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Tenaga Nasional
content_source UNITEN Institutional Repository
url_provider http://dspace.uniten.edu.my/
topic Activated carbon
Biomass pyrolysis
Chemical looping
CO<sub>2</sub> mitigation
Methanol
Bagasse
Carbon dioxide
Chemical activation
Chemical industry
Computer software
Economic and social effects
Energy efficiency
Environmental management
Environmental technology
Global warming
Hydrogen production
Investments
Methanol
Synthesis gas manufacture
Biomass pyrolysis
Chemical looping
Chemical precursors
CO 2 mitigation
Co-production
Methanol production
Methanol synthesis
Physical activation
Production methods
Vehicle fuels
Activated carbon
spellingShingle Activated carbon
Biomass pyrolysis
Chemical looping
CO<sub>2</sub> mitigation
Methanol
Bagasse
Carbon dioxide
Chemical activation
Chemical industry
Computer software
Economic and social effects
Energy efficiency
Environmental management
Environmental technology
Global warming
Hydrogen production
Investments
Methanol
Synthesis gas manufacture
Biomass pyrolysis
Chemical looping
Chemical precursors
CO 2 mitigation
Co-production
Methanol production
Methanol synthesis
Physical activation
Production methods
Vehicle fuels
Activated carbon
Su G.
Zulkifli N.W.M.
Liu L.
Ong H.C.
Ibrahim S.
Yu K.L.
Wei Y.
Bin F.
Carbon-negative co-production of methanol and activated carbon from bagasse pyrolysis, physical activation, chemical looping, and methanol synthesis
description Methanol is regarded as an important chemical precursor in the chemical industry and has huge potential to replace gasoline and diesel as vehicle fuel. Biomass to methanol is a sustainable and green production method, but its economic and environmental viability is contingent on production technologies and geographic context. This study proposed a carbon-negative methanol production method that integrated four modules of bagasse pyrolysis, physical activation, chemical looping, and methanol synthesis in the context of China. Three scenarios, including co-production of methanol and biochar, co-production of methanol and activated carbon, and co-production of methanol and activated carbon with extra hydrogen, were put forward and simulated in Aspen Plus. An evaluation system was established to quantitatively assess the carbon and energy efficiencies and economic and environmental benefits of the three scenarios. The results suggested that the addition of hydrogen effectively increased the methanol yield in Scenario 3, leading to high carbon and energy efficiencies. Scenarios 1 and 2 exhibited better economic and environmental performance with low payback periods of 6.53 and 5.80 years and low global warming potentials of ?1631.18 and ?710.28 kg CO2-eq/t methanol. However, Scenario 3 would be economically and environmentally feasible by decreasing hydrogen production costs and implementing green hydrogen production methods in the foreseeable future. This study provides a viable approach for sustainable methanol production in China, thereby aligning with the current imperative of achieving carbon neutrality. � 2023
author2 57222401295
author_facet 57222401295
Su G.
Zulkifli N.W.M.
Liu L.
Ong H.C.
Ibrahim S.
Yu K.L.
Wei Y.
Bin F.
format Article
author Su G.
Zulkifli N.W.M.
Liu L.
Ong H.C.
Ibrahim S.
Yu K.L.
Wei Y.
Bin F.
author_sort Su G.
title Carbon-negative co-production of methanol and activated carbon from bagasse pyrolysis, physical activation, chemical looping, and methanol synthesis
title_short Carbon-negative co-production of methanol and activated carbon from bagasse pyrolysis, physical activation, chemical looping, and methanol synthesis
title_full Carbon-negative co-production of methanol and activated carbon from bagasse pyrolysis, physical activation, chemical looping, and methanol synthesis
title_fullStr Carbon-negative co-production of methanol and activated carbon from bagasse pyrolysis, physical activation, chemical looping, and methanol synthesis
title_full_unstemmed Carbon-negative co-production of methanol and activated carbon from bagasse pyrolysis, physical activation, chemical looping, and methanol synthesis
title_sort carbon-negative co-production of methanol and activated carbon from bagasse pyrolysis, physical activation, chemical looping, and methanol synthesis
publisher Elsevier Ltd
publishDate 2024
_version_ 1814061097844473856
score 13.211869