Staff View: Performance comparison of MVDR and LCMV beamforming algorithm in 2.3 GHz adaptive antenna system

Performance comparison of MVDR and LCMV beamforming algorithm in 2.3 GHz adaptive antenna system

The blind beamforming technique is employed in the broadband wireless mobile systems to enhance the cellular systems in the aspect of capacity, data rates, null steering and coverage. This paper presents two methods of beamforming algorithm; Minimum Variance Distortionless Response (MVDR) and Linear...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Salem B., Tiong S.K., Koh S.P., Hock G.C.
Other Authors:	57769851500
Format:	Article
Published:	Praise Worthy Prize S.r.l 2023
Subjects:	Beamforming Linear constraint minimum variance LCMV Minimum variance distortionless response MVDR
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	my.uniten.dspace-30435
record_format	dspace
spelling	my.uniten.dspace-304352023-12-29T15:47:47Z Performance comparison of MVDR and LCMV beamforming algorithm in 2.3 GHz adaptive antenna system Salem B. Tiong S.K. Koh S.P. Hock G.C. 57769851500 15128307800 22951210700 16021614500 Beamforming Linear constraint minimum variance LCMV Minimum variance distortionless response MVDR The blind beamforming technique is employed in the broadband wireless mobile systems to enhance the cellular systems in the aspect of capacity, data rates, null steering and coverage. This paper presents two methods of beamforming algorithm; Minimum Variance Distortionless Response (MVDR) and Linear Constraint Minimum Variance (LCMV). MVDR and LCMV techniques form radiation beams based on the received weight vector of the desired signal. Simulation has been carried out to validate these two techniques. Four elements of the linear array antenna are used in our simulation program with the carrier frequency around 2.3 GHz, noise power 0.5dB, and the spacing between elements is 0.5 ?. The result of the simulation reveals that both the modes are capable of providing high output power; however direction of all the incoming sources is required, which is practically difficult to obtain. Nevertheless the MVDR beamforming, minimizes the multi-path fading problem, by adding the multi-path signal, which increases the strength of the desired signal and nullifies the interference. Overall, the MVDR technique is more accurate than the LCMV to null to find the interference source and directing radiation lobe with high power towards the desired signal. � 2012 Praise Worthy Prize S.r.l.-All rights reserved. Final 2023-12-29T07:47:47Z 2023-12-29T07:47:47Z 2012 Article 2-s2.0-84906542690 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84906542690&partnerID=40&md5=6b4cecfb3f1b1357c927c8c99984d71e https://irepository.uniten.edu.my/handle/123456789/30435 2 2 153 159 Praise Worthy Prize S.r.l Scopus
institution	Universiti Tenaga Nasional
building	UNITEN Library
collection	Institutional Repository
continent	Asia
country	Malaysia
content_provider	Universiti Tenaga Nasional
content_source	UNITEN Institutional Repository
url_provider	http://dspace.uniten.edu.my/
topic	Beamforming Linear constraint minimum variance LCMV Minimum variance distortionless response MVDR
spellingShingle	Beamforming Linear constraint minimum variance LCMV Minimum variance distortionless response MVDR Salem B. Tiong S.K. Koh S.P. Hock G.C. Performance comparison of MVDR and LCMV beamforming algorithm in 2.3 GHz adaptive antenna system
description	The blind beamforming technique is employed in the broadband wireless mobile systems to enhance the cellular systems in the aspect of capacity, data rates, null steering and coverage. This paper presents two methods of beamforming algorithm; Minimum Variance Distortionless Response (MVDR) and Linear Constraint Minimum Variance (LCMV). MVDR and LCMV techniques form radiation beams based on the received weight vector of the desired signal. Simulation has been carried out to validate these two techniques. Four elements of the linear array antenna are used in our simulation program with the carrier frequency around 2.3 GHz, noise power 0.5dB, and the spacing between elements is 0.5 ?. The result of the simulation reveals that both the modes are capable of providing high output power; however direction of all the incoming sources is required, which is practically difficult to obtain. Nevertheless the MVDR beamforming, minimizes the multi-path fading problem, by adding the multi-path signal, which increases the strength of the desired signal and nullifies the interference. Overall, the MVDR technique is more accurate than the LCMV to null to find the interference source and directing radiation lobe with high power towards the desired signal. � 2012 Praise Worthy Prize S.r.l.-All rights reserved.
author2	57769851500
author_facet	57769851500 Salem B. Tiong S.K. Koh S.P. Hock G.C.
format	Article
author	Salem B. Tiong S.K. Koh S.P. Hock G.C.
author_sort	Salem B.
title	Performance comparison of MVDR and LCMV beamforming algorithm in 2.3 GHz adaptive antenna system
title_short	Performance comparison of MVDR and LCMV beamforming algorithm in 2.3 GHz adaptive antenna system
title_full	Performance comparison of MVDR and LCMV beamforming algorithm in 2.3 GHz adaptive antenna system
title_fullStr	Performance comparison of MVDR and LCMV beamforming algorithm in 2.3 GHz adaptive antenna system
title_full_unstemmed	Performance comparison of MVDR and LCMV beamforming algorithm in 2.3 GHz adaptive antenna system
title_sort	performance comparison of mvdr and lcmv beamforming algorithm in 2.3 ghz adaptive antenna system
publisher	Praise Worthy Prize S.r.l
publishDate	2023
_version_	1806423384860393472
score	13.211869

Performance comparison of MVDR and LCMV beamforming algorithm in 2.3 GHz adaptive antenna system

Similar Items