A new image quality measure for assessment of histogram equalization-based contrast enhancement techniques
Absolute Mean Brightness Error (AMBE) and Entropy are among the two most popular IQMs used to assess Histogram Equalization (HE) based techniques. To the best of author's knowledge, there is no evaluation report on how well the two IQMs correlate to human opinion. This paper reviews and discuss...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Published: |
Elsevier Inc.
2023
|
Subjects: | |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
my.uniten.dspace-30365 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
my.uniten.dspace-303652023-12-29T15:47:05Z A new image quality measure for assessment of histogram equalization-based contrast enhancement techniques Chen S.-D. 7410253413 Contrast enhancement Distortions Histogram equalization Quality measures Visual perception Correlation methods Distortion (waves) Entropy Equalizers Graphic methods Image enhancement Mean square error Quality control Vision Contrast Enhancement Histogram equalizations Information fidelity criterion Pearson correlation coefficients Quality measures Root mean square errors Subjective quality assessments Visual perception Image quality Absolute Mean Brightness Error (AMBE) and Entropy are among the two most popular IQMs used to assess Histogram Equalization (HE) based techniques. To the best of author's knowledge, there is no evaluation report on how well the two IQMs correlate to human opinion. This paper reviews and discusses the potential flaws in using AMBE and Entropy to assess HE-based techniques. This paper presents results of a subjective quality assessment in which image quality data obtained from 1935 human observer opinion scores were used to evaluate the IQMs. The statistical evaluation results show that the two IQMs have poor correlation with human mean opinion score (MOS); Pearson Correlation Coefficient (PCC)<0.4, Root Mean Square Error (RMSE)>0.75, Outlier Ratio (OR)>20%. A new IQM which takes into account important properties of human visual perception (HVP) is proposed. It is tested and found to have significantly better correlation (PCC>0.86, RMSE<0.39 and OR=0%). The proposed IQM also outperforms Multi-Scale Structural Similarity (MSSIM) and Information Fidelity Criterion-based (IFC) measure, which are two prominent fidelity-based IQMs. � 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Final 2023-12-29T07:47:05Z 2023-12-29T07:47:05Z 2012 Article 10.1016/j.dsp.2012.04.002 2-s2.0-84860669159 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84860669159&doi=10.1016%2fj.dsp.2012.04.002&partnerID=40&md5=9e31b80877be3f5f6f83bf661b961bb7 https://irepository.uniten.edu.my/handle/123456789/30365 22 4 640 647 Elsevier Inc. Scopus |
institution |
Universiti Tenaga Nasional |
building |
UNITEN Library |
collection |
Institutional Repository |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Malaysia |
content_provider |
Universiti Tenaga Nasional |
content_source |
UNITEN Institutional Repository |
url_provider |
http://dspace.uniten.edu.my/ |
topic |
Contrast enhancement Distortions Histogram equalization Quality measures Visual perception Correlation methods Distortion (waves) Entropy Equalizers Graphic methods Image enhancement Mean square error Quality control Vision Contrast Enhancement Histogram equalizations Information fidelity criterion Pearson correlation coefficients Quality measures Root mean square errors Subjective quality assessments Visual perception Image quality |
spellingShingle |
Contrast enhancement Distortions Histogram equalization Quality measures Visual perception Correlation methods Distortion (waves) Entropy Equalizers Graphic methods Image enhancement Mean square error Quality control Vision Contrast Enhancement Histogram equalizations Information fidelity criterion Pearson correlation coefficients Quality measures Root mean square errors Subjective quality assessments Visual perception Image quality Chen S.-D. A new image quality measure for assessment of histogram equalization-based contrast enhancement techniques |
description |
Absolute Mean Brightness Error (AMBE) and Entropy are among the two most popular IQMs used to assess Histogram Equalization (HE) based techniques. To the best of author's knowledge, there is no evaluation report on how well the two IQMs correlate to human opinion. This paper reviews and discusses the potential flaws in using AMBE and Entropy to assess HE-based techniques. This paper presents results of a subjective quality assessment in which image quality data obtained from 1935 human observer opinion scores were used to evaluate the IQMs. The statistical evaluation results show that the two IQMs have poor correlation with human mean opinion score (MOS); Pearson Correlation Coefficient (PCC)<0.4, Root Mean Square Error (RMSE)>0.75, Outlier Ratio (OR)>20%. A new IQM which takes into account important properties of human visual perception (HVP) is proposed. It is tested and found to have significantly better correlation (PCC>0.86, RMSE<0.39 and OR=0%). The proposed IQM also outperforms Multi-Scale Structural Similarity (MSSIM) and Information Fidelity Criterion-based (IFC) measure, which are two prominent fidelity-based IQMs. � 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
author2 |
7410253413 |
author_facet |
7410253413 Chen S.-D. |
format |
Article |
author |
Chen S.-D. |
author_sort |
Chen S.-D. |
title |
A new image quality measure for assessment of histogram equalization-based contrast enhancement techniques |
title_short |
A new image quality measure for assessment of histogram equalization-based contrast enhancement techniques |
title_full |
A new image quality measure for assessment of histogram equalization-based contrast enhancement techniques |
title_fullStr |
A new image quality measure for assessment of histogram equalization-based contrast enhancement techniques |
title_full_unstemmed |
A new image quality measure for assessment of histogram equalization-based contrast enhancement techniques |
title_sort |
new image quality measure for assessment of histogram equalization-based contrast enhancement techniques |
publisher |
Elsevier Inc. |
publishDate |
2023 |
_version_ |
1806427304632516608 |
score |
13.211869 |