Brain Tumour Classification using Deep Learning with Residual Attention Network : A Comparative Study
— The main goal of this paper is to evaluate the performance of deep learning with Residual Attention Network (RAN) for brain tumour classification. Digitalised Magnetic Resonance Image (MRI) datasets obtained from Malaysian hospitals and other sources are utilised in this paper. The MRI datase...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Proceeding |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
IEEE
2021
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/35722/1/tumour1.pdf http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/35722/ https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9493544 https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOTEN52080.2021.9493544 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| id |
my.unimas.ir.35722 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
eprints |
| spelling |
my.unimas.ir.357222023-08-23T01:26:50Z http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/35722/ Brain Tumour Classification using Deep Learning with Residual Attention Network : A Comparative Study Abdulrazak Yahya, Saleh Sashwini, S. Thiagaraju RZ Other systems of medicine — The main goal of this paper is to evaluate the performance of deep learning with Residual Attention Network (RAN) for brain tumour classification. Digitalised Magnetic Resonance Image (MRI) datasets obtained from Malaysian hospitals and other sources are utilised in this paper. The MRI datasets consist of information of those patients who are 20 years old and above, both male and female. The RAN algorithm is trained and tested using the MRI datasets. The algorithm performance is evaluated based on training accuracy, testing accuracy, validation accuracy, and validation loss metrices. Moreover, a comparative analysis is done with Residual Neural Network (ResNet) and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) using the same datasets. The findings from this study prove that RAN provides the best performance among the three algorithms. ResNet has good performance, with an accuracy ranging from 67% to 87%. The standard CNN algorithm does not perform well, with a very inconsistent accuracy of between 57% and 71%. RAN produces the highest and most consistent accuracy, which is 94% and above. Further explanation is provided in this paper to prove the efficiency of RAN for the classification of brain tumours IEEE 2021-07-28 Proceeding PeerReviewed text en http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/35722/1/tumour1.pdf Abdulrazak Yahya, Saleh and Sashwini, S. Thiagaraju (2021) Brain Tumour Classification using Deep Learning with Residual Attention Network : A Comparative Study. In: 2021 International Congress of Advanced Technology and Engineering (ICOTEN), 4-5 July 2021, Taiz, Yemen. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9493544 https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOTEN52080.2021.9493544 |
| institution |
Universiti Malaysia Sarawak |
| building |
Centre for Academic Information Services (CAIS) |
| collection |
Institutional Repository |
| continent |
Asia |
| country |
Malaysia |
| content_provider |
Universiti Malaysia Sarawak |
| content_source |
UNIMAS Institutional Repository |
| url_provider |
http://ir.unimas.my/ |
| language |
English |
| topic |
RZ Other systems of medicine |
| spellingShingle |
RZ Other systems of medicine Abdulrazak Yahya, Saleh Sashwini, S. Thiagaraju Brain Tumour Classification using Deep Learning with Residual Attention Network : A Comparative Study |
| description |
— The main goal of this paper is to evaluate the
performance of deep learning with Residual Attention
Network (RAN) for brain tumour classification. Digitalised
Magnetic Resonance Image (MRI) datasets obtained from
Malaysian hospitals and other sources are utilised in this
paper. The MRI datasets consist of information of those
patients who are 20 years old and above, both male and
female. The RAN algorithm is trained and tested using the
MRI datasets. The algorithm performance is evaluated based
on training accuracy, testing accuracy, validation accuracy,
and validation loss metrices. Moreover, a comparative
analysis is done with Residual Neural Network (ResNet) and
Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) using the same
datasets. The findings from this study prove that RAN
provides the best performance among the three algorithms.
ResNet has good performance, with an accuracy ranging from
67% to 87%. The standard CNN algorithm does not perform
well, with a very inconsistent accuracy of between 57% and
71%. RAN produces the highest and most consistent
accuracy, which is 94% and above. Further explanation is
provided in this paper to prove the efficiency of RAN for the
classification of brain tumours |
| format |
Proceeding |
| author |
Abdulrazak Yahya, Saleh Sashwini, S. Thiagaraju |
| author_facet |
Abdulrazak Yahya, Saleh Sashwini, S. Thiagaraju |
| author_sort |
Abdulrazak Yahya, Saleh |
| title |
Brain Tumour Classification using Deep Learning with Residual Attention Network : A Comparative Study |
| title_short |
Brain Tumour Classification using Deep Learning with Residual Attention Network : A Comparative Study |
| title_full |
Brain Tumour Classification using Deep Learning with Residual Attention Network : A Comparative Study |
| title_fullStr |
Brain Tumour Classification using Deep Learning with Residual Attention Network : A Comparative Study |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Brain Tumour Classification using Deep Learning with Residual Attention Network : A Comparative Study |
| title_sort |
brain tumour classification using deep learning with residual attention network : a comparative study |
| publisher |
IEEE |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| url |
http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/35722/1/tumour1.pdf http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/35722/ https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9493544 https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOTEN52080.2021.9493544 |
| _version_ |
1775627301058248704 |
| score |
13.211869 |