Cover Image

Regional and experiential differences in surgeon preference for the treatment of cervical facet injuries: a case study survey with the AO Spine Cervical Classification Validation Group

Purpose The management of cervical facet dislocation injuries remains controversial. The main purpose of this investigation was to identify whether a surgeon’s geographic location or years in practice infuences their preferred management of traumatic cervical facet dislocation injuries. Methods A...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Canseco, Jose A., Schroeder, Gregory D., Patel, Parthik D., Grasso, Giovanni, Chang, Michael, Kandziora, Frank, Vialle, Emiliano N., Oner, F. Cumhur, Schnake, Klaus J., Mohamad Zaki, Mohd Amin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer 2020
Subjects:
RD Surgery
Online Access:http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/32877/1/Canseco%20Jose%20A..pdf
http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/32877/
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00586-020-06535-z
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.unimas.ir.32877
record_format eprints
spelling my.unimas.ir.328772021-04-01T04:49:37Z http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/32877/ Regional and experiential differences in surgeon preference for the treatment of cervical facet injuries: a case study survey with the AO Spine Cervical Classification Validation Group Canseco, Jose A. Schroeder, Gregory D. Patel, Parthik D. Grasso, Giovanni Chang, Michael Kandziora, Frank Vialle, Emiliano N. Oner, F. Cumhur Schnake, Klaus J. Mohamad Zaki, Mohd Amin RD Surgery Purpose The management of cervical facet dislocation injuries remains controversial. The main purpose of this investigation was to identify whether a surgeon’s geographic location or years in practice infuences their preferred management of traumatic cervical facet dislocation injuries. Methods A survey was sent to 272 AO Spine members across all geographic regions and with a variety of practice experience. The survey included clinical case scenarios of cervical facet dislocation injuries and asked responders to select preferences among various diagnostic and management options. Results A total of 189 complete responses were received. Over 50% of responding surgeons in each region elected to initiate management of cervical facet dislocation injuries with an MRI, with 6 case exceptions. Overall, there was considerable agreement between American and European responders regarding management of these injuries, with only 3 cases exhibiting a signifcant diference. Additionally, results also exhibited considerable management agreement between those with≤10 and>10 years of practice experience, with only 2 case exceptions noted. Conclusion More than half of responders, regardless of geographical location or practice experience, identifed MRI as a screening imaging modality when managing cervical facet dislocation injuries, regardless of the status of the spinal cord and prior to any additional intervention. Additionally, a majority of surgeons would elect an anterior approach for the surgical management of these injuries. The study found overall agreement in management preferences of cervical facet dislocation injuries around the globe. Keywords Cervical spine · Trauma · Spinal injuries · Joint dislocations · Neck injuries · Spinal diseases Springer 2020-07-22 Article PeerReviewed text en http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/32877/1/Canseco%20Jose%20A..pdf Canseco, Jose A. and Schroeder, Gregory D. and Patel, Parthik D. and Grasso, Giovanni and Chang, Michael and Kandziora, Frank and Vialle, Emiliano N. and Oner, F. Cumhur and Schnake, Klaus J. and Mohamad Zaki, Mohd Amin (2020) Regional and experiential differences in surgeon preference for the treatment of cervical facet injuries: a case study survey with the AO Spine Cervical Classification Validation Group. European Spine Journal. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00586-020-06535-z 10.1007/s00586-020-06535-z
institution Universiti Malaysia Sarawak
building Centre for Academic Information Services (CAIS)
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaysia Sarawak
content_source UNIMAS Institutional Repository
url_provider http://ir.unimas.my/
language English
topic RD Surgery
spellingShingle RD Surgery
Canseco, Jose A.
Schroeder, Gregory D.
Patel, Parthik D.
Grasso, Giovanni
Chang, Michael
Kandziora, Frank
Vialle, Emiliano N.
Oner, F. Cumhur
Schnake, Klaus J.
Mohamad Zaki, Mohd Amin
Regional and experiential differences in surgeon preference for the treatment of cervical facet injuries: a case study survey with the AO Spine Cervical Classification Validation Group
description Purpose The management of cervical facet dislocation injuries remains controversial. The main purpose of this investigation was to identify whether a surgeon’s geographic location or years in practice infuences their preferred management of traumatic cervical facet dislocation injuries. Methods A survey was sent to 272 AO Spine members across all geographic regions and with a variety of practice experience. The survey included clinical case scenarios of cervical facet dislocation injuries and asked responders to select preferences among various diagnostic and management options. Results A total of 189 complete responses were received. Over 50% of responding surgeons in each region elected to initiate management of cervical facet dislocation injuries with an MRI, with 6 case exceptions. Overall, there was considerable agreement between American and European responders regarding management of these injuries, with only 3 cases exhibiting a signifcant diference. Additionally, results also exhibited considerable management agreement between those with≤10 and>10 years of practice experience, with only 2 case exceptions noted. Conclusion More than half of responders, regardless of geographical location or practice experience, identifed MRI as a screening imaging modality when managing cervical facet dislocation injuries, regardless of the status of the spinal cord and prior to any additional intervention. Additionally, a majority of surgeons would elect an anterior approach for the surgical management of these injuries. The study found overall agreement in management preferences of cervical facet dislocation injuries around the globe. Keywords Cervical spine · Trauma · Spinal injuries · Joint dislocations · Neck injuries · Spinal diseases
format Article
author Canseco, Jose A.
Schroeder, Gregory D.
Patel, Parthik D.
Grasso, Giovanni
Chang, Michael
Kandziora, Frank
Vialle, Emiliano N.
Oner, F. Cumhur
Schnake, Klaus J.
Mohamad Zaki, Mohd Amin
author_facet Canseco, Jose A.
Schroeder, Gregory D.
Patel, Parthik D.
Grasso, Giovanni
Chang, Michael
Kandziora, Frank
Vialle, Emiliano N.
Oner, F. Cumhur
Schnake, Klaus J.
Mohamad Zaki, Mohd Amin
author_sort Canseco, Jose A.
title Regional and experiential differences in surgeon preference for the treatment of cervical facet injuries: a case study survey with the AO Spine Cervical Classification Validation Group
title_short Regional and experiential differences in surgeon preference for the treatment of cervical facet injuries: a case study survey with the AO Spine Cervical Classification Validation Group
title_full Regional and experiential differences in surgeon preference for the treatment of cervical facet injuries: a case study survey with the AO Spine Cervical Classification Validation Group
title_fullStr Regional and experiential differences in surgeon preference for the treatment of cervical facet injuries: a case study survey with the AO Spine Cervical Classification Validation Group
title_full_unstemmed Regional and experiential differences in surgeon preference for the treatment of cervical facet injuries: a case study survey with the AO Spine Cervical Classification Validation Group
title_sort regional and experiential differences in surgeon preference for the treatment of cervical facet injuries: a case study survey with the ao spine cervical classification validation group
publisher Springer
publishDate 2020
url http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/32877/1/Canseco%20Jose%20A..pdf
http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/32877/
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00586-020-06535-z
_version_ 1696979531527618560
score 13.211869

Similar Items