Oil droplets and solid particles removal using circular separator with inclined coalescence mediums : comparison between co-current and counter-current flow

This research investigated the effects of co- and counter-current flow patterns on oil-water-solid separation efficiencies of a circular separator with inclined coalescence mediums. Oil-water-solid separations were tested at different influent concentrations and flowrates. Removal efficiencies incre...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Law, Puong Ling, Ngu, Lock Hei, Wong, Kien Kuok, Yusof, A. A.R
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IWA Publishing 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/31198/1/Oil%20droplets.pdf
http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/31198/
https://iwaponline.com/wst
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.unimas.ir.31198
record_format eprints
spelling my.unimas.ir.311982022-03-18T08:33:41Z http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/31198/ Oil droplets and solid particles removal using circular separator with inclined coalescence mediums : comparison between co-current and counter-current flow Law, Puong Ling Ngu, Lock Hei Wong, Kien Kuok Yusof, A. A.R TD Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering This research investigated the effects of co- and counter-current flow patterns on oil-water-solid separation efficiencies of a circular separator with inclined coalescence mediums. Oil-water-solid separations were tested at different influent concentrations and flowrates. Removal efficiencies increased as influent flowrate decreased, and their correlationship can be represented by power equations. These equations were used to predict the required flowrate, Qss50, for a given influent suspended solids concentration Ciss to achieve the desired effluent suspended solids concentration, Cess of 50 mg/L, to meet environmental discharge requirements. The circular separator with counter-current flow was found to attend removal efficiencies relatively higher as compared to the co-current flow. As compared with co-current flow, counter-current flow Qss50 was approximately 1.65 times higher than co-current flow. It also recorded 13.16% higher oil removal at influent oil concentration, Cio of 100 mg/L, and approximately 5.89% higher TSS removal at all influent flowrates. Counter-current flow’s better removal performances were due to its higher coalescing area and constant interval between coalescence plate layers. IWA Publishing 2010 Article PeerReviewed text en http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/31198/1/Oil%20droplets.pdf Law, Puong Ling and Ngu, Lock Hei and Wong, Kien Kuok and Yusof, A. A.R (2010) Oil droplets and solid particles removal using circular separator with inclined coalescence mediums : comparison between co-current and counter-current flow. Water science and technology, 62 (5). pp. 1129-1135. ISSN 1996-9732 https://iwaponline.com/wst DOI: 10.2166/wst.2010.407
institution Universiti Malaysia Sarawak
building Centre for Academic Information Services (CAIS)
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaysia Sarawak
content_source UNIMAS Institutional Repository
url_provider http://ir.unimas.my/
language English
topic TD Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering
spellingShingle TD Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering
Law, Puong Ling
Ngu, Lock Hei
Wong, Kien Kuok
Yusof, A. A.R
Oil droplets and solid particles removal using circular separator with inclined coalescence mediums : comparison between co-current and counter-current flow
description This research investigated the effects of co- and counter-current flow patterns on oil-water-solid separation efficiencies of a circular separator with inclined coalescence mediums. Oil-water-solid separations were tested at different influent concentrations and flowrates. Removal efficiencies increased as influent flowrate decreased, and their correlationship can be represented by power equations. These equations were used to predict the required flowrate, Qss50, for a given influent suspended solids concentration Ciss to achieve the desired effluent suspended solids concentration, Cess of 50 mg/L, to meet environmental discharge requirements. The circular separator with counter-current flow was found to attend removal efficiencies relatively higher as compared to the co-current flow. As compared with co-current flow, counter-current flow Qss50 was approximately 1.65 times higher than co-current flow. It also recorded 13.16% higher oil removal at influent oil concentration, Cio of 100 mg/L, and approximately 5.89% higher TSS removal at all influent flowrates. Counter-current flow’s better removal performances were due to its higher coalescing area and constant interval between coalescence plate layers.
format Article
author Law, Puong Ling
Ngu, Lock Hei
Wong, Kien Kuok
Yusof, A. A.R
author_facet Law, Puong Ling
Ngu, Lock Hei
Wong, Kien Kuok
Yusof, A. A.R
author_sort Law, Puong Ling
title Oil droplets and solid particles removal using circular separator with inclined coalescence mediums : comparison between co-current and counter-current flow
title_short Oil droplets and solid particles removal using circular separator with inclined coalescence mediums : comparison between co-current and counter-current flow
title_full Oil droplets and solid particles removal using circular separator with inclined coalescence mediums : comparison between co-current and counter-current flow
title_fullStr Oil droplets and solid particles removal using circular separator with inclined coalescence mediums : comparison between co-current and counter-current flow
title_full_unstemmed Oil droplets and solid particles removal using circular separator with inclined coalescence mediums : comparison between co-current and counter-current flow
title_sort oil droplets and solid particles removal using circular separator with inclined coalescence mediums : comparison between co-current and counter-current flow
publisher IWA Publishing
publishDate 2010
url http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/31198/1/Oil%20droplets.pdf
http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/31198/
https://iwaponline.com/wst
_version_ 1728055569623810048
score 13.211869