A case study to assess the social impacts of Borneo Highlands Resort projects on its surrounding communities
,A study to evaluate the social impacts of the Borneo Highlands Resort and its link roads on the surrounding communities is carried out. Three villages namely Kpg. Annah Rais, Kpg. Abang and Kpg. Temurang were identified and selected in this study. The objectives were to find out and assess the...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, (UNIMAS)
2004
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/12180/1/Dominic%20Chuo%20Kong%20Uh%20ft.pdf http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/12180/ |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | ,A study to evaluate the social impacts of the Borneo Highlands Resort and its link
roads on the surrounding communities is carried out.
Three villages namely Kpg. Annah Rais, Kpg. Abang and Kpg. Temurang were
identified and selected in this study. The objectives were to find out and assess the
social impacts and the perception and awareness of the communities of the project.
A qualitative method was used to gather data and information by using a designed
questionnaires and conducting key informant interviews and questionnaire survey.
The interviewees covered the old and young and, men and women to provide a
diverse range of responses from different strata of the communities) A total of 62
respondents were interviewed, 32 from Kpg. Annah Rais, 20 from pg. Abang and
10 from Kpg. Temurang, covering 25% of the population. The responses were
tabulated and analysed using the computer program, Statistical Package for Social
Sciences (SPSS) Version 11.0 for Windows. Descriptive statistics were evaluated and
converted to graphs, tables and charts for analysis. The study revealed that the
majority of the respondents viewed the project as "average" and 79% of the
respondents viewed as "neutral" in terms of overall benefit. This is contrary to the
general perception that the project would be regarded as "good" or "very good" by the
surrounding communities. However, all the respondents agreed that the project
provided better infrastructure especially roads and drains. On the negative front, a
high percentage (87%) of the respondents expressed that there is environmental
pollution to the air, water and soil. Generally it was revealed that there should be
more health facilities such as hospitals and clinics, essential services such as
telecommunications, improved employment opportunities at the resort, and better
business opportunities from the resort. The leaders of the three villages expressed
the aspirations of their communities in the areas of education for the children,
employment and business opportunities, joint ventures schemes, involvement of the
resort in their communities and contribution and cooperation in promotion of
tourism products from the villages. The results showed that while the resort
development clearly brought improved infrastructure, there need to be more
information and involvement by the developer with the local and surrounding
communities to create and enhance goodwill and to generate more positive
perception and awareness of the project. |
|---|