Weed control efficiency of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) spray in replanting oil palm plantation areas
Efficient chemical weed management considers precise application of herbicides, maximizing herbicide retention and absorption, reducing the impact of abiotic factors, and mitigating offtarget movement in order to optimize herbicide efficacy. Hence, this study assessed the employability and cost-effi...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Cambridge University Press
2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/46699/2/Weed%20control%20efficiency%20of%20unmanned%20aerial%20-%20Copy.pdf http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/46699/ https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/weed-science/article/weed-control-efficiency-of-unmanned-aerial-vehicle-uav-spray-in-replanting-oil-palm-plantation-areas/8CB8FC17E7A1F5C63B5B10E685097AC6 https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2024.91 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Efficient chemical weed management considers precise application of herbicides, maximizing herbicide retention and absorption, reducing the impact of abiotic factors, and mitigating offtarget movement in order to optimize herbicide efficacy. Hence, this study assessed the employability and cost-efficiency of an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) for pre-planting application and post-emergence selective grass weed control infesting legume cover crops (LCCs) in immature oil palm (Elaeis quineensis Jacq.) plantation. Field experiments were conducted in 2020 and 2021 at a research center and an oil palm replanting area in Jerantut, Pahang, Malaysia. Droplet deposition and distribution analyses revealed that the pressure at 0.25 MPa yielded better spraying coverage and increased droplet counts compared to 0.15 MPa. For pre-planting application, both UAV and mist blower resulted in total weed control. Meanwhile for selective grass control in the LCCs, conventional knapsack sprayer (CKS) application provided slightly better weed control than the UAV over the 12 weeks observation. However, cost-efficiency analysis revealed that UAV spraying yielded economically favorable for areas over 3,000 hectares, with potential savings ranging from 4% to 28%. Furthermore, UAV spraying demonstrated superior operational efficiency and reduced working hours by 37%, water consumption by 91%, and human labor expenses by 81% compared to both conventional methods. These findings underscore the potential of UAV-based spraying for large-scale weed control in oil palm plantations and highlight its efficiency, comparable effectiveness, and costsaving benefits. |
|---|