Cover Image

A Review of the Recreational Benefits of Cultural Ecosystem Service (CES) Indicators in the Urban Area

Cultural ecosystem services (CES) are the intangible, invisible, and non-consumable benefits of the ecosystem to human welfare. Nevertheless, due to the not a practical conceptual framework, there are lacking information on CES studies in the urban area. So, the aim of this paper systematically anal...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kaede Chan Lip Chung, Andy Russel Mojiol
Format: Article
Language:English
English
Published: UCTS Publisher 2018
Subjects:
QH540-549.5 Ecology
QK1-474.5 General Including geographical distribution
Online Access:https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/37653/1/ABSTRACT.pdf
https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/37653/2/FULL%20TEXT.pdf
https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/37653/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.ums.eprints.37653
record_format eprints
spelling my.ums.eprints.376532023-11-27T01:36:13Z https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/37653/ A Review of the Recreational Benefits of Cultural Ecosystem Service (CES) Indicators in the Urban Area Kaede Chan Lip Chung Andy Russel Mojiol QH540-549.5 Ecology QK1-474.5 General Including geographical distribution Cultural ecosystem services (CES) are the intangible, invisible, and non-consumable benefits of the ecosystem to human welfare. Nevertheless, due to the not a practical conceptual framework, there are lacking information on CES studies in the urban area. So, the aim of this paper systematically analyzes the works of literature on the recreational benefits of CES. A total of 38 journal paper systematical analysis found that MEA and TEEB are often to be used rather than CICES because it is still new in this field. Moreover, a total of 23 indicators indicate the value of recreation in the green space. Recreation should define as the natural landscape of people's preference for spending their leisure time interacting with physical and experiential facilitating outdoor activities to promote health and enjoyment. Subsequently, this study can also conclude that non-monetary assessments are the best approach to conducting empirical studies of CES. Simultaneously, in-depth studies are needed to look at the feasibility of these indicators for the ecosystem of the global. UCTS Publisher 2018 Article NonPeerReviewed text en https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/37653/1/ABSTRACT.pdf text en https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/37653/2/FULL%20TEXT.pdf Kaede Chan Lip Chung and Andy Russel Mojiol (2018) A Review of the Recreational Benefits of Cultural Ecosystem Service (CES) Indicators in the Urban Area. Borneo Journal of Sciences and Technology, 5. pp. 98-105.
institution Universiti Malaysia Sabah
building UMS Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaysia Sabah
content_source UMS Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.ums.edu.my/
language English
English
topic QH540-549.5 Ecology
QK1-474.5 General Including geographical distribution
spellingShingle QH540-549.5 Ecology
QK1-474.5 General Including geographical distribution
Kaede Chan Lip Chung
Andy Russel Mojiol
A Review of the Recreational Benefits of Cultural Ecosystem Service (CES) Indicators in the Urban Area
description Cultural ecosystem services (CES) are the intangible, invisible, and non-consumable benefits of the ecosystem to human welfare. Nevertheless, due to the not a practical conceptual framework, there are lacking information on CES studies in the urban area. So, the aim of this paper systematically analyzes the works of literature on the recreational benefits of CES. A total of 38 journal paper systematical analysis found that MEA and TEEB are often to be used rather than CICES because it is still new in this field. Moreover, a total of 23 indicators indicate the value of recreation in the green space. Recreation should define as the natural landscape of people's preference for spending their leisure time interacting with physical and experiential facilitating outdoor activities to promote health and enjoyment. Subsequently, this study can also conclude that non-monetary assessments are the best approach to conducting empirical studies of CES. Simultaneously, in-depth studies are needed to look at the feasibility of these indicators for the ecosystem of the global.
format Article
author Kaede Chan Lip Chung
Andy Russel Mojiol
author_facet Kaede Chan Lip Chung
Andy Russel Mojiol
author_sort Kaede Chan Lip Chung
title A Review of the Recreational Benefits of Cultural Ecosystem Service (CES) Indicators in the Urban Area
title_short A Review of the Recreational Benefits of Cultural Ecosystem Service (CES) Indicators in the Urban Area
title_full A Review of the Recreational Benefits of Cultural Ecosystem Service (CES) Indicators in the Urban Area
title_fullStr A Review of the Recreational Benefits of Cultural Ecosystem Service (CES) Indicators in the Urban Area
title_full_unstemmed A Review of the Recreational Benefits of Cultural Ecosystem Service (CES) Indicators in the Urban Area
title_sort review of the recreational benefits of cultural ecosystem service (ces) indicators in the urban area
publisher UCTS Publisher
publishDate 2018
url https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/37653/1/ABSTRACT.pdf
https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/37653/2/FULL%20TEXT.pdf
https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/37653/
_version_ 1783877956305682432
score 13.211869

Similar Items