Cover Image

Water sources derived bio retting effect on kenaf fiber compositions

Concurrent eutrophication and scarcity of water have made the difficulties for kenaf retting; hence, seawater (SW), freshwater (FW), and municipal wastewater (MTW) were assessed for kenaf retting feasibility. SW retting liquor showed highest 1.39 × 108 CFU/mL bacterial loads on the 5th day, compared...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohammad Munir Hossain, Md. Shafiquzzaman Siddiquee, Vijay Kumar Subbiah
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor and Francis 2021
Subjects:
TD201-500 Water supply for domestic and industrial purposes
Online Access:https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/32429/1/Water%20sources%20derived%20bio%20retting%20effect%20on%20kenaf%20fiber%20compositions%20_ABSTRACT.pdf
https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/32429/
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15440478.2021.1982829
https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2021.1982829
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.ums.eprints.32429
record_format eprints
spelling my.ums.eprints.324292022-04-25T03:12:06Z https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/32429/ Water sources derived bio retting effect on kenaf fiber compositions Mohammad Munir Hossain Md. Shafiquzzaman Siddiquee Vijay Kumar Subbiah TD201-500 Water supply for domestic and industrial purposes Concurrent eutrophication and scarcity of water have made the difficulties for kenaf retting; hence, seawater (SW), freshwater (FW), and municipal wastewater (MTW) were assessed for kenaf retting feasibility. SW retting liquor showed highest 1.39 × 108 CFU/mL bacterial loads on the 5th day, compared to FW 1.30 × 108 and MTW 1.25 × 108 CFU/mL on the seventh days retting period. SW solvents treated retting effluents showed maximum 13.68 U/mL pectinase enzyme activities. Based on un retted raw kenaf fiber (URKF) maximum fiber bundle weight was reported in MTW with 16.04% material losses, while the SW and FW treatments showed 24.38%, and 21.03% material losses, respectively. All solvents treated fiber samples showed smooth and cleaner fibers surface morphology by SEM indicates sufficient non cellulosic gums (NCGs) removal compared with URKF. Moreover, solvents retted fiber and URKF were examined for chemical composition, FTIR, and X-ray diffraction test. Results revealed that compared to URKF, solvents treated kenaf fiber increases 26.26 − 37.75% cellulose portions, and their crystallinity index increases 18.03–30.94% due to NCGs removal. This study’s findings indicate that along with FW the alternative macerating solvents SW and MTW were also feasible for kenaf bio retting, which could be a remediation for the mitigation of freshwater shortage. Taylor and Francis 2021 Article PeerReviewed text en https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/32429/1/Water%20sources%20derived%20bio%20retting%20effect%20on%20kenaf%20fiber%20compositions%20_ABSTRACT.pdf Mohammad Munir Hossain and Md. Shafiquzzaman Siddiquee and Vijay Kumar Subbiah (2021) Water sources derived bio retting effect on kenaf fiber compositions. Journal Of Natural Fibers. ISSN 1544-046X https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15440478.2021.1982829 https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2021.1982829
institution Universiti Malaysia Sabah
building UMS Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaysia Sabah
content_source UMS Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.ums.edu.my/
language English
topic TD201-500 Water supply for domestic and industrial purposes
spellingShingle TD201-500 Water supply for domestic and industrial purposes
Mohammad Munir Hossain
Md. Shafiquzzaman Siddiquee
Vijay Kumar Subbiah
Water sources derived bio retting effect on kenaf fiber compositions
description Concurrent eutrophication and scarcity of water have made the difficulties for kenaf retting; hence, seawater (SW), freshwater (FW), and municipal wastewater (MTW) were assessed for kenaf retting feasibility. SW retting liquor showed highest 1.39 × 108 CFU/mL bacterial loads on the 5th day, compared to FW 1.30 × 108 and MTW 1.25 × 108 CFU/mL on the seventh days retting period. SW solvents treated retting effluents showed maximum 13.68 U/mL pectinase enzyme activities. Based on un retted raw kenaf fiber (URKF) maximum fiber bundle weight was reported in MTW with 16.04% material losses, while the SW and FW treatments showed 24.38%, and 21.03% material losses, respectively. All solvents treated fiber samples showed smooth and cleaner fibers surface morphology by SEM indicates sufficient non cellulosic gums (NCGs) removal compared with URKF. Moreover, solvents retted fiber and URKF were examined for chemical composition, FTIR, and X-ray diffraction test. Results revealed that compared to URKF, solvents treated kenaf fiber increases 26.26 − 37.75% cellulose portions, and their crystallinity index increases 18.03–30.94% due to NCGs removal. This study’s findings indicate that along with FW the alternative macerating solvents SW and MTW were also feasible for kenaf bio retting, which could be a remediation for the mitigation of freshwater shortage.
format Article
author Mohammad Munir Hossain
Md. Shafiquzzaman Siddiquee
Vijay Kumar Subbiah
author_facet Mohammad Munir Hossain
Md. Shafiquzzaman Siddiquee
Vijay Kumar Subbiah
author_sort Mohammad Munir Hossain
title Water sources derived bio retting effect on kenaf fiber compositions
title_short Water sources derived bio retting effect on kenaf fiber compositions
title_full Water sources derived bio retting effect on kenaf fiber compositions
title_fullStr Water sources derived bio retting effect on kenaf fiber compositions
title_full_unstemmed Water sources derived bio retting effect on kenaf fiber compositions
title_sort water sources derived bio retting effect on kenaf fiber compositions
publisher Taylor and Francis
publishDate 2021
url https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/32429/1/Water%20sources%20derived%20bio%20retting%20effect%20on%20kenaf%20fiber%20compositions%20_ABSTRACT.pdf
https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/32429/
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15440478.2021.1982829
https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2021.1982829
_version_ 1760231024882614272
score 13.211869

Similar Items