Cover Image

The Roles of Collaborative Dialogue in Enhancing Written Corrective Feedback Efficacy

This paper discusses findings from a qualitative investigation to identify factors in relation to language-related episodes (LREs) that influence the uptake and retention in the accurate use of subject-verb agreement and prepositions resulting from indirect focused and indirect unfocused written c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Asiah, Kassim, Ng, Lee Luan
Format: Article
Language:English
English
Published: MELTA 2014
Subjects:
PE English
Online Access:http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/5878/1/pbmsk-asiah-The_Roles_of_Collaborative.pdf
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/5878/4/The%20Roles%20of%20Collaborative%20Dialogue%20in%20Enhancing%20Written%20Corrective%20Feedback%20Efficacy.pdf
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/5878/
http://www.melta.org.my/majer/vol10/kassim.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.ump.umpir.5878
record_format eprints
spelling my.ump.umpir.58782018-02-19T04:20:37Z http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/5878/ The Roles of Collaborative Dialogue in Enhancing Written Corrective Feedback Efficacy Asiah, Kassim Ng, Lee Luan PE English This paper discusses findings from a qualitative investigation to identify factors in relation to language-related episodes (LREs) that influence the uptake and retention in the accurate use of subject-verb agreement and prepositions resulting from indirect focused and indirect unfocused written corrective feedback. In relation to these identified factors, the roles of collaborative dialogue were determined through the analyses of the LREs and the interviews with selected participants. The participants in the study who received either focused or unfocused indirect corrective feedback for their written work were required to revise their work collaboratively during the pair talk. Findings from the analyses of the two data sources suggest that collaborative dialogue played a crucial role in enhancing the corrective feedback efficacy in facilitating participants’ language learning development. Primarily, collaborative dialogue enhanced learners’ focus towards ungrammatical uses in written work. Working collaboratively also provided learners with means to extensively deliberate over the corrections, which led to insightful reflections on their existing linguistic knowledge in response to the corrective feedback that they received for their written work. MELTA 2014-04 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/5878/1/pbmsk-asiah-The_Roles_of_Collaborative.pdf application/pdf en http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/5878/4/The%20Roles%20of%20Collaborative%20Dialogue%20in%20Enhancing%20Written%20Corrective%20Feedback%20Efficacy.pdf Asiah, Kassim and Ng, Lee Luan (2014) The Roles of Collaborative Dialogue in Enhancing Written Corrective Feedback Efficacy. Malaysia Journal of ELT Research, 10 (1). pp. 16-30. ISSN 1511-8002 http://www.melta.org.my/majer/vol10/kassim.pdf
institution Universiti Malaysia Pahang
building UMP Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaysia Pahang
content_source UMP Institutional Repository
url_provider http://umpir.ump.edu.my/
language English
English
topic PE English
spellingShingle PE English
Asiah, Kassim
Ng, Lee Luan
The Roles of Collaborative Dialogue in Enhancing Written Corrective Feedback Efficacy
description This paper discusses findings from a qualitative investigation to identify factors in relation to language-related episodes (LREs) that influence the uptake and retention in the accurate use of subject-verb agreement and prepositions resulting from indirect focused and indirect unfocused written corrective feedback. In relation to these identified factors, the roles of collaborative dialogue were determined through the analyses of the LREs and the interviews with selected participants. The participants in the study who received either focused or unfocused indirect corrective feedback for their written work were required to revise their work collaboratively during the pair talk. Findings from the analyses of the two data sources suggest that collaborative dialogue played a crucial role in enhancing the corrective feedback efficacy in facilitating participants’ language learning development. Primarily, collaborative dialogue enhanced learners’ focus towards ungrammatical uses in written work. Working collaboratively also provided learners with means to extensively deliberate over the corrections, which led to insightful reflections on their existing linguistic knowledge in response to the corrective feedback that they received for their written work.
format Article
author Asiah, Kassim
Ng, Lee Luan
author_facet Asiah, Kassim
Ng, Lee Luan
author_sort Asiah, Kassim
title The Roles of Collaborative Dialogue in Enhancing Written Corrective Feedback Efficacy
title_short The Roles of Collaborative Dialogue in Enhancing Written Corrective Feedback Efficacy
title_full The Roles of Collaborative Dialogue in Enhancing Written Corrective Feedback Efficacy
title_fullStr The Roles of Collaborative Dialogue in Enhancing Written Corrective Feedback Efficacy
title_full_unstemmed The Roles of Collaborative Dialogue in Enhancing Written Corrective Feedback Efficacy
title_sort roles of collaborative dialogue in enhancing written corrective feedback efficacy
publisher MELTA
publishDate 2014
url http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/5878/1/pbmsk-asiah-The_Roles_of_Collaborative.pdf
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/5878/4/The%20Roles%20of%20Collaborative%20Dialogue%20in%20Enhancing%20Written%20Corrective%20Feedback%20Efficacy.pdf
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/5878/
http://www.melta.org.my/majer/vol10/kassim.pdf
_version_ 1643665265841405952
score 13.211869

Similar Items