Cover Image

Composition of fatty acid methyl ester in microalgae Chlorella vulgaris : Comparison between various methods of harvesting, extraction and transesterification

The aim of the study was to identify which of methods produces the highest yield of fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) from microalgae. Different methods of harvesting (centrifugation, Cen & coagulation, Co), extraction (Test Tube, TT & Soxhlet, Sox) and transesterification (direct transesterifi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nur Hidayah, Mat Yasin, Muhammad Azril, Mohd Yusop, Nur Afiqah Ayuni, Awang Kechik, Amirin Zarif, Zahuri
Format: Article
Language:English
English
Published: Elsevier Ltd 2023
Subjects:
QD Chemistry
T Technology (General)
TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
TP Chemical technology
Online Access:http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/40410/1/Composition%20of%20fatty%20acid%20methyl%20ester%20in%20microalgae%20Chlorella.pdf
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/40410/2/Composition%20of%20fatty%20acid%20methyl%20ester%20in%20microalgae%20Chlorella%20vulgaris_Comparison%20between%20various%20methods%20of%20harvesting%2C%20extraction%20and%20transesterification_ABS.pdf
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/40410/
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2023.04.317
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2023.04.317
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.ump.umpir.40410
record_format eprints
spelling my.ump.umpir.404102024-04-16T04:23:27Z http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/40410/ Composition of fatty acid methyl ester in microalgae Chlorella vulgaris : Comparison between various methods of harvesting, extraction and transesterification Nur Hidayah, Mat Yasin Muhammad Azril, Mohd Yusop Nur Afiqah Ayuni, Awang Kechik Amirin Zarif, Zahuri QD Chemistry T Technology (General) TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) TP Chemical technology The aim of the study was to identify which of methods produces the highest yield of fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) from microalgae. Different methods of harvesting (centrifugation, Cen & coagulation, Co), extraction (Test Tube, TT & Soxhlet, Sox) and transesterification (direct transesterification, d-trans & extraction transesterification, ext-trans) were considered. The procedures of this research consists of microalgae cultivation, harvesting of biomass and extraction of oil to obtain the lipid. The further process of converting lipid into FAME is followed by transesterification process. The FAME compositions of Chlorella vulgaris were analyzed using Gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC–MS). The main components were consists of palmitic, stearic and oleic acids for both transesterification methods. However, FAME extracted from d-trans contained more components (linoleic and linolenic acid) than ext-trans. Furthermore, the highest amount of FAME gained by ext-trans was produced by the method of centrifugation-test tube (Cen-TT). Although Cen-TT produced the highest amount of FAME for ext-trans, it still cannot meet the highest amount of FAME produced by d-trans. Therefore, the Cen-TT method was selected to be the best microalgae harvesting and extraction method in ext-trans meanwhile the most efficient transesterification method was d-trans. Elsevier Ltd 2023 Article PeerReviewed pdf en http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/40410/1/Composition%20of%20fatty%20acid%20methyl%20ester%20in%20microalgae%20Chlorella.pdf pdf en http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/40410/2/Composition%20of%20fatty%20acid%20methyl%20ester%20in%20microalgae%20Chlorella%20vulgaris_Comparison%20between%20various%20methods%20of%20harvesting%2C%20extraction%20and%20transesterification_ABS.pdf Nur Hidayah, Mat Yasin and Muhammad Azril, Mohd Yusop and Nur Afiqah Ayuni, Awang Kechik and Amirin Zarif, Zahuri (2023) Composition of fatty acid methyl ester in microalgae Chlorella vulgaris : Comparison between various methods of harvesting, extraction and transesterification. Materials Today: Proceedings. pp. 1-7. ISSN 2214-7853. (In Press / Online First) (In Press / Online First) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2023.04.317 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2023.04.317
institution Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah
building UMPSA Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah
content_source UMPSA Institutional Repository
url_provider http://umpir.ump.edu.my/
language English
English
topic QD Chemistry
T Technology (General)
TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
TP Chemical technology
spellingShingle QD Chemistry
T Technology (General)
TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
TP Chemical technology
Nur Hidayah, Mat Yasin
Muhammad Azril, Mohd Yusop
Nur Afiqah Ayuni, Awang Kechik
Amirin Zarif, Zahuri
Composition of fatty acid methyl ester in microalgae Chlorella vulgaris : Comparison between various methods of harvesting, extraction and transesterification
description The aim of the study was to identify which of methods produces the highest yield of fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) from microalgae. Different methods of harvesting (centrifugation, Cen & coagulation, Co), extraction (Test Tube, TT & Soxhlet, Sox) and transesterification (direct transesterification, d-trans & extraction transesterification, ext-trans) were considered. The procedures of this research consists of microalgae cultivation, harvesting of biomass and extraction of oil to obtain the lipid. The further process of converting lipid into FAME is followed by transesterification process. The FAME compositions of Chlorella vulgaris were analyzed using Gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC–MS). The main components were consists of palmitic, stearic and oleic acids for both transesterification methods. However, FAME extracted from d-trans contained more components (linoleic and linolenic acid) than ext-trans. Furthermore, the highest amount of FAME gained by ext-trans was produced by the method of centrifugation-test tube (Cen-TT). Although Cen-TT produced the highest amount of FAME for ext-trans, it still cannot meet the highest amount of FAME produced by d-trans. Therefore, the Cen-TT method was selected to be the best microalgae harvesting and extraction method in ext-trans meanwhile the most efficient transesterification method was d-trans.
format Article
author Nur Hidayah, Mat Yasin
Muhammad Azril, Mohd Yusop
Nur Afiqah Ayuni, Awang Kechik
Amirin Zarif, Zahuri
author_facet Nur Hidayah, Mat Yasin
Muhammad Azril, Mohd Yusop
Nur Afiqah Ayuni, Awang Kechik
Amirin Zarif, Zahuri
author_sort Nur Hidayah, Mat Yasin
title Composition of fatty acid methyl ester in microalgae Chlorella vulgaris : Comparison between various methods of harvesting, extraction and transesterification
title_short Composition of fatty acid methyl ester in microalgae Chlorella vulgaris : Comparison between various methods of harvesting, extraction and transesterification
title_full Composition of fatty acid methyl ester in microalgae Chlorella vulgaris : Comparison between various methods of harvesting, extraction and transesterification
title_fullStr Composition of fatty acid methyl ester in microalgae Chlorella vulgaris : Comparison between various methods of harvesting, extraction and transesterification
title_full_unstemmed Composition of fatty acid methyl ester in microalgae Chlorella vulgaris : Comparison between various methods of harvesting, extraction and transesterification
title_sort composition of fatty acid methyl ester in microalgae chlorella vulgaris : comparison between various methods of harvesting, extraction and transesterification
publisher Elsevier Ltd
publishDate 2023
url http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/40410/1/Composition%20of%20fatty%20acid%20methyl%20ester%20in%20microalgae%20Chlorella.pdf
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/40410/2/Composition%20of%20fatty%20acid%20methyl%20ester%20in%20microalgae%20Chlorella%20vulgaris_Comparison%20between%20various%20methods%20of%20harvesting%2C%20extraction%20and%20transesterification_ABS.pdf
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/40410/
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2023.04.317
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2023.04.317
_version_ 1822924229272666112
score 13.244413

Similar Items