A comprehensive performance evaluation of MIPv6 and PMIPv6 mobility management protocols in wireless mesh network

Wireless communication is becoming essential due to the dramatic increase in the usage of mobile devices. The high demand for real-time or instant services requires wireless Internet networks which can support different Quality of Service (QoS) guarantees and different traffic characteristics. All I...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hoh, Wei Siang, Yoon, Si-Kee, Ong, Bi-Lynn, Ahmad, R. Badlishah
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Computer Science and Information Technology, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/32750/2/A%20comprehensive%20performance%20evaluation%20of%20MIPv6%20and%20PMIPv6%20mobility%20management_full.pdf
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/32750/
https://doi.org/10.32985/ijeces.12.si.1
https://doi.org/10.32985/ijeces.12.si.1
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.ump.umpir.32750
record_format eprints
spelling my.ump.umpir.327502022-02-09T08:18:41Z http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/32750/ A comprehensive performance evaluation of MIPv6 and PMIPv6 mobility management protocols in wireless mesh network Hoh, Wei Siang Yoon, Si-Kee Ong, Bi-Lynn Ahmad, R. Badlishah QA76 Computer software Wireless communication is becoming essential due to the dramatic increase in the usage of mobile devices. The high demand for real-time or instant services requires wireless Internet networks which can support different Quality of Service (QoS) guarantees and different traffic characteristics. All Internet network mobile device services are supported by mobility management protocols. In this paper, we compare the performance of the MIPv6 and PMIPv6 mobility management protocols in the Wireless Mesh Network (WMN) environment. We identify and analyze the MIPv6 and PMIPv6 mobility management protocols' characteristics by using performance indicators. The performance comparison of MIPv6 and PMIPv6 mobility management protocols was conducted in terms of throughput, latency, and packet loss ratio. Based on the conducted experimental results, we summarize the performances for MIPv6 and PMIPv6 mobility management protocols in the Wireless Mesh Network environment. The results obtained indicate that PMIPv6 generally outperforms MIPv6. In future work, the evaluation of HMPIv6, FMIPv6, and FHMIPv6 is proposed. Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Computer Science and Information Technology, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek 2021-11-02 Article PeerReviewed pdf en http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/32750/2/A%20comprehensive%20performance%20evaluation%20of%20MIPv6%20and%20PMIPv6%20mobility%20management_full.pdf Hoh, Wei Siang and Yoon, Si-Kee and Ong, Bi-Lynn and Ahmad, R. Badlishah (2021) A comprehensive performance evaluation of MIPv6 and PMIPv6 mobility management protocols in wireless mesh network. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering Systems, 12 (2021: ICICTM). pp. 1-8. ISSN 1847-6996 https://doi.org/10.32985/ijeces.12.si.1 https://doi.org/10.32985/ijeces.12.si.1
institution Universiti Malaysia Pahang
building UMP Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaysia Pahang
content_source UMP Institutional Repository
url_provider http://umpir.ump.edu.my/
language English
topic QA76 Computer software
spellingShingle QA76 Computer software
Hoh, Wei Siang
Yoon, Si-Kee
Ong, Bi-Lynn
Ahmad, R. Badlishah
A comprehensive performance evaluation of MIPv6 and PMIPv6 mobility management protocols in wireless mesh network
description Wireless communication is becoming essential due to the dramatic increase in the usage of mobile devices. The high demand for real-time or instant services requires wireless Internet networks which can support different Quality of Service (QoS) guarantees and different traffic characteristics. All Internet network mobile device services are supported by mobility management protocols. In this paper, we compare the performance of the MIPv6 and PMIPv6 mobility management protocols in the Wireless Mesh Network (WMN) environment. We identify and analyze the MIPv6 and PMIPv6 mobility management protocols' characteristics by using performance indicators. The performance comparison of MIPv6 and PMIPv6 mobility management protocols was conducted in terms of throughput, latency, and packet loss ratio. Based on the conducted experimental results, we summarize the performances for MIPv6 and PMIPv6 mobility management protocols in the Wireless Mesh Network environment. The results obtained indicate that PMIPv6 generally outperforms MIPv6. In future work, the evaluation of HMPIv6, FMIPv6, and FHMIPv6 is proposed.
format Article
author Hoh, Wei Siang
Yoon, Si-Kee
Ong, Bi-Lynn
Ahmad, R. Badlishah
author_facet Hoh, Wei Siang
Yoon, Si-Kee
Ong, Bi-Lynn
Ahmad, R. Badlishah
author_sort Hoh, Wei Siang
title A comprehensive performance evaluation of MIPv6 and PMIPv6 mobility management protocols in wireless mesh network
title_short A comprehensive performance evaluation of MIPv6 and PMIPv6 mobility management protocols in wireless mesh network
title_full A comprehensive performance evaluation of MIPv6 and PMIPv6 mobility management protocols in wireless mesh network
title_fullStr A comprehensive performance evaluation of MIPv6 and PMIPv6 mobility management protocols in wireless mesh network
title_full_unstemmed A comprehensive performance evaluation of MIPv6 and PMIPv6 mobility management protocols in wireless mesh network
title_sort comprehensive performance evaluation of mipv6 and pmipv6 mobility management protocols in wireless mesh network
publisher Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Computer Science and Information Technology, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek
publishDate 2021
url http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/32750/2/A%20comprehensive%20performance%20evaluation%20of%20MIPv6%20and%20PMIPv6%20mobility%20management_full.pdf
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/32750/
https://doi.org/10.32985/ijeces.12.si.1
https://doi.org/10.32985/ijeces.12.si.1
_version_ 1724608136871936000
score 13.211869