Hysteresis, PI and Ramptime Current Control Techniques for APF: An experimental comparison

This paper presents an experimental comparison of three current control techniques, namely Hysteresis, PI and Ramptime Current Control Techniques. The testing platform is a 300 W shunt active power filter with diode rectifier load. Results are analysed both in the time domain and the frequency domai...

全面介绍

Saved in:
书目详细资料
Main Authors: Hamdan, Daniyal, Lam, Eric, J. Borle, Lawrence, Iu, Herbert H. C.
格式: Conference or Workshop Item
语言:English
出版: IEEE 2011
主题:
在线阅读:http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/26126/1/Hysteresis%2C%20PI%20and%20Ramptime%20Current%20Control%20Techniques%20for%20APF.pdf
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/26126/
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIEA.2011.5975947
标签: 添加标签
没有标签, 成为第一个标记此记录!
实物特征
总结:This paper presents an experimental comparison of three current control techniques, namely Hysteresis, PI and Ramptime Current Control Techniques. The testing platform is a 300 W shunt active power filter with diode rectifier load. Results are analysed both in the time domain and the frequency domain. The pros and cons of each of the above mentioned current control techniques are discussed. It is found that Ramptime Current Control is capable of incorporating the advantages of the two other control techniques with negligible shortcomings.