Cover Image

Evaluation of Different Polymeric Membrane Support for Acetic Acid Removal by Supported Liquid Membrane ProcesS

In this study, the removal of acetic acid from aqueous solution through supported liquid membrane (SLM) process by using tri-n-octylamine (TOA) as a carrier and sodium hydroxide as a stripping agent was conducted. Acetic acid can inhibit the microbial activity during fermentation process of biomass...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Norlisa, Harruddin, Syed Mohd Saufi, Tuan Chik, C. K. M., Faizal, Abdul Wahab, Mohammad
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia 2016
Subjects:
TP Chemical technology
Online Access:http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/16764/1/Evaluation_of_different_polymeric_membrane_supportedit.pdf
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/16764/
http://dx.doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.10046
http://dx.doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.10046
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.ump.umpir.16764
record_format eprints
spelling my.ump.umpir.167642020-03-02T03:27:44Z http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/16764/ Evaluation of Different Polymeric Membrane Support for Acetic Acid Removal by Supported Liquid Membrane ProcesS Norlisa, Harruddin Syed Mohd Saufi, Tuan Chik C. K. M., Faizal Abdul Wahab, Mohammad TP Chemical technology In this study, the removal of acetic acid from aqueous solution through supported liquid membrane (SLM) process by using tri-n-octylamine (TOA) as a carrier and sodium hydroxide as a stripping agent was conducted. Acetic acid can inhibit the microbial activity during fermentation process of biomass hydrolysate, thus decreasing the bioethanol production. It is crucial to remove acetic acid prior to fermentation process in order to increase the yield of bioethanol from biomass resources. In this study, the removal of acetic acid was conducted using different types of polymeric membrane in supported liquid membrane process. Three types of polymeric membranes support which are polyethersulfone (PES), polysulfone (PSF) and polyvinyflouride (PVDF) prepared by vapour induced phase separation (VIPS) were used as a support material. The types of polymer give a significant effect on membrane morphology and its physical characteristics. PES exhibited a porous membrane support with a symmetric structure and high contact angle. Almost 86% of 10 g/l of acetic acid was successfully removed by using PES as a support membrane, compared to the 6% and 38% removal using PSF and PVDF membrane, respectively. Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia 2016 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/16764/1/Evaluation_of_different_polymeric_membrane_supportedit.pdf Norlisa, Harruddin and Syed Mohd Saufi, Tuan Chik and C. K. M., Faizal and Abdul Wahab, Mohammad (2016) Evaluation of Different Polymeric Membrane Support for Acetic Acid Removal by Supported Liquid Membrane ProcesS. Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences and Engineering), 78 (12). pp. 13-18. ISSN 0127-9696 (Print); 2180-3722 (Online) http://dx.doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.10046 http://dx.doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.10046
institution Universiti Malaysia Pahang
building UMP Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaysia Pahang
content_source UMP Institutional Repository
url_provider http://umpir.ump.edu.my/
language English
topic TP Chemical technology
spellingShingle TP Chemical technology
Norlisa, Harruddin
Syed Mohd Saufi, Tuan Chik
C. K. M., Faizal
Abdul Wahab, Mohammad
Evaluation of Different Polymeric Membrane Support for Acetic Acid Removal by Supported Liquid Membrane ProcesS
description In this study, the removal of acetic acid from aqueous solution through supported liquid membrane (SLM) process by using tri-n-octylamine (TOA) as a carrier and sodium hydroxide as a stripping agent was conducted. Acetic acid can inhibit the microbial activity during fermentation process of biomass hydrolysate, thus decreasing the bioethanol production. It is crucial to remove acetic acid prior to fermentation process in order to increase the yield of bioethanol from biomass resources. In this study, the removal of acetic acid was conducted using different types of polymeric membrane in supported liquid membrane process. Three types of polymeric membranes support which are polyethersulfone (PES), polysulfone (PSF) and polyvinyflouride (PVDF) prepared by vapour induced phase separation (VIPS) were used as a support material. The types of polymer give a significant effect on membrane morphology and its physical characteristics. PES exhibited a porous membrane support with a symmetric structure and high contact angle. Almost 86% of 10 g/l of acetic acid was successfully removed by using PES as a support membrane, compared to the 6% and 38% removal using PSF and PVDF membrane, respectively.
format Article
author Norlisa, Harruddin
Syed Mohd Saufi, Tuan Chik
C. K. M., Faizal
Abdul Wahab, Mohammad
author_facet Norlisa, Harruddin
Syed Mohd Saufi, Tuan Chik
C. K. M., Faizal
Abdul Wahab, Mohammad
author_sort Norlisa, Harruddin
title Evaluation of Different Polymeric Membrane Support for Acetic Acid Removal by Supported Liquid Membrane ProcesS
title_short Evaluation of Different Polymeric Membrane Support for Acetic Acid Removal by Supported Liquid Membrane ProcesS
title_full Evaluation of Different Polymeric Membrane Support for Acetic Acid Removal by Supported Liquid Membrane ProcesS
title_fullStr Evaluation of Different Polymeric Membrane Support for Acetic Acid Removal by Supported Liquid Membrane ProcesS
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Different Polymeric Membrane Support for Acetic Acid Removal by Supported Liquid Membrane ProcesS
title_sort evaluation of different polymeric membrane support for acetic acid removal by supported liquid membrane process
publisher Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
publishDate 2016
url http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/16764/1/Evaluation_of_different_polymeric_membrane_supportedit.pdf
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/16764/
http://dx.doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.10046
http://dx.doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.10046
_version_ 1662754696958312448
score 13.211869

Similar Items