Cover Image

Study on The Comparison of Soil Properties in Grazing And Non-Grazing Cattle Integration Oil Palm Project

The site for this experiment was conducted at Ladang ESPEK Risda Durian Mas, Dungun, Terengganu. The biggest reason why I'm doing on that farm is because they have a very systematic integrated farming which much or less affects my research. The objective of this experiment was to compare the or...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Muhammad Iqbal Ali Akbar
Format: Undergraduate Final Project Report
Published: 2015
Online Access:http://discol.umk.edu.my/id/eprint/6172/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.umk.eprints.6172
record_format eprints
spelling my.umk.eprints.61722022-05-23T08:45:36Z http://discol.umk.edu.my/id/eprint/6172/ Study on The Comparison of Soil Properties in Grazing And Non-Grazing Cattle Integration Oil Palm Project Muhammad Iqbal Ali Akbar The site for this experiment was conducted at Ladang ESPEK Risda Durian Mas, Dungun, Terengganu. The biggest reason why I'm doing on that farm is because they have a very systematic integrated farming which much or less affects my research. The objective of this experiment was to compare the organic matter and nutrient level on non-grazing and grazing area. Theoretically, grazing area should have high value of organic matter. But based on the experiments, non-grazing area and constant area have the highest value of organic matter (7.2053) and (6.4513) respectively. The nutrient level stored in the soil also been proved by testing on the lab. Nitrogen and Potassium has the highest concentration stored in soil (41 mg/I) and (86.3) respectively. The pH level also showed that the area that implemented a cattle integration can affects the acidity of soil. At grazing area the high pH recorded was (4.00) and for non-grazing and constant farm, both of them were recorded to have (4.16) and (4.21) respectively. The cattle integration also plays a part in determination of soil moisture. The water content recorded in both non-grazing and constant farm was (52.28%) and (55.85%). This showed that the porosity at non-grazing and grazing area was high compared to grazing area. This is due to the implementation of cattle integration on that farm. The cattle eventually trampled the soil and compact the soil even harder. 2015 Undergraduate Final Project Report NonPeerReviewed Muhammad Iqbal Ali Akbar (2015) Study on The Comparison of Soil Properties in Grazing And Non-Grazing Cattle Integration Oil Palm Project. Undergraduate Final Project Report thesis, Faculty of Agro - Based Industry. (Submitted)
institution Universiti Malaysia Kelantan
building Perpustakaan Universiti Malaysia Kelantan
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaysia Kelantan
content_source UMK Institutional Repository
url_provider http://umkeprints.umk.edu.my/
description The site for this experiment was conducted at Ladang ESPEK Risda Durian Mas, Dungun, Terengganu. The biggest reason why I'm doing on that farm is because they have a very systematic integrated farming which much or less affects my research. The objective of this experiment was to compare the organic matter and nutrient level on non-grazing and grazing area. Theoretically, grazing area should have high value of organic matter. But based on the experiments, non-grazing area and constant area have the highest value of organic matter (7.2053) and (6.4513) respectively. The nutrient level stored in the soil also been proved by testing on the lab. Nitrogen and Potassium has the highest concentration stored in soil (41 mg/I) and (86.3) respectively. The pH level also showed that the area that implemented a cattle integration can affects the acidity of soil. At grazing area the high pH recorded was (4.00) and for non-grazing and constant farm, both of them were recorded to have (4.16) and (4.21) respectively. The cattle integration also plays a part in determination of soil moisture. The water content recorded in both non-grazing and constant farm was (52.28%) and (55.85%). This showed that the porosity at non-grazing and grazing area was high compared to grazing area. This is due to the implementation of cattle integration on that farm. The cattle eventually trampled the soil and compact the soil even harder.
format Undergraduate Final Project Report
author Muhammad Iqbal Ali Akbar
spellingShingle Muhammad Iqbal Ali Akbar
Study on The Comparison of Soil Properties in Grazing And Non-Grazing Cattle Integration Oil Palm Project
author_facet Muhammad Iqbal Ali Akbar
author_sort Muhammad Iqbal Ali Akbar
title Study on The Comparison of Soil Properties in Grazing And Non-Grazing Cattle Integration Oil Palm Project
title_short Study on The Comparison of Soil Properties in Grazing And Non-Grazing Cattle Integration Oil Palm Project
title_full Study on The Comparison of Soil Properties in Grazing And Non-Grazing Cattle Integration Oil Palm Project
title_fullStr Study on The Comparison of Soil Properties in Grazing And Non-Grazing Cattle Integration Oil Palm Project
title_full_unstemmed Study on The Comparison of Soil Properties in Grazing And Non-Grazing Cattle Integration Oil Palm Project
title_sort study on the comparison of soil properties in grazing and non-grazing cattle integration oil palm project
publishDate 2015
url http://discol.umk.edu.my/id/eprint/6172/
_version_ 1763303658597908480
score 13.211869

Similar Items