Development of construction waste indices in Malaysia / Ahmad Firman Masudi
Construction waste can be considered as one of the main factors that can give serious environmental impacts. High demand of infrastructure and building projects implementation, especially in the commercial and housing building, become the main contributors for construction waste generation in Mal...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis |
| Published: |
2013
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://studentsrepo.um.edu.my/12186/4/firman.pdf http://studentsrepo.um.edu.my/12186/ |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Construction waste can be considered as one of the main factors that can give
serious environmental impacts. High demand of infrastructure and building projects
implementation, especially in the commercial and housing building, become the main
contributors for construction waste generation in Malaysia. There is a need for
Malaysian construction industry to strive for the establishment of benchmark figures
and strong database for national construction waste generation and its associated
impacts. The objectives of this study are: to identify the benchmark value for the extent
of wastage (wastage level and waste index), carbon footprint index (CFI), and ecocosts/
value ratio (EVR) as indicators for environmental loads (global warming impact)
and environmental burden prevention cost in Klang Valley. Five projects in Klang
Valley constructed between 2009 through 2010 had been selected for this study, which
mainly include institutional, residential, and commercial building projects conducted by
a wide range of contractors employing conventional and Industrialized Building System
(IBS) systems. Major waste that generated at significant amount, such as concrete,
timber, reinforcement bars, bricks & blocks, tiles, and plaster/mortars were taken into
account. Only waste generated from construction activities at superstructure-phase was
considered. Data used for the study was collected in three ways: interviews with key
personnel, observational site visits, and reviews of project documentation. Benchmark
for waste index for chosen sites shall fall between 0.0339 - 0.1497 m3/m2. Benchmark
wastage levels for each specified material should fall around an average of 5 – 6 % and
up to as high as 10%, except for timber. Waste index are merely governed by the waste
management practice performed, type of building, size, and cost of the respected
project. Benchmarks for wastage CFI shall range between 21 – 26 kg CO2/m2 for
typical conventional projects and it shall be less for full IBS projects. Benchmarks for
wastage EVR benchmarks shall fall between 0.0024 – 0.0028 for typical multi-storey
projects and less for composite or full-extent IBS projects. Construction method, waste
management, and type of building play a major role in CFI and EVR outcomes. Lowend
projects tend to generate less waste index due to minor size and cost of the building,
but not necessarily produce lower impacts. Residential and fully IBS project are proven
to be the most sustainable, in terms of impacts. However, only small portion of
demands are in favors for this type of project as they can be categorized as high-end
(high-cost) projects. These multi-indicators assessments shall provide comprehensive
and integrated evaluations for consequences and environmental loads of construction
waste generation. Results of this study illustrate that the baseline figures are highly
contrast and scattered, which show inconsistencies of sustainability level demonstrated
among construction players. For that reason, benchmark figures shall be established by
authorities and shall be achieved by construction players. Construction players shall put
more emphasize on “designing-out” waste, rather than focusing on “end-of-pipeline”
waste management. Implementation of IBS system was concluded as the most effective
measures to minimize extent of wastage and associated impacts/losses resulted from
construction waste generation as proven in this study. |
|---|