Large-scale comparison of intron positions among animal, plant, and fungal genes

We purge large databases of animal, plant, and fungal intron-containing genes to a 20% similarity level and then identify the most similar animal-plant, animal-fungal, and plant-fungal protein pairs. We identify the introns in each BLAST 2.0 alignment and score matched intron positions and slid (nea...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fedorov, A., Gilbert, W., Merican, A.F.
Format: Article
Published: 2002
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.um.edu.my/4947/
http://www.pnas.org/content/99/25/16128.full.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.um.eprints.4947
record_format eprints
spelling my.um.eprints.49472014-10-20T01:44:31Z http://eprints.um.edu.my/4947/ Large-scale comparison of intron positions among animal, plant, and fungal genes Fedorov, A. Gilbert, W. Merican, A.F. QH301 Biology We purge large databases of animal, plant, and fungal intron-containing genes to a 20% similarity level and then identify the most similar animal-plant, animal-fungal, and plant-fungal protein pairs. We identify the introns in each BLAST 2.0 alignment and score matched intron positions and slid (near-matched, within six nucleotides) intron positions automatically. Overall we find that 10% of the animal introns match plant positions, and a further 7% are "slides." Fifteen percent of fungal introns match animal positions, and 13% match plant positions. Furthermore, the number of alignments with high numbers of matches deviates greatly from the Poisson expectation. The 30 animal-plant alignments with the highest matches (for which 44% of animal introns match plant positions) when aligned with fungal genes are also highly enriched for triple matches: 39% of the fungal introns match both animal and plant positions. This is strong evidence for ancestral introns predating the animal-plant-fungal divergence, and in complete opposition to any expectations based on random insertion. In examining the slid introns, we show that at least half are caused by imperfections in the alignments, and are most likely to be actual matches at common positions. Thus, our final estimates are that approximate to14% of animal introns match plant positions, and that approximate to17-18% of fungal introns match animal or plant positions, all of these being likely to be ancestral in the eukaryotes. 2002 Article PeerReviewed Fedorov, A. and Gilbert, W. and Merican, A.F. (2002) Large-scale comparison of intron positions among animal, plant, and fungal genes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99 (25). pp. 16128-16133. ISSN 0027-8424 http://www.pnas.org/content/99/25/16128.full.pdf 10.1073/pnas.242624899
institution Universiti Malaya
building UM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaya
content_source UM Research Repository
url_provider http://eprints.um.edu.my/
topic QH301 Biology
spellingShingle QH301 Biology
Fedorov, A.
Gilbert, W.
Merican, A.F.
Large-scale comparison of intron positions among animal, plant, and fungal genes
description We purge large databases of animal, plant, and fungal intron-containing genes to a 20% similarity level and then identify the most similar animal-plant, animal-fungal, and plant-fungal protein pairs. We identify the introns in each BLAST 2.0 alignment and score matched intron positions and slid (near-matched, within six nucleotides) intron positions automatically. Overall we find that 10% of the animal introns match plant positions, and a further 7% are "slides." Fifteen percent of fungal introns match animal positions, and 13% match plant positions. Furthermore, the number of alignments with high numbers of matches deviates greatly from the Poisson expectation. The 30 animal-plant alignments with the highest matches (for which 44% of animal introns match plant positions) when aligned with fungal genes are also highly enriched for triple matches: 39% of the fungal introns match both animal and plant positions. This is strong evidence for ancestral introns predating the animal-plant-fungal divergence, and in complete opposition to any expectations based on random insertion. In examining the slid introns, we show that at least half are caused by imperfections in the alignments, and are most likely to be actual matches at common positions. Thus, our final estimates are that approximate to14% of animal introns match plant positions, and that approximate to17-18% of fungal introns match animal or plant positions, all of these being likely to be ancestral in the eukaryotes.
format Article
author Fedorov, A.
Gilbert, W.
Merican, A.F.
author_facet Fedorov, A.
Gilbert, W.
Merican, A.F.
author_sort Fedorov, A.
title Large-scale comparison of intron positions among animal, plant, and fungal genes
title_short Large-scale comparison of intron positions among animal, plant, and fungal genes
title_full Large-scale comparison of intron positions among animal, plant, and fungal genes
title_fullStr Large-scale comparison of intron positions among animal, plant, and fungal genes
title_full_unstemmed Large-scale comparison of intron positions among animal, plant, and fungal genes
title_sort large-scale comparison of intron positions among animal, plant, and fungal genes
publishDate 2002
url http://eprints.um.edu.my/4947/
http://www.pnas.org/content/99/25/16128.full.pdf
_version_ 1643687447596367872
score 13.211869