Carbon footprint evaluation of industrial wastes based solid fuel in the context of its use in a cement plant
Refuse Derived Fuel is energy derived from converting various wastes including municipal solid waste, industrial waste and other combustible components into alternative fuels as a coal substitute. This sustainable technology can significantly reduce the carbon footprint and provide additional enviro...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Published: |
Springer Netherlands
2022
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://eprints.um.edu.my/42007/ |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Refuse Derived Fuel is energy derived from converting various wastes including municipal solid waste, industrial waste and other combustible components into alternative fuels as a coal substitute. This sustainable technology can significantly reduce the carbon footprint and provide additional environmental credentials, as, without these energy recovery techniques, the non-recyclable waste would be disposed of in landfills or incinerated. Therefore, this study aimed to estimate the carbon footprint of industrial wastes-based solid fuel (IWSF) using a life cycle assessment approach developed using a mixture of hazardous waste and biomass. The utilization of hazardous waste to produce solid fuel and its usage as a substitute fuel in cement kilns is relatively a novel approach. The simple and structured carbon footprint method used in this study has considered the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the transportation of waste, manufacturing of IWSF, waste disposal, IWSF utilization in the cement manufacturing plant, and IWSF end of life. The feasibility of cofiring IWSF at a rate of 5 tons/h (10% of IWSF) with coal in the cement kiln and the GHG emissions associated with replacing the coal with IWSF are investigated. The overall carbon footprint of the IWSF is quantified in terms of greenhouse gas emissions and represented in carbon dioxide equivalents (CO(2)e). The evaluations estimated that the carbon footprint of using a mixture of IWSF and coal is equal to 0.185 kg CO(2)e. MJ(-1). The findings indicate that replacing solar panels and 70% of conventional fluorescent lamps at the IWSF manufacturing plant with LED bulbs could reduce 24.8% and 45.5% of energy, respectively. In summary, the results showed that cofiring IWSF at a rate of 5 tonnes/h in cement kilns could help reduce CO2 emissions, lower clinker production costs due to the use of cheaper fuel, and promote sustainability. GRAPHICS] . |
---|