Cover Image

Foley catheter compared with controlled release dinoprostone vaginal insert for labor induction after one previous cesarean delivery: A randomized trial

Objective To compare Foley catheter and controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal insert on induction-to-delivery interval and maternal satisfaction in women with one previous cesarean delivery. Methods This randomized controlled trial was conducted at the University Malaya Medical Center, Kuala Lumpu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sulaiman, Sofiah, Sivaranjani, Sanmugam, Razali, Nuguelis, Lim, Boon Kiong, Hamdan, Mukhri, Tan, Peng Chiong
Format: Article
Published: Elsevier 2023
Subjects:
R Medicine
RG Gynecology and obstetrics
Obstetrics
Online Access:http://eprints.um.edu.my/39484/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.um.eprints.39484
record_format eprints
spelling my.um.eprints.394842024-11-05T01:23:32Z http://eprints.um.edu.my/39484/ Foley catheter compared with controlled release dinoprostone vaginal insert for labor induction after one previous cesarean delivery: A randomized trial Sulaiman, Sofiah Sivaranjani, Sanmugam Razali, Nuguelis Lim, Boon Kiong Hamdan, Mukhri Tan, Peng Chiong R Medicine RG Gynecology and obstetrics Obstetrics Objective To compare Foley catheter and controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal insert on induction-to-delivery interval and maternal satisfaction in women with one previous cesarean delivery. Methods This randomized controlled trial was conducted at the University Malaya Medical Center, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, from December 12, 2018, to May 28, 2019. A total of 78 term women scheduled for labor induction with one previous cesarean delivery who had ripe cervixes, singleton gestation, cephalic presentation, intact membranes, and reassuring cardiotocogram were randomized to Foley catheter or dinoprostone insert. The primary outcome was induction-to-delivery interval (in hours) and the secondary outcomes included maternal satisfaction on birth experience (assessed by 100-mm visual analog scale). Results Induction-to-delivery intervals were as follows: median 33.5 h (interquartile range IQR], 26.1-36.2 h) versus 23.5 h (IQR, 12.7-34.5 h) (P = 0.004), and maternal satisfaction on birth process 100-mm visual analog Elsevier 2023-03 Article PeerReviewed Sulaiman, Sofiah and Sivaranjani, Sanmugam and Razali, Nuguelis and Lim, Boon Kiong and Hamdan, Mukhri and Tan, Peng Chiong (2023) Foley catheter compared with controlled release dinoprostone vaginal insert for labor induction after one previous cesarean delivery: A randomized trial. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 160 (3). pp. 814-822. ISSN 0020-7292, DOI https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.14364 <https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.14364>. 10.1002/ijgo.14364
institution Universiti Malaya
building UM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaya
content_source UM Research Repository
url_provider http://eprints.um.edu.my/
topic R Medicine
RG Gynecology and obstetrics
Obstetrics
spellingShingle R Medicine
RG Gynecology and obstetrics
Obstetrics
Sulaiman, Sofiah
Sivaranjani, Sanmugam
Razali, Nuguelis
Lim, Boon Kiong
Hamdan, Mukhri
Tan, Peng Chiong
Foley catheter compared with controlled release dinoprostone vaginal insert for labor induction after one previous cesarean delivery: A randomized trial
description Objective To compare Foley catheter and controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal insert on induction-to-delivery interval and maternal satisfaction in women with one previous cesarean delivery. Methods This randomized controlled trial was conducted at the University Malaya Medical Center, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, from December 12, 2018, to May 28, 2019. A total of 78 term women scheduled for labor induction with one previous cesarean delivery who had ripe cervixes, singleton gestation, cephalic presentation, intact membranes, and reassuring cardiotocogram were randomized to Foley catheter or dinoprostone insert. The primary outcome was induction-to-delivery interval (in hours) and the secondary outcomes included maternal satisfaction on birth experience (assessed by 100-mm visual analog scale). Results Induction-to-delivery intervals were as follows: median 33.5 h (interquartile range IQR], 26.1-36.2 h) versus 23.5 h (IQR, 12.7-34.5 h) (P = 0.004), and maternal satisfaction on birth process 100-mm visual analog
format Article
author Sulaiman, Sofiah
Sivaranjani, Sanmugam
Razali, Nuguelis
Lim, Boon Kiong
Hamdan, Mukhri
Tan, Peng Chiong
author_facet Sulaiman, Sofiah
Sivaranjani, Sanmugam
Razali, Nuguelis
Lim, Boon Kiong
Hamdan, Mukhri
Tan, Peng Chiong
author_sort Sulaiman, Sofiah
title Foley catheter compared with controlled release dinoprostone vaginal insert for labor induction after one previous cesarean delivery: A randomized trial
title_short Foley catheter compared with controlled release dinoprostone vaginal insert for labor induction after one previous cesarean delivery: A randomized trial
title_full Foley catheter compared with controlled release dinoprostone vaginal insert for labor induction after one previous cesarean delivery: A randomized trial
title_fullStr Foley catheter compared with controlled release dinoprostone vaginal insert for labor induction after one previous cesarean delivery: A randomized trial
title_full_unstemmed Foley catheter compared with controlled release dinoprostone vaginal insert for labor induction after one previous cesarean delivery: A randomized trial
title_sort foley catheter compared with controlled release dinoprostone vaginal insert for labor induction after one previous cesarean delivery: a randomized trial
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2023
url http://eprints.um.edu.my/39484/
_version_ 1814933270039625728
score 13.211869

Similar Items