Acceptability of bisphosphonates among patients, clinicians and managers: A systematic review and framework synthesis

Objective To explore the acceptability of different bisphosphonate regimens for the treatment of osteoporosis among patients, clinicians and managers, payers and academics. Design A systematic review of primary qualitative studies. Seven databases were searched from inception to July 2019. Screening...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Paskins, Zoe, Crawford-Manning, Fay, Cottrell, Elizabeth, Corp, Nadia, Wright, Jenny, Jinks, Clare, Bishop, Simon, Doyle, Alison, Ong, Terence, Gittoes, Neil, Leonardi-Bee, Jo, Langley, Tessa, Horne, Robert, Sahota, Opinder
Format: Article
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.um.edu.my/38086/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.um.eprints.38086
record_format eprints
spelling my.um.eprints.380862023-01-16T07:30:38Z http://eprints.um.edu.my/38086/ Acceptability of bisphosphonates among patients, clinicians and managers: A systematic review and framework synthesis Paskins, Zoe Crawford-Manning, Fay Cottrell, Elizabeth Corp, Nadia Wright, Jenny Jinks, Clare Bishop, Simon Doyle, Alison Ong, Terence Gittoes, Neil Leonardi-Bee, Jo Langley, Tessa Horne, Robert Sahota, Opinder R Medicine (General) Objective To explore the acceptability of different bisphosphonate regimens for the treatment of osteoporosis among patients, clinicians and managers, payers and academics. Design A systematic review of primary qualitative studies. Seven databases were searched from inception to July 2019. Screening, data extraction and quality assessment of full-articles selected for inclusion were performed independently by two authors. A framework synthesis was applied to extracted data based on the theoretical framework of acceptability (TFA). The TFA includes seven domains relating to sense-making, emotions, opportunity costs, burden, perceived effectiveness, ethicality and self-efficacy. Confidence in synthesis findings was assessed. Setting Any developed country healthcare setting. Participants Patients, healthcare professionals, managers, payers and academics. Intervention Experiences and views of oral and intravenous bisphosphonates. Results Twenty-five studies were included, mostly describing perceptions of oral bisphosphonates. We identified, with high confidence, how patients and healthcare professionals make sense (coherence) of bisphosphonates by balancing perceptions of need against concerns, how uncertainty prevails about bisphosphonate perceived effectiveness and a number of individual and service factors that have potential to increase self-efficacy in recommending and adhering to bisphosphonates. We identified, with moderate confidence, that bisphosphonate taking induces concern, but has the potential to engender reassurance, and that both side effects and special instructions for taking oral bisphosphonates can result in treatment burden. Finally, we identified with low confidence that multimorbidity plays a role in people's perception of bisphosphonate acceptability. Conclusion By using the lens of acceptability, our findings demonstrate with high confidence that a theoretically informed, whole-system approach is necessary to both understand and improve adherence. Clinicians and patients need supporting to understand the need for bisphosphonates, and clinicians need to clarify to patients what constitutes bisphosphonate treatment success. Further research is needed to explore perspectives of male patients and those with multimorbidity receiving bisphosphonates, and patients receiving intravenous treatment. BMJ Publishing Group 2020 Article PeerReviewed Paskins, Zoe and Crawford-Manning, Fay and Cottrell, Elizabeth and Corp, Nadia and Wright, Jenny and Jinks, Clare and Bishop, Simon and Doyle, Alison and Ong, Terence and Gittoes, Neil and Leonardi-Bee, Jo and Langley, Tessa and Horne, Robert and Sahota, Opinder (2020) Acceptability of bisphosphonates among patients, clinicians and managers: A systematic review and framework synthesis. BMJ Open, 10 (11). ISSN 2044-6055, DOI https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040634 <https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040634>. 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040634
institution Universiti Malaya
building UM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaya
content_source UM Research Repository
url_provider http://eprints.um.edu.my/
topic R Medicine (General)
spellingShingle R Medicine (General)
Paskins, Zoe
Crawford-Manning, Fay
Cottrell, Elizabeth
Corp, Nadia
Wright, Jenny
Jinks, Clare
Bishop, Simon
Doyle, Alison
Ong, Terence
Gittoes, Neil
Leonardi-Bee, Jo
Langley, Tessa
Horne, Robert
Sahota, Opinder
Acceptability of bisphosphonates among patients, clinicians and managers: A systematic review and framework synthesis
description Objective To explore the acceptability of different bisphosphonate regimens for the treatment of osteoporosis among patients, clinicians and managers, payers and academics. Design A systematic review of primary qualitative studies. Seven databases were searched from inception to July 2019. Screening, data extraction and quality assessment of full-articles selected for inclusion were performed independently by two authors. A framework synthesis was applied to extracted data based on the theoretical framework of acceptability (TFA). The TFA includes seven domains relating to sense-making, emotions, opportunity costs, burden, perceived effectiveness, ethicality and self-efficacy. Confidence in synthesis findings was assessed. Setting Any developed country healthcare setting. Participants Patients, healthcare professionals, managers, payers and academics. Intervention Experiences and views of oral and intravenous bisphosphonates. Results Twenty-five studies were included, mostly describing perceptions of oral bisphosphonates. We identified, with high confidence, how patients and healthcare professionals make sense (coherence) of bisphosphonates by balancing perceptions of need against concerns, how uncertainty prevails about bisphosphonate perceived effectiveness and a number of individual and service factors that have potential to increase self-efficacy in recommending and adhering to bisphosphonates. We identified, with moderate confidence, that bisphosphonate taking induces concern, but has the potential to engender reassurance, and that both side effects and special instructions for taking oral bisphosphonates can result in treatment burden. Finally, we identified with low confidence that multimorbidity plays a role in people's perception of bisphosphonate acceptability. Conclusion By using the lens of acceptability, our findings demonstrate with high confidence that a theoretically informed, whole-system approach is necessary to both understand and improve adherence. Clinicians and patients need supporting to understand the need for bisphosphonates, and clinicians need to clarify to patients what constitutes bisphosphonate treatment success. Further research is needed to explore perspectives of male patients and those with multimorbidity receiving bisphosphonates, and patients receiving intravenous treatment.
format Article
author Paskins, Zoe
Crawford-Manning, Fay
Cottrell, Elizabeth
Corp, Nadia
Wright, Jenny
Jinks, Clare
Bishop, Simon
Doyle, Alison
Ong, Terence
Gittoes, Neil
Leonardi-Bee, Jo
Langley, Tessa
Horne, Robert
Sahota, Opinder
author_facet Paskins, Zoe
Crawford-Manning, Fay
Cottrell, Elizabeth
Corp, Nadia
Wright, Jenny
Jinks, Clare
Bishop, Simon
Doyle, Alison
Ong, Terence
Gittoes, Neil
Leonardi-Bee, Jo
Langley, Tessa
Horne, Robert
Sahota, Opinder
author_sort Paskins, Zoe
title Acceptability of bisphosphonates among patients, clinicians and managers: A systematic review and framework synthesis
title_short Acceptability of bisphosphonates among patients, clinicians and managers: A systematic review and framework synthesis
title_full Acceptability of bisphosphonates among patients, clinicians and managers: A systematic review and framework synthesis
title_fullStr Acceptability of bisphosphonates among patients, clinicians and managers: A systematic review and framework synthesis
title_full_unstemmed Acceptability of bisphosphonates among patients, clinicians and managers: A systematic review and framework synthesis
title_sort acceptability of bisphosphonates among patients, clinicians and managers: a systematic review and framework synthesis
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
publishDate 2020
url http://eprints.um.edu.my/38086/
_version_ 1755872670379933696
score 13.235362