Unlocked nailing vs. interlocking nailing for winquist type I and II femoral isthmus fractures. is there a difference?

Interlocking intramedullary nailing is suitable for comminuted femoral isthmus fractures, but for noncomminuted fractures its benefit over unlocked nailing is debatable. This study was undertaken to compare outcomes of interlocking nailing versus unlocked intramedullary nailing in such fractures. Ni...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yu, C.K., Wong, H.Y., Vivek, A.S., To, B.C.S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2008
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.um.edu.my/3597/1/unlocked_nailing_vs_interlocking_nailing.pdf
http://eprints.um.edu.my/3597/
http://www.morthoj.org/2008v2n1/unlocked_nailing_vs_interlocking_nailing.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.um.eprints.3597
record_format eprints
spelling my.um.eprints.35972014-10-28T05:06:13Z http://eprints.um.edu.my/3597/ Unlocked nailing vs. interlocking nailing for winquist type I and II femoral isthmus fractures. is there a difference? Yu, C.K. Wong, H.Y. Vivek, A.S. To, B.C.S. R Medicine Interlocking intramedullary nailing is suitable for comminuted femoral isthmus fractures, but for noncomminuted fractures its benefit over unlocked nailing is debatable. This study was undertaken to compare outcomes of interlocking nailing versus unlocked intramedullary nailing in such fractures. Ninety-three cases of noncomminuted femoral isthmus fractures (Winquist I and II) treated with interlocking nailing and unlocked nailing from 1 June 2004 to 1 June 2005 were reviewed; radiological and clinical union rates, bony alignment, complication and knee function were investigated. There was no statistical significant difference with regard to union rate, implant failure, infection and fracture alignment in both study groups. Open fixation with unlocked femoral nailing is technically less demanding and requires less operating time; additionally, there is no exposure to radiation and cost of the implant is cheaper. We therefore conclude that unlocked nailing is still useful for the management of non-comminuted isthmus fractures of the femur. 2008 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://eprints.um.edu.my/3597/1/unlocked_nailing_vs_interlocking_nailing.pdf Yu, C.K. and Wong, H.Y. and Vivek, A.S. and To, B.C.S. (2008) Unlocked nailing vs. interlocking nailing for winquist type I and II femoral isthmus fractures. is there a difference? Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal, 2 (1). pp. 23-27. http://www.morthoj.org/2008v2n1/unlocked_nailing_vs_interlocking_nailing.pdf 10.5704/MOJ.0804.005
institution Universiti Malaya
building UM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaya
content_source UM Research Repository
url_provider http://eprints.um.edu.my/
language English
topic R Medicine
spellingShingle R Medicine
Yu, C.K.
Wong, H.Y.
Vivek, A.S.
To, B.C.S.
Unlocked nailing vs. interlocking nailing for winquist type I and II femoral isthmus fractures. is there a difference?
description Interlocking intramedullary nailing is suitable for comminuted femoral isthmus fractures, but for noncomminuted fractures its benefit over unlocked nailing is debatable. This study was undertaken to compare outcomes of interlocking nailing versus unlocked intramedullary nailing in such fractures. Ninety-three cases of noncomminuted femoral isthmus fractures (Winquist I and II) treated with interlocking nailing and unlocked nailing from 1 June 2004 to 1 June 2005 were reviewed; radiological and clinical union rates, bony alignment, complication and knee function were investigated. There was no statistical significant difference with regard to union rate, implant failure, infection and fracture alignment in both study groups. Open fixation with unlocked femoral nailing is technically less demanding and requires less operating time; additionally, there is no exposure to radiation and cost of the implant is cheaper. We therefore conclude that unlocked nailing is still useful for the management of non-comminuted isthmus fractures of the femur.
format Article
author Yu, C.K.
Wong, H.Y.
Vivek, A.S.
To, B.C.S.
author_facet Yu, C.K.
Wong, H.Y.
Vivek, A.S.
To, B.C.S.
author_sort Yu, C.K.
title Unlocked nailing vs. interlocking nailing for winquist type I and II femoral isthmus fractures. is there a difference?
title_short Unlocked nailing vs. interlocking nailing for winquist type I and II femoral isthmus fractures. is there a difference?
title_full Unlocked nailing vs. interlocking nailing for winquist type I and II femoral isthmus fractures. is there a difference?
title_fullStr Unlocked nailing vs. interlocking nailing for winquist type I and II femoral isthmus fractures. is there a difference?
title_full_unstemmed Unlocked nailing vs. interlocking nailing for winquist type I and II femoral isthmus fractures. is there a difference?
title_sort unlocked nailing vs. interlocking nailing for winquist type i and ii femoral isthmus fractures. is there a difference?
publishDate 2008
url http://eprints.um.edu.my/3597/1/unlocked_nailing_vs_interlocking_nailing.pdf
http://eprints.um.edu.my/3597/
http://www.morthoj.org/2008v2n1/unlocked_nailing_vs_interlocking_nailing.pdf
_version_ 1643687155254427648
score 13.211869