Marital status and prostate cancer incidence: A pooled analysis of 12 case-control studies from the PRACTICAL consortium
While being in a committed relationship is associated with a better prostate cancer prognosis, little is known about how marital status relates to its incidence. Social support provided by marriage/relationship could promote a healthy lifestyle and an increased healthcare seeking behavior. We invest...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Published: |
Springer
2021
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://eprints.um.edu.my/34656/ |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| id |
my.um.eprints.34656 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
eprints |
| spelling |
my.um.eprints.346562022-09-15T08:15:35Z http://eprints.um.edu.my/34656/ Marital status and prostate cancer incidence: A pooled analysis of 12 case-control studies from the PRACTICAL consortium Salmon, Charlotte Song, Lixin Muir, Kenneth Pashayan, Nora Dunning, Alison M. Batra, Jyotsna Chambers, Suzanne Stanford, Janet L. Ostrander, Elaine A. Park, Jong Y. Lin, Hui-Yi Cussenot, Olivier Cancel-Tassin, Geraldine Menegaux, Florence Cordina-Duverger, Emilie Kogevinas, Manolis Llorca, Javier Kaneva, Radka Slavov, Chavdar Razack, Azad Lim, Jasmine Gago-Dominguez, Manuela Castelao, Jose Esteban Kote-Jarai, Zsofia Eeles, Rosalind A. Parent, Marie-Elise Collaborators, UKGPCS Pros, APCB BioResource Australian Consortium, PRACTICAL R Medicine RA Public aspects of medicine RC Internal medicine RC0254 Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology (including Cancer) While being in a committed relationship is associated with a better prostate cancer prognosis, little is known about how marital status relates to its incidence. Social support provided by marriage/relationship could promote a healthy lifestyle and an increased healthcare seeking behavior. We investigated the association between marital status and prostate cancer risk using data from the PRACTICAL Consortium. Pooled analyses were conducted combining 12 case-control studies based on histologically-confirmed incident prostate cancers and controls with information on marital status prior to diagnosis/interview. Marital status was categorized as married/partner, separated/divorced, single, or widowed. Tumours with Gleason scores >= 8 defined high-grade cancers, and low-grade otherwise. NCI-SEER's summary stages (local, regional, distant) indicated the extent of the cancer. Logistic regression was used to derive odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between marital status and prostate cancer risk, adjusting for potential confounders. Overall, 14,760 cases and 12,019 controls contributed to analyses. Compared to men who were married/with a partner, widowed men had an OR of 1.19 (95% CI 1.03-1.35) of prostate cancer, with little difference between low- and high-grade tumours. Risk estimates among widowers were 1.14 (95% CI 0.97-1.34) for local, 1.53 (95% CI 1.22-1.92) for regional, and 1.56 (95% CI 1.05-2.32) for distant stage tumours. Single men had elevated risks of high-grade cancers. Our findings highlight elevated risks of incident prostate cancer among widowers, more often characterized by tumours that had spread beyond the prostate at the time of diagnosis. Social support interventions and closer medical follow-up in this sub-population are warranted. Springer 2021-09 Article PeerReviewed Salmon, Charlotte and Song, Lixin and Muir, Kenneth and Pashayan, Nora and Dunning, Alison M. and Batra, Jyotsna and Chambers, Suzanne and Stanford, Janet L. and Ostrander, Elaine A. and Park, Jong Y. and Lin, Hui-Yi and Cussenot, Olivier and Cancel-Tassin, Geraldine and Menegaux, Florence and Cordina-Duverger, Emilie and Kogevinas, Manolis and Llorca, Javier and Kaneva, Radka and Slavov, Chavdar and Razack, Azad and Lim, Jasmine and Gago-Dominguez, Manuela and Castelao, Jose Esteban and Kote-Jarai, Zsofia and Eeles, Rosalind A. and Parent, Marie-Elise and Collaborators, UKGPCS and Pros, APCB BioResource Australian and Consortium, PRACTICAL (2021) Marital status and prostate cancer incidence: A pooled analysis of 12 case-control studies from the PRACTICAL consortium. European Journal of Epidemiology, 36 (9). pp. 913-925. ISSN 0393-2990, DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-021-00781-1 <https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-021-00781-1>. 10.1007/s10654-021-00781-1 |
| institution |
Universiti Malaya |
| building |
UM Library |
| collection |
Institutional Repository |
| continent |
Asia |
| country |
Malaysia |
| content_provider |
Universiti Malaya |
| content_source |
UM Research Repository |
| url_provider |
http://eprints.um.edu.my/ |
| topic |
R Medicine RA Public aspects of medicine RC Internal medicine RC0254 Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology (including Cancer) |
| spellingShingle |
R Medicine RA Public aspects of medicine RC Internal medicine RC0254 Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology (including Cancer) Salmon, Charlotte Song, Lixin Muir, Kenneth Pashayan, Nora Dunning, Alison M. Batra, Jyotsna Chambers, Suzanne Stanford, Janet L. Ostrander, Elaine A. Park, Jong Y. Lin, Hui-Yi Cussenot, Olivier Cancel-Tassin, Geraldine Menegaux, Florence Cordina-Duverger, Emilie Kogevinas, Manolis Llorca, Javier Kaneva, Radka Slavov, Chavdar Razack, Azad Lim, Jasmine Gago-Dominguez, Manuela Castelao, Jose Esteban Kote-Jarai, Zsofia Eeles, Rosalind A. Parent, Marie-Elise Collaborators, UKGPCS Pros, APCB BioResource Australian Consortium, PRACTICAL Marital status and prostate cancer incidence: A pooled analysis of 12 case-control studies from the PRACTICAL consortium |
| description |
While being in a committed relationship is associated with a better prostate cancer prognosis, little is known about how marital status relates to its incidence. Social support provided by marriage/relationship could promote a healthy lifestyle and an increased healthcare seeking behavior. We investigated the association between marital status and prostate cancer risk using data from the PRACTICAL Consortium. Pooled analyses were conducted combining 12 case-control studies based on histologically-confirmed incident prostate cancers and controls with information on marital status prior to diagnosis/interview. Marital status was categorized as married/partner, separated/divorced, single, or widowed. Tumours with Gleason scores >= 8 defined high-grade cancers, and low-grade otherwise. NCI-SEER's summary stages (local, regional, distant) indicated the extent of the cancer. Logistic regression was used to derive odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between marital status and prostate cancer risk, adjusting for potential confounders. Overall, 14,760 cases and 12,019 controls contributed to analyses. Compared to men who were married/with a partner, widowed men had an OR of 1.19 (95% CI 1.03-1.35) of prostate cancer, with little difference between low- and high-grade tumours. Risk estimates among widowers were 1.14 (95% CI 0.97-1.34) for local, 1.53 (95% CI 1.22-1.92) for regional, and 1.56 (95% CI 1.05-2.32) for distant stage tumours. Single men had elevated risks of high-grade cancers. Our findings highlight elevated risks of incident prostate cancer among widowers, more often characterized by tumours that had spread beyond the prostate at the time of diagnosis. Social support interventions and closer medical follow-up in this sub-population are warranted. |
| format |
Article |
| author |
Salmon, Charlotte Song, Lixin Muir, Kenneth Pashayan, Nora Dunning, Alison M. Batra, Jyotsna Chambers, Suzanne Stanford, Janet L. Ostrander, Elaine A. Park, Jong Y. Lin, Hui-Yi Cussenot, Olivier Cancel-Tassin, Geraldine Menegaux, Florence Cordina-Duverger, Emilie Kogevinas, Manolis Llorca, Javier Kaneva, Radka Slavov, Chavdar Razack, Azad Lim, Jasmine Gago-Dominguez, Manuela Castelao, Jose Esteban Kote-Jarai, Zsofia Eeles, Rosalind A. Parent, Marie-Elise Collaborators, UKGPCS Pros, APCB BioResource Australian Consortium, PRACTICAL |
| author_facet |
Salmon, Charlotte Song, Lixin Muir, Kenneth Pashayan, Nora Dunning, Alison M. Batra, Jyotsna Chambers, Suzanne Stanford, Janet L. Ostrander, Elaine A. Park, Jong Y. Lin, Hui-Yi Cussenot, Olivier Cancel-Tassin, Geraldine Menegaux, Florence Cordina-Duverger, Emilie Kogevinas, Manolis Llorca, Javier Kaneva, Radka Slavov, Chavdar Razack, Azad Lim, Jasmine Gago-Dominguez, Manuela Castelao, Jose Esteban Kote-Jarai, Zsofia Eeles, Rosalind A. Parent, Marie-Elise Collaborators, UKGPCS Pros, APCB BioResource Australian Consortium, PRACTICAL |
| author_sort |
Salmon, Charlotte |
| title |
Marital status and prostate cancer incidence: A pooled analysis of 12 case-control studies from the PRACTICAL consortium |
| title_short |
Marital status and prostate cancer incidence: A pooled analysis of 12 case-control studies from the PRACTICAL consortium |
| title_full |
Marital status and prostate cancer incidence: A pooled analysis of 12 case-control studies from the PRACTICAL consortium |
| title_fullStr |
Marital status and prostate cancer incidence: A pooled analysis of 12 case-control studies from the PRACTICAL consortium |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Marital status and prostate cancer incidence: A pooled analysis of 12 case-control studies from the PRACTICAL consortium |
| title_sort |
marital status and prostate cancer incidence: a pooled analysis of 12 case-control studies from the practical consortium |
| publisher |
Springer |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| url |
http://eprints.um.edu.my/34656/ |
| _version_ |
1744649192049999872 |
| score |
13.211869 |