Viscoelastic Properties of Contemporary Bulk-Fill Restoratives: A Dynamic-Mechanical Analysis
This study investigated the viscoelastic properties of contemporary bulk-fill restoratives in distilled water and artificial saliva using dynamic mechanical analysis. The materials evaluated included a conventional composite (Filtek Z350), two bulk-fill composites (Filtek Bulk-fill and Tetric N Cera...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Published: |
Academy of Operative Dentistry
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://eprints.um.edu.my/21067/ https://doi.org/10.2341/16-365-L |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
my.um.eprints.21067 |
---|---|
record_format |
eprints |
spelling |
my.um.eprints.210672019-04-24T08:09:38Z http://eprints.um.edu.my/21067/ Viscoelastic Properties of Contemporary Bulk-Fill Restoratives: A Dynamic-Mechanical Analysis Ong, Joshua E-Xin Yap, Adrian U-Jin Hong, Ja Young Eweis, Ahmed Hesham Yahya, Noor Azlin RK Dentistry This study investigated the viscoelastic properties of contemporary bulk-fill restoratives in distilled water and artificial saliva using dynamic mechanical analysis. The materials evaluated included a conventional composite (Filtek Z350), two bulk-fill composites (Filtek Bulk-fill and Tetric N Ceram), a bulk-fill giomer (Beautifil-Bulk Restorative), and two novel reinforced glass ionomer cements (Zirconomer [ZR] and Equia Forte [EQ]). The glass ionomer materials were also assessed with and without resin coating (Equia Forte Coat). Test specimens 12 × 2 × 2 mm of the various materials were fabricated using customized stainlesssteel molds. After light polymerization/initial set, the specimens were removed from the molds, finished, measured, and conditioned in distilled water or artificial saliva at 37°C for seven days. The materials (n=10) were then subjected to dynamic mechanical testing in flexure mode at 37°C and a frequency of 0.1 to 10 Hz. Storage modulus, loss modulus, and loss tangent data were subjected to normality testing and statistical analysis using one-way analysis of variance/Dunnett's test and t-Test at a significance level of p < 0.05. Mean storage modulus ranged from 3.16 ± 0.25 to 8.98 ± 0.44 GPa, while mean loss modulus ranged from 0.24 ± 0.03 to 0.65 ± 0.12 GPa for distilled water and artificial saliva. Values for loss tangent ranged from 45.7 ± 7.33 to 134.2 ± 12.36 (10 -3 ). Significant differences in storage/ loss modulus and loss tangent were observed between the various bulk-fill restoratives and two conditioning mediums. Storage modulus was significantly improved when EQ and ZR was not coated with resin. Academy of Operative Dentistry 2018 Article PeerReviewed Ong, Joshua E-Xin and Yap, Adrian U-Jin and Hong, Ja Young and Eweis, Ahmed Hesham and Yahya, Noor Azlin (2018) Viscoelastic Properties of Contemporary Bulk-Fill Restoratives: A Dynamic-Mechanical Analysis. Operative Dentistry, 43 (3). pp. 307-314. ISSN 0361-7734 https://doi.org/10.2341/16-365-L doi:10.2341/16-365-L |
institution |
Universiti Malaya |
building |
UM Library |
collection |
Institutional Repository |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Malaysia |
content_provider |
Universiti Malaya |
content_source |
UM Research Repository |
url_provider |
http://eprints.um.edu.my/ |
topic |
RK Dentistry |
spellingShingle |
RK Dentistry Ong, Joshua E-Xin Yap, Adrian U-Jin Hong, Ja Young Eweis, Ahmed Hesham Yahya, Noor Azlin Viscoelastic Properties of Contemporary Bulk-Fill Restoratives: A Dynamic-Mechanical Analysis |
description |
This study investigated the viscoelastic properties of contemporary bulk-fill restoratives in distilled water and artificial saliva using dynamic mechanical analysis. The materials evaluated included a conventional composite (Filtek Z350), two bulk-fill composites (Filtek Bulk-fill and Tetric N Ceram), a bulk-fill giomer (Beautifil-Bulk Restorative), and two novel reinforced glass ionomer cements (Zirconomer [ZR] and Equia Forte [EQ]). The glass ionomer materials were also assessed with and without resin coating (Equia Forte Coat). Test specimens 12 × 2 × 2 mm of the various materials were fabricated using customized stainlesssteel molds. After light polymerization/initial set, the specimens were removed from the molds, finished, measured, and conditioned in distilled water or artificial saliva at 37°C for seven days. The materials (n=10) were then subjected to dynamic mechanical testing in flexure mode at 37°C and a frequency of 0.1 to 10 Hz. Storage modulus, loss modulus, and loss tangent data were subjected to normality testing and statistical analysis using one-way analysis of variance/Dunnett's test and t-Test at a significance level of p < 0.05. Mean storage modulus ranged from 3.16 ± 0.25 to 8.98 ± 0.44 GPa, while mean loss modulus ranged from 0.24 ± 0.03 to 0.65 ± 0.12 GPa for distilled water and artificial saliva. Values for loss tangent ranged from 45.7 ± 7.33 to 134.2 ± 12.36 (10 -3 ). Significant differences in storage/ loss modulus and loss tangent were observed between the various bulk-fill restoratives and two conditioning mediums. Storage modulus was significantly improved when EQ and ZR was not coated with resin. |
format |
Article |
author |
Ong, Joshua E-Xin Yap, Adrian U-Jin Hong, Ja Young Eweis, Ahmed Hesham Yahya, Noor Azlin |
author_facet |
Ong, Joshua E-Xin Yap, Adrian U-Jin Hong, Ja Young Eweis, Ahmed Hesham Yahya, Noor Azlin |
author_sort |
Ong, Joshua E-Xin |
title |
Viscoelastic Properties of Contemporary Bulk-Fill Restoratives: A Dynamic-Mechanical Analysis |
title_short |
Viscoelastic Properties of Contemporary Bulk-Fill Restoratives: A Dynamic-Mechanical Analysis |
title_full |
Viscoelastic Properties of Contemporary Bulk-Fill Restoratives: A Dynamic-Mechanical Analysis |
title_fullStr |
Viscoelastic Properties of Contemporary Bulk-Fill Restoratives: A Dynamic-Mechanical Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Viscoelastic Properties of Contemporary Bulk-Fill Restoratives: A Dynamic-Mechanical Analysis |
title_sort |
viscoelastic properties of contemporary bulk-fill restoratives: a dynamic-mechanical analysis |
publisher |
Academy of Operative Dentistry |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
http://eprints.um.edu.my/21067/ https://doi.org/10.2341/16-365-L |
_version_ |
1643691457207336960 |
score |
13.211869 |