Cover Image

Randomised comparison of the LMA Supreme (TM) with the I-Gel (TM) in spontaneously breathing anaesthetised adult patients

We compared the performance of the LMA Supreme (TM) (SLMA) with the I-Gel (TM) during anaesthesia in spontaneously breathing adult patients Ninety patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II were studied in a prospective randomised controlled study Our primary outcome...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chew, E.F.F., Hashim, N.H.M., Wang, C.Y.
Format: Article
Published: Australian Soc Anaesthetists 2010
Subjects:
R Medicine
Online Access:http://eprints.um.edu.my/12050/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.um.eprints.12050
record_format eprints
spelling my.um.eprints.120502017-10-03T05:41:32Z http://eprints.um.edu.my/12050/ Randomised comparison of the LMA Supreme (TM) with the I-Gel (TM) in spontaneously breathing anaesthetised adult patients Chew, E.F.F. Hashim, N.H.M. Wang, C.Y. R Medicine We compared the performance of the LMA Supreme (TM) (SLMA) with the I-Gel (TM) during anaesthesia in spontaneously breathing adult patients Ninety patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II were studied in a prospective randomised controlled study Our primary outcome measure was oropharyngeal leak pressure We also compared the overall insertion success rate, ease of insertion, adequacy of ventilation and incidence of complications The mean (SD) oropharyngeal leak pressure for the SLMA was 25 6 (5 1) cmH(2)O, which was greater than for the I-Gel 20 7 (5 9) cmH(2)O (P=0 0001) The first attempt and overall insertion success rates were similar between the two groups (SLMA 978 and 978%, I-Gel 93 3 and 100%, P=0 132) The SI-MA was rated easier to Insert than the I-Gel (P=0 011), but the time taken for insertion (P=0 433) was similar The incidence of complications was low in both groups The grade of fibreoptic view was better with the I-Gel than the SLMA (P=0 001) We conclude that in adults with normal airways, the SLMA is easier to insert and provides a higher oropharyngeal leak pressure but fibreoptic views are better with the i-gel Australian Soc Anaesthetists 2010 Article PeerReviewed Chew, E.F.F. and Hashim, N.H.M. and Wang, C.Y. (2010) Randomised comparison of the LMA Supreme (TM) with the I-Gel (TM) in spontaneously breathing anaesthetised adult patients. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, 38 (6). pp. 1018-1022.
institution Universiti Malaya
building UM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaya
content_source UM Research Repository
url_provider http://eprints.um.edu.my/
topic R Medicine
spellingShingle R Medicine
Chew, E.F.F.
Hashim, N.H.M.
Wang, C.Y.
Randomised comparison of the LMA Supreme (TM) with the I-Gel (TM) in spontaneously breathing anaesthetised adult patients
description We compared the performance of the LMA Supreme (TM) (SLMA) with the I-Gel (TM) during anaesthesia in spontaneously breathing adult patients Ninety patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II were studied in a prospective randomised controlled study Our primary outcome measure was oropharyngeal leak pressure We also compared the overall insertion success rate, ease of insertion, adequacy of ventilation and incidence of complications The mean (SD) oropharyngeal leak pressure for the SLMA was 25 6 (5 1) cmH(2)O, which was greater than for the I-Gel 20 7 (5 9) cmH(2)O (P=0 0001) The first attempt and overall insertion success rates were similar between the two groups (SLMA 978 and 978%, I-Gel 93 3 and 100%, P=0 132) The SI-MA was rated easier to Insert than the I-Gel (P=0 011), but the time taken for insertion (P=0 433) was similar The incidence of complications was low in both groups The grade of fibreoptic view was better with the I-Gel than the SLMA (P=0 001) We conclude that in adults with normal airways, the SLMA is easier to insert and provides a higher oropharyngeal leak pressure but fibreoptic views are better with the i-gel
format Article
author Chew, E.F.F.
Hashim, N.H.M.
Wang, C.Y.
author_facet Chew, E.F.F.
Hashim, N.H.M.
Wang, C.Y.
author_sort Chew, E.F.F.
title Randomised comparison of the LMA Supreme (TM) with the I-Gel (TM) in spontaneously breathing anaesthetised adult patients
title_short Randomised comparison of the LMA Supreme (TM) with the I-Gel (TM) in spontaneously breathing anaesthetised adult patients
title_full Randomised comparison of the LMA Supreme (TM) with the I-Gel (TM) in spontaneously breathing anaesthetised adult patients
title_fullStr Randomised comparison of the LMA Supreme (TM) with the I-Gel (TM) in spontaneously breathing anaesthetised adult patients
title_full_unstemmed Randomised comparison of the LMA Supreme (TM) with the I-Gel (TM) in spontaneously breathing anaesthetised adult patients
title_sort randomised comparison of the lma supreme (tm) with the i-gel (tm) in spontaneously breathing anaesthetised adult patients
publisher Australian Soc Anaesthetists
publishDate 2010
url http://eprints.um.edu.my/12050/
_version_ 1643689207563026432
score 13.211869

Similar Items