Comparative investigation on the adhesion of hydroxyapatite coating on Ti–6Al–4V implant: A review paper
Hydroxyapatite (HA) has been used in clinical bone graft procedures for the past 25 years. Although a biocompatible material, its poor adhesion strength to substrate makes it unsuitable for major load-bearing devices. Investigations on various deposition techniques of HA coating on Ti–6Al–4V implant...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2014
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://eprints.um.edu.my/11810/ http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0143749613001681 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.09.030 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| id |
my.um.eprints.11810 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
eprints |
| spelling |
my.um.eprints.118102015-01-10T06:56:24Z http://eprints.um.edu.my/11810/ Comparative investigation on the adhesion of hydroxyapatite coating on Ti–6Al–4V implant: A review paper Mohseni, E. Zalnezhad, E. Bushroa, A.R. TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery Hydroxyapatite (HA) has been used in clinical bone graft procedures for the past 25 years. Although a biocompatible material, its poor adhesion strength to substrate makes it unsuitable for major load-bearing devices. Investigations on various deposition techniques of HA coating on Ti–6Al–4V implants have been made over the years, in particular to improve its adhesion strength to the metal alloy and its long-term reliability. This review comprehensively analyzes nine techniques mostly used for deposition of HA onto Ti–6Al–4V alloys. The techniques reviewed are Plasma sprayed deposition, Hot Isostatic Pressing, Thermal Spray, Dip coating, Pulsed Laser deposition (PLD), Electrophoretic deposition (EPD), Sol–Gel, Ion Beam Assisted deposition (IBAD), and Sputtering. The advantages and disadvantages of each method over other techniques are discussed. The adhesion strength and the factors affecting the adhesion of HA coating on Ti–6Al–4V implants are also compared. Elsevier 2014-01 Article PeerReviewed Mohseni, E. and Zalnezhad, E. and Bushroa, A.R. (2014) Comparative investigation on the adhesion of hydroxyapatite coating on Ti–6Al–4V implant: A review paper. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 48. pp. 238-257. ISSN 0143-7496 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0143749613001681 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.09.030 |
| institution |
Universiti Malaya |
| building |
UM Library |
| collection |
Institutional Repository |
| continent |
Asia |
| country |
Malaysia |
| content_provider |
Universiti Malaya |
| content_source |
UM Research Repository |
| url_provider |
http://eprints.um.edu.my/ |
| topic |
TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery |
| spellingShingle |
TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery Mohseni, E. Zalnezhad, E. Bushroa, A.R. Comparative investigation on the adhesion of hydroxyapatite coating on Ti–6Al–4V implant: A review paper |
| description |
Hydroxyapatite (HA) has been used in clinical bone graft procedures for the past 25 years. Although a biocompatible material, its poor adhesion strength to substrate makes it unsuitable for major load-bearing devices. Investigations on various deposition techniques of HA coating on Ti–6Al–4V implants have been made over the years, in particular to improve its adhesion strength to the metal alloy and its long-term reliability. This review comprehensively analyzes nine techniques mostly used for deposition of HA onto Ti–6Al–4V alloys. The techniques reviewed are Plasma sprayed deposition, Hot Isostatic Pressing, Thermal Spray, Dip coating, Pulsed Laser deposition (PLD), Electrophoretic deposition (EPD), Sol–Gel, Ion Beam Assisted deposition (IBAD), and Sputtering. The advantages and disadvantages of each method over other techniques are discussed. The adhesion strength and the factors affecting the adhesion of HA coating on Ti–6Al–4V implants are also compared. |
| format |
Article |
| author |
Mohseni, E. Zalnezhad, E. Bushroa, A.R. |
| author_facet |
Mohseni, E. Zalnezhad, E. Bushroa, A.R. |
| author_sort |
Mohseni, E. |
| title |
Comparative investigation on the adhesion of hydroxyapatite coating on Ti–6Al–4V implant: A review paper |
| title_short |
Comparative investigation on the adhesion of hydroxyapatite coating on Ti–6Al–4V implant: A review paper |
| title_full |
Comparative investigation on the adhesion of hydroxyapatite coating on Ti–6Al–4V implant: A review paper |
| title_fullStr |
Comparative investigation on the adhesion of hydroxyapatite coating on Ti–6Al–4V implant: A review paper |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Comparative investigation on the adhesion of hydroxyapatite coating on Ti–6Al–4V implant: A review paper |
| title_sort |
comparative investigation on the adhesion of hydroxyapatite coating on ti–6al–4v implant: a review paper |
| publisher |
Elsevier |
| publishDate |
2014 |
| url |
http://eprints.um.edu.my/11810/ http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0143749613001681 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.09.030 |
| _version_ |
1643689150525734912 |
| score |
13.211869 |