Evaluate Agisoft Metashape and Pix4D in 3D Model Reconstruction / Azulaidil Fahmi Aznam
This study compares the accuracy of 3D models generated using close-range photogrammetry with the accuracy generated by Agisoft Metashape and Pix4D software. In close-range photogrammetry, three-dimensional models are reconstructed by first gathering overlapping photos taken from various angles, the...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Student Project |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2023
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/87828/1/87828.pdf https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/87828/ |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | This study compares the accuracy of 3D models generated using close-range photogrammetry with the accuracy generated by Agisoft Metashape and Pix4D software. In close-range photogrammetry, three-dimensional models are reconstructed by first gathering overlapping photos taken from various angles, then applying an algorithm known as Structure from Motion (SfM). The renovation of the facade is the primary focus of the evaluation. Based on the comparison findings without ground control points, Agisoft Metashape can produce more accurate models than Pix4D. Another factor is the time required for processing, and Pix4D demonstrates superior performance. In conclusion, both software alternatives are suitable for close-range photogrammetry; however, Agisoft Metashape provides a greater level of accuracy, while Pix4D shines in providing a faster processing speed. The choice depends on specific project requirements between accuracy and processing speed. |
|---|