Cover Image

Finishing: traditional and modern technique / Munirah Ghazali

This study is to identify which are the best finishing techniques between traditional and modern techniques. In addition, the selection of finishing materials is also important to determine the suitability of using these two techniques. Finishing traditional technique is to use a brush, while the mo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ghazali, Munirah
Format: Student Project
Language:English
Published: 2012
Subjects:
Engineered wood. Fiberboard, particle board, etc.
Chemical processing of wood
Online Access:https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/76430/1/76430.PDF
https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/76430/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.uitm.ir.76430
record_format eprints
spelling my.uitm.ir.764302023-06-07T09:36:08Z https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/76430/ Finishing: traditional and modern technique / Munirah Ghazali Ghazali, Munirah Engineered wood. Fiberboard, particle board, etc. Chemical processing of wood This study is to identify which are the best finishing techniques between traditional and modern techniques. In addition, the selection of finishing materials is also important to determine the suitability of using these two techniques. Finishing traditional technique is to use a brush, while the modern technique using spray. Materials used in this study is the acid catalyst (AC), nitrocellulose (NC) and polyurethane (PU), which each have a lacquer as the most important material. Mixtures to produce these three materials are different to each other. AC and PU have a hardener material that serves to accelerate the drying process of material. While NC does not have the material and hardener is mixed with thinner. NC ratio of the mixture is 1:1. For the AC is the ratio was 10:4:1 (AC lacquer, AC Hardener, thinner). For the PU mixture ratio are 2:1:1 (PU lacquer, PU Hardener, thinner). For determine the viscosity of all materials the British cup is used. The time is between 12-16 seconds. Tests were also done to know which materials are resistant to friction (pencil test) and react with households materials such as sauce, soy sauce, oil, salt and detergent solution. Pencil tests were carried out using a soft pencil (grade B) to most hardest (grade H) begins with 9B, 8B, 7B, 6B, 5B, 4B, 3B, 2B, B, HB, F, H, 2H, 3H, 4H , 5h, 6H, 7h, 8h, and 9H. The results of the tests are that finishing spray technique is better than a brush technique. The PU is can withstand the pencils test and households test when it is compared with AC and NC. This is because the material is mixed with hardener. 2012 Student Project NonPeerReviewed text en https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/76430/1/76430.PDF Finishing: traditional and modern technique / Munirah Ghazali. (2012) [Student Project] <http://terminalib.uitm.edu.my/76430.pdf> (Unpublished)
institution Universiti Teknologi Mara
building Tun Abdul Razak Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Mara
content_source UiTM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://ir.uitm.edu.my/
language English
topic Engineered wood. Fiberboard, particle board, etc.
Chemical processing of wood
spellingShingle Engineered wood. Fiberboard, particle board, etc.
Chemical processing of wood
Ghazali, Munirah
Finishing: traditional and modern technique / Munirah Ghazali
description This study is to identify which are the best finishing techniques between traditional and modern techniques. In addition, the selection of finishing materials is also important to determine the suitability of using these two techniques. Finishing traditional technique is to use a brush, while the modern technique using spray. Materials used in this study is the acid catalyst (AC), nitrocellulose (NC) and polyurethane (PU), which each have a lacquer as the most important material. Mixtures to produce these three materials are different to each other. AC and PU have a hardener material that serves to accelerate the drying process of material. While NC does not have the material and hardener is mixed with thinner. NC ratio of the mixture is 1:1. For the AC is the ratio was 10:4:1 (AC lacquer, AC Hardener, thinner). For the PU mixture ratio are 2:1:1 (PU lacquer, PU Hardener, thinner). For determine the viscosity of all materials the British cup is used. The time is between 12-16 seconds. Tests were also done to know which materials are resistant to friction (pencil test) and react with households materials such as sauce, soy sauce, oil, salt and detergent solution. Pencil tests were carried out using a soft pencil (grade B) to most hardest (grade H) begins with 9B, 8B, 7B, 6B, 5B, 4B, 3B, 2B, B, HB, F, H, 2H, 3H, 4H , 5h, 6H, 7h, 8h, and 9H. The results of the tests are that finishing spray technique is better than a brush technique. The PU is can withstand the pencils test and households test when it is compared with AC and NC. This is because the material is mixed with hardener.
format Student Project
author Ghazali, Munirah
author_facet Ghazali, Munirah
author_sort Ghazali, Munirah
title Finishing: traditional and modern technique / Munirah Ghazali
title_short Finishing: traditional and modern technique / Munirah Ghazali
title_full Finishing: traditional and modern technique / Munirah Ghazali
title_fullStr Finishing: traditional and modern technique / Munirah Ghazali
title_full_unstemmed Finishing: traditional and modern technique / Munirah Ghazali
title_sort finishing: traditional and modern technique / munirah ghazali
publishDate 2012
url https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/76430/1/76430.PDF
https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/76430/
_version_ 1769846542544404480
score 13.244109

Similar Items