Governance in a globalized world: the limitations of corporate social responsibility / Krista Bywater

The Coca-Cola Corporation1 promotes itself as a responsible corporation while people from India and Colombia to the United States and Europe criticize the company’s business practices. Coke, like many other transnational corporations (TNCs), has adopted corporate social responsibility (CSR) policies...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bywater, Krista
Format: Conference or Workshop Item
Language:English
Published: 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/33921/1/33921.pdf
http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/33921/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.uitm.ir.33921
record_format eprints
spelling my.uitm.ir.339212020-09-10T01:23:38Z http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/33921/ Governance in a globalized world: the limitations of corporate social responsibility / Krista Bywater Bywater, Krista Corporate organization. Corporate governance Public relations. Industrial publicity Social responsibility of business. Social entrepreneurship The Coca-Cola Corporation1 promotes itself as a responsible corporation while people from India and Colombia to the United States and Europe criticize the company’s business practices. Coke, like many other transnational corporations (TNCs), has adopted corporate social responsibility (CSR) policies to protect its revenue and the reputation of its global goods and brand. The company continues to promote its CSR agenda to address the social opposition it has faced since re-entering India in 1993. Using the movement against Coke in India as a case study, this paper examines the problems with CSR and how firms can employ CSR policies to quell oppositional social movements. 2 Through initiatives such as corporate partnerships with development agencies and corporate sponsorship of non-governmental organizations (NGOs), companies, like Coca-Cola, blur the boundaries between markets and movements in order to minimize the effects of popular opposition to global goods. CSR is a discourse that helps companies “greenwash”3 (Greer and Bruno 1996) their images and appear more responsible without making meaningful changes to their business practices. Rather than being used to curtail the harmful effects of economic globalization and TNCs, CSR is typically employed to limit governmental regulation and justify increased foreign investment in the Global South (Blowfield 2005). As a result, CSR furthers the neoliberal agenda, which promotes economic globalization and foreign investment as the best means to achieve social and sustainable development. 2010 Conference or Workshop Item PeerReviewed text en http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/33921/1/33921.pdf Bywater, Krista (2010) Governance in a globalized world: the limitations of corporate social responsibility / Krista Bywater. In: ICOPS 2010 : International Conference on Public Polices & Social Sciences : E-Proceedings, 26 to 27 May 2010, SP Inn Hotel, Sungai Petani Kedah, Malaysia.
institution Universiti Teknologi Mara
building Tun Abdul Razak Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Mara
content_source UiTM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://ir.uitm.edu.my/
language English
topic Corporate organization. Corporate governance
Public relations. Industrial publicity
Social responsibility of business. Social entrepreneurship
spellingShingle Corporate organization. Corporate governance
Public relations. Industrial publicity
Social responsibility of business. Social entrepreneurship
Bywater, Krista
Governance in a globalized world: the limitations of corporate social responsibility / Krista Bywater
description The Coca-Cola Corporation1 promotes itself as a responsible corporation while people from India and Colombia to the United States and Europe criticize the company’s business practices. Coke, like many other transnational corporations (TNCs), has adopted corporate social responsibility (CSR) policies to protect its revenue and the reputation of its global goods and brand. The company continues to promote its CSR agenda to address the social opposition it has faced since re-entering India in 1993. Using the movement against Coke in India as a case study, this paper examines the problems with CSR and how firms can employ CSR policies to quell oppositional social movements. 2 Through initiatives such as corporate partnerships with development agencies and corporate sponsorship of non-governmental organizations (NGOs), companies, like Coca-Cola, blur the boundaries between markets and movements in order to minimize the effects of popular opposition to global goods. CSR is a discourse that helps companies “greenwash”3 (Greer and Bruno 1996) their images and appear more responsible without making meaningful changes to their business practices. Rather than being used to curtail the harmful effects of economic globalization and TNCs, CSR is typically employed to limit governmental regulation and justify increased foreign investment in the Global South (Blowfield 2005). As a result, CSR furthers the neoliberal agenda, which promotes economic globalization and foreign investment as the best means to achieve social and sustainable development.
format Conference or Workshop Item
author Bywater, Krista
author_facet Bywater, Krista
author_sort Bywater, Krista
title Governance in a globalized world: the limitations of corporate social responsibility / Krista Bywater
title_short Governance in a globalized world: the limitations of corporate social responsibility / Krista Bywater
title_full Governance in a globalized world: the limitations of corporate social responsibility / Krista Bywater
title_fullStr Governance in a globalized world: the limitations of corporate social responsibility / Krista Bywater
title_full_unstemmed Governance in a globalized world: the limitations of corporate social responsibility / Krista Bywater
title_sort governance in a globalized world: the limitations of corporate social responsibility / krista bywater
publishDate 2010
url http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/33921/1/33921.pdf
http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/33921/
_version_ 1685651124664664064
score 13.211869