Reviewon Malaysia’s GreenRE in comparison with Singapore’s GreenMark and UK’s BREEAM / Halmi Zainol ... [et al.]

The movement of green building was started after the Agenda21. International Council for Research and Innovation in Building and Construction highlighted the main challenges that sustainable development presents to the construction industry. The Agenda had an important role in the creation of gree...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Halmi, Zainol, Fadhilah, Che Aziz, Suharto, Teriman, Haryati, Mohd Isa, Muhamad Asri, Abdullah Kamar
Format: Conference or Workshop Item
Language:English
Published: 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/32753/1/32753.pdf
http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/32753/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.uitm.ir.32753
record_format eprints
spelling my.uitm.ir.327532020-07-27T05:57:15Z http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/32753/ Reviewon Malaysia’s GreenRE in comparison with Singapore’s GreenMark and UK’s BREEAM / Halmi Zainol ... [et al.] Halmi, Zainol Fadhilah, Che Aziz Suharto, Teriman Haryati, Mohd Isa Muhamad Asri, Abdullah Kamar Architectural engineering. Structural engineering of buildings Sustainable buildings. Sustainable construction The movement of green building was started after the Agenda21. International Council for Research and Innovation in Building and Construction highlighted the main challenges that sustainable development presents to the construction industry. The Agenda had an important role in the creation of green assessment tools in building industry. An international project coordinated from Canada namely GB Tool (Green Building Tool) was the first attempt to develop green rating tool. The awareness has emerged the implementation of various rating tools such as LEED, CASBEE, BREEAM and GreenMark developed by the United States of America, Japan, United Kingdom and Singapore respectively. Many rating systems can be developed in different regions that lookquite different, but share a common methodology and set of terms. In Malaysia, a new set of rating tool was developed by the Real Estate and Housing Developers Association (REHDA) known as GreenRE. This paper reviews the GreenRE and compare it with GreenMark and BREEAM. Since the latter were more established, this paper will study strengths, weaknesses, gaps and issue within the GreenRE. With the outcome of this study, it may help both the authority and industry-players to prepare a comprehensive assessment tool that suit to local practice. 2015 Conference or Workshop Item PeerReviewed text en http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/32753/1/32753.pdf Halmi, Zainol and Fadhilah, Che Aziz and Suharto, Teriman and Haryati, Mohd Isa and Muhamad Asri, Abdullah Kamar (2015) Reviewon Malaysia’s GreenRE in comparison with Singapore’s GreenMark and UK’s BREEAM / Halmi Zainol ... [et al.]. In: Proceedings of Postgraduate Conference on Global Green Issues (Go Green), 7-8 October 2015, Dewan Kuliah Al-Khawarizmi Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Perak.
institution Universiti Teknologi Mara
building Tun Abdul Razak Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Mara
content_source UiTM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://ir.uitm.edu.my/
language English
topic Architectural engineering. Structural engineering of buildings
Sustainable buildings. Sustainable construction
spellingShingle Architectural engineering. Structural engineering of buildings
Sustainable buildings. Sustainable construction
Halmi, Zainol
Fadhilah, Che Aziz
Suharto, Teriman
Haryati, Mohd Isa
Muhamad Asri, Abdullah Kamar
Reviewon Malaysia’s GreenRE in comparison with Singapore’s GreenMark and UK’s BREEAM / Halmi Zainol ... [et al.]
description The movement of green building was started after the Agenda21. International Council for Research and Innovation in Building and Construction highlighted the main challenges that sustainable development presents to the construction industry. The Agenda had an important role in the creation of green assessment tools in building industry. An international project coordinated from Canada namely GB Tool (Green Building Tool) was the first attempt to develop green rating tool. The awareness has emerged the implementation of various rating tools such as LEED, CASBEE, BREEAM and GreenMark developed by the United States of America, Japan, United Kingdom and Singapore respectively. Many rating systems can be developed in different regions that lookquite different, but share a common methodology and set of terms. In Malaysia, a new set of rating tool was developed by the Real Estate and Housing Developers Association (REHDA) known as GreenRE. This paper reviews the GreenRE and compare it with GreenMark and BREEAM. Since the latter were more established, this paper will study strengths, weaknesses, gaps and issue within the GreenRE. With the outcome of this study, it may help both the authority and industry-players to prepare a comprehensive assessment tool that suit to local practice.
format Conference or Workshop Item
author Halmi, Zainol
Fadhilah, Che Aziz
Suharto, Teriman
Haryati, Mohd Isa
Muhamad Asri, Abdullah Kamar
author_facet Halmi, Zainol
Fadhilah, Che Aziz
Suharto, Teriman
Haryati, Mohd Isa
Muhamad Asri, Abdullah Kamar
author_sort Halmi, Zainol
title Reviewon Malaysia’s GreenRE in comparison with Singapore’s GreenMark and UK’s BREEAM / Halmi Zainol ... [et al.]
title_short Reviewon Malaysia’s GreenRE in comparison with Singapore’s GreenMark and UK’s BREEAM / Halmi Zainol ... [et al.]
title_full Reviewon Malaysia’s GreenRE in comparison with Singapore’s GreenMark and UK’s BREEAM / Halmi Zainol ... [et al.]
title_fullStr Reviewon Malaysia’s GreenRE in comparison with Singapore’s GreenMark and UK’s BREEAM / Halmi Zainol ... [et al.]
title_full_unstemmed Reviewon Malaysia’s GreenRE in comparison with Singapore’s GreenMark and UK’s BREEAM / Halmi Zainol ... [et al.]
title_sort reviewon malaysia’s greenre in comparison with singapore’s greenmark and uk’s breeam / halmi zainol ... [et al.]
publishDate 2015
url http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/32753/1/32753.pdf
http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/32753/
_version_ 1685650967730585600
score 13.211869