Cover Image

Judicial Appointments Commission: a comparison between the Judicial Appointments Commission in Malaysia and The Judicial Appointments Commission in United Kingdom / Ahmad Danial Mohd Azlan, Luqman Mazlan and Mohd Irzan Iswatt Mohd Noor

This project paper has been conducted in relation of the Judicial Appointments Commission. For the purpose of our research, we have compared the two Acts which are the Judicial Appointments Act in Malaysia and also the Constitutional Reform Act in United Kingdom. This is because both models have dif...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohd Azlan, Ahmad Danial, Mazlan, Luqman, Mohd Noor, Mohd Irzan Iswatt
Format: Student Project
Language:English
Published: 2011
Subjects:
Civil law
Online Access:http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/31929/1/31929.pdf
http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/31929/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.uitm.ir.31929
record_format eprints
spelling my.uitm.ir.319292020-10-13T04:04:16Z http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/31929/ Judicial Appointments Commission: a comparison between the Judicial Appointments Commission in Malaysia and The Judicial Appointments Commission in United Kingdom / Ahmad Danial Mohd Azlan, Luqman Mazlan and Mohd Irzan Iswatt Mohd Noor Mohd Azlan, Ahmad Danial Mazlan, Luqman Mohd Noor, Mohd Irzan Iswatt Civil law This project paper has been conducted in relation of the Judicial Appointments Commission. For the purpose of our research, we have compared the two Acts which are the Judicial Appointments Act in Malaysia and also the Constitutional Reform Act in United Kingdom. This is because both models have different structures and functions as to having the exclusive rights towards judicial independence. In upholding the independence of Judiciary, we have done a comparison between these two countries, Malaysia and United Kingdom. This is important for the purpose of our paper project, in order to review the loopholes of structures and functions of Judicial Appointments Commission in Malaysia. This is because the setting up of this body defeats the purpose of having exclusive rights of judicial independence as there is still an infringement of power by the Executive solely by the Prime Minister. Furthermore, in order to provide a better form and structures of Judicial Appointments Commission, this project paper will provide a reasonable suggestions and rational recommendations on the loopholes discovered from the comparative study between the two bodies. 2011 Student Project NonPeerReviewed text en http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/31929/1/31929.pdf Mohd Azlan, Ahmad Danial and Mazlan, Luqman and Mohd Noor, Mohd Irzan Iswatt (2011) Judicial Appointments Commission: a comparison between the Judicial Appointments Commission in Malaysia and The Judicial Appointments Commission in United Kingdom / Ahmad Danial Mohd Azlan, Luqman Mazlan and Mohd Irzan Iswatt Mohd Noor. [Student Project] (Unpublished)
institution Universiti Teknologi Mara
building Tun Abdul Razak Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Mara
content_source UiTM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://ir.uitm.edu.my/
language English
topic Civil law
spellingShingle Civil law
Mohd Azlan, Ahmad Danial
Mazlan, Luqman
Mohd Noor, Mohd Irzan Iswatt
Judicial Appointments Commission: a comparison between the Judicial Appointments Commission in Malaysia and The Judicial Appointments Commission in United Kingdom / Ahmad Danial Mohd Azlan, Luqman Mazlan and Mohd Irzan Iswatt Mohd Noor
description This project paper has been conducted in relation of the Judicial Appointments Commission. For the purpose of our research, we have compared the two Acts which are the Judicial Appointments Act in Malaysia and also the Constitutional Reform Act in United Kingdom. This is because both models have different structures and functions as to having the exclusive rights towards judicial independence. In upholding the independence of Judiciary, we have done a comparison between these two countries, Malaysia and United Kingdom. This is important for the purpose of our paper project, in order to review the loopholes of structures and functions of Judicial Appointments Commission in Malaysia. This is because the setting up of this body defeats the purpose of having exclusive rights of judicial independence as there is still an infringement of power by the Executive solely by the Prime Minister. Furthermore, in order to provide a better form and structures of Judicial Appointments Commission, this project paper will provide a reasonable suggestions and rational recommendations on the loopholes discovered from the comparative study between the two bodies.
format Student Project
author Mohd Azlan, Ahmad Danial
Mazlan, Luqman
Mohd Noor, Mohd Irzan Iswatt
author_facet Mohd Azlan, Ahmad Danial
Mazlan, Luqman
Mohd Noor, Mohd Irzan Iswatt
author_sort Mohd Azlan, Ahmad Danial
title Judicial Appointments Commission: a comparison between the Judicial Appointments Commission in Malaysia and The Judicial Appointments Commission in United Kingdom / Ahmad Danial Mohd Azlan, Luqman Mazlan and Mohd Irzan Iswatt Mohd Noor
title_short Judicial Appointments Commission: a comparison between the Judicial Appointments Commission in Malaysia and The Judicial Appointments Commission in United Kingdom / Ahmad Danial Mohd Azlan, Luqman Mazlan and Mohd Irzan Iswatt Mohd Noor
title_full Judicial Appointments Commission: a comparison between the Judicial Appointments Commission in Malaysia and The Judicial Appointments Commission in United Kingdom / Ahmad Danial Mohd Azlan, Luqman Mazlan and Mohd Irzan Iswatt Mohd Noor
title_fullStr Judicial Appointments Commission: a comparison between the Judicial Appointments Commission in Malaysia and The Judicial Appointments Commission in United Kingdom / Ahmad Danial Mohd Azlan, Luqman Mazlan and Mohd Irzan Iswatt Mohd Noor
title_full_unstemmed Judicial Appointments Commission: a comparison between the Judicial Appointments Commission in Malaysia and The Judicial Appointments Commission in United Kingdom / Ahmad Danial Mohd Azlan, Luqman Mazlan and Mohd Irzan Iswatt Mohd Noor
title_sort judicial appointments commission: a comparison between the judicial appointments commission in malaysia and the judicial appointments commission in united kingdom / ahmad danial mohd azlan, luqman mazlan and mohd irzan iswatt mohd noor
publishDate 2011
url http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/31929/1/31929.pdf
http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/31929/
_version_ 1685650854901710848
score 13.211869

Similar Items