The comparison of capacity and energy usage of two paddy planting method in IADA Barat Laut, Selangor / Mohammad Azrul Haziq Zulkifli

In this 21th century, paddy productions continue to improve its productivity by using technology. The technology use in paddy production is using mechanisation instead of using hand or animal assisted. In Malaysia, there are two types of paddy planting method that widely used by farmers; transplante...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Zulkifli, Mohammad Azrul Haziq
Format: Student Project
Language:English
Published: Faculty of Plantation and Agrotechnology 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/24018/1/24018.pdf
http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/24018/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.uitm.ir.24018
record_format eprints
spelling my.uitm.ir.240182020-08-06T03:18:24Z http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/24018/ The comparison of capacity and energy usage of two paddy planting method in IADA Barat Laut, Selangor / Mohammad Azrul Haziq Zulkifli Zulkifli, Mohammad Azrul Haziq Environmental conditions. Environmental quality. Environmental indicators. Environmental degradation S Agriculture (General) Farm machinery and farm engineering In this 21th century, paddy productions continue to improve its productivity by using technology. The technology use in paddy production is using mechanisation instead of using hand or animal assisted. In Malaysia, there are two types of paddy planting method that widely used by farmers; transplanter and direct-seeding. In IADA Barat Laut , Selangor from the survey that have been done, the farmers there unfortunately using these two methods without knowing the field capacity ,energy usage and the total cost involved. The parameters collected to fulfil the objectives are time taken (ha/hr), speed (km/hr), width of implement (m), number of run and fuel consumption. The result obtained shows that the transplanter gave higher field capacity (0.78 ha/hr) than direct-seeding (0.30 ha/hr). In field efficiency, transplanter gave higher percentage (%) where transplanter is (62%) and (59%) for direct-seeding. Next, the total energy used in transplanter also lowers than direct-seeding method which is (3094.54 MJ ha-1) and (3633.70 MJ ha-1). However, the costing for direct-seeding method is cheaper than using transplanter where (RM495) and (RM1470). As a conclusion, transplanter is more effective in time and can cover larger area even though the cost is higher than direct-seeding method. Faculty of Plantation and Agrotechnology 2017 Student Project NonPeerReviewed text en http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/24018/1/24018.pdf Zulkifli, Mohammad Azrul Haziq (2017) The comparison of capacity and energy usage of two paddy planting method in IADA Barat Laut, Selangor / Mohammad Azrul Haziq Zulkifli. [Student Project] (Unpublished)
institution Universiti Teknologi Mara
building Tun Abdul Razak Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Mara
content_source UiTM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://ir.uitm.edu.my/
language English
topic Environmental conditions. Environmental quality. Environmental indicators. Environmental degradation
S Agriculture (General)
Farm machinery and farm engineering
spellingShingle Environmental conditions. Environmental quality. Environmental indicators. Environmental degradation
S Agriculture (General)
Farm machinery and farm engineering
Zulkifli, Mohammad Azrul Haziq
The comparison of capacity and energy usage of two paddy planting method in IADA Barat Laut, Selangor / Mohammad Azrul Haziq Zulkifli
description In this 21th century, paddy productions continue to improve its productivity by using technology. The technology use in paddy production is using mechanisation instead of using hand or animal assisted. In Malaysia, there are two types of paddy planting method that widely used by farmers; transplanter and direct-seeding. In IADA Barat Laut , Selangor from the survey that have been done, the farmers there unfortunately using these two methods without knowing the field capacity ,energy usage and the total cost involved. The parameters collected to fulfil the objectives are time taken (ha/hr), speed (km/hr), width of implement (m), number of run and fuel consumption. The result obtained shows that the transplanter gave higher field capacity (0.78 ha/hr) than direct-seeding (0.30 ha/hr). In field efficiency, transplanter gave higher percentage (%) where transplanter is (62%) and (59%) for direct-seeding. Next, the total energy used in transplanter also lowers than direct-seeding method which is (3094.54 MJ ha-1) and (3633.70 MJ ha-1). However, the costing for direct-seeding method is cheaper than using transplanter where (RM495) and (RM1470). As a conclusion, transplanter is more effective in time and can cover larger area even though the cost is higher than direct-seeding method.
format Student Project
author Zulkifli, Mohammad Azrul Haziq
author_facet Zulkifli, Mohammad Azrul Haziq
author_sort Zulkifli, Mohammad Azrul Haziq
title The comparison of capacity and energy usage of two paddy planting method in IADA Barat Laut, Selangor / Mohammad Azrul Haziq Zulkifli
title_short The comparison of capacity and energy usage of two paddy planting method in IADA Barat Laut, Selangor / Mohammad Azrul Haziq Zulkifli
title_full The comparison of capacity and energy usage of two paddy planting method in IADA Barat Laut, Selangor / Mohammad Azrul Haziq Zulkifli
title_fullStr The comparison of capacity and energy usage of two paddy planting method in IADA Barat Laut, Selangor / Mohammad Azrul Haziq Zulkifli
title_full_unstemmed The comparison of capacity and energy usage of two paddy planting method in IADA Barat Laut, Selangor / Mohammad Azrul Haziq Zulkifli
title_sort comparison of capacity and energy usage of two paddy planting method in iada barat laut, selangor / mohammad azrul haziq zulkifli
publisher Faculty of Plantation and Agrotechnology
publishDate 2017
url http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/24018/1/24018.pdf
http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/24018/
_version_ 1685649804599754752
score 13.211869