Trade-off theory vs Pecking order theory: evidence from islamic and conventional banks in Malaysia / Muhamad Syahir Saari
The purpose of the study is to determine which theory provides the best explanation toward capital structures of the banking industry in Malaysia. The study is divided into two parts which is Islamic banks and Conventional banks. The establishment of three objectives is to test whether independent v...
Saved in:
Main Author: | Saari, Muhamad Syahir |
---|---|
Format: | Student Project |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/108461/1/108461.pdf https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/108461/ |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Validity of pecking order and trade-off theories in explaining capital structure of listed firms in South Africa
by: Tunde, Matemilola Bolaji
Published: (2012) -
A Test of Static Trade-Off Theory and Pecking Order Theory on Malaysia Firms' Growth Opportunities and Financial Decision Policy
by: Goh, Siew Ping
Published: (2011) -
Pecking order theory of capital structure: empirical evidence from dynamic panel data
by: Tunde, Matemilola Bolaji, et al.
Published: (2011) -
A delusive paradigm : pecking order versus trade-off model / Subadron Salbado
by: Salbado, Subadron
Published: (2015) -
Debt and cash flow relationship in pecking order theory of corporate financing: dynamic panel evidence
by: Matemilola, B. T., et al.
Published: (2014)