Cover Image

Analyses of the methodological differences between Muhaddithun and Usuliyyun in Hadith criticism

This paper focuses on the difference in methodology between Muhaddithun and Usuliyyun on Hadith discourse. Hadith is commonly referred to as words, actions, and tacit approval of the prophet Muhammad ?. A muhaddith means someone who is highly knowledgeable and possesses mastery in the field of Hadit...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ramle, Muhamad Rozaimi, Asni, Fathullah, Mohamad, Mohd Yusof
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: HRMARS 2022
Subjects:
BP1 Islam
Online Access:http://irep.iium.edu.my/98311/7/98311_Analyses%20of%20the%20methodological.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/98311/
http://hrmars.com/index.php/pages/detail/IJARBSS
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.iium.irep.98311
record_format dspace
spelling my.iium.irep.983112022-06-13T07:10:46Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/98311/ Analyses of the methodological differences between Muhaddithun and Usuliyyun in Hadith criticism Ramle, Muhamad Rozaimi Asni, Fathullah Mohamad, Mohd Yusof BP1 Islam This paper focuses on the difference in methodology between Muhaddithun and Usuliyyun on Hadith discourse. Hadith is commonly referred to as words, actions, and tacit approval of the prophet Muhammad ?. A muhaddith means someone who is highly knowledgeable and possesses mastery in the field of Hadith. An Usuliy on the other hand refers to scholars who have expertise on matters related to Usul al-Fiqh, namely the principle of Islamic jurisprudence. Differences of opinions between Muhaddithun and Usuliyyun are thought to have significant methodological variances in hadith criticism. Few modern scholars claimed the differences were absent since the Usuliyyun merely followed the Muhaddithun in matters of critics of Hadith. This opinion is nevertheless contrasted by other group scholars. Therefore, this study examined both paradigms on the methodological issues over the criticism of Hadith and analyzed their various views. For this purpose, analytical and critical methodologies were used in addition to the descriptive methodology. Classic books of sciences of Hadith such as Fath al-Mughith and the Muqaddimah ‘Ulum al-Hadith were analyzed for this purpose. As for Usul al-Fiqh, works like Raudat al-Na?ir and Nihayat al-Sul were scrutinized accordingly. This study demonstrated differences indeed existed between these two factions in matters related to criticism of hadith, both theoretically and practically. HRMARS 2022-05-30 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/98311/7/98311_Analyses%20of%20the%20methodological.pdf Ramle, Muhamad Rozaimi and Asni, Fathullah and Mohamad, Mohd Yusof (2022) Analyses of the methodological differences between Muhaddithun and Usuliyyun in Hadith criticism. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12 (6). pp. 620-629. ISSN 2222-6990 http://hrmars.com/index.php/pages/detail/IJARBSS 10.6007/IJARBSS/v12-i6/13324
institution Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Malaysia
building IIUM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider International Islamic University Malaysia
content_source IIUM Repository (IREP)
url_provider http://irep.iium.edu.my/
language English
topic BP1 Islam
spellingShingle BP1 Islam
Ramle, Muhamad Rozaimi
Asni, Fathullah
Mohamad, Mohd Yusof
Analyses of the methodological differences between Muhaddithun and Usuliyyun in Hadith criticism
description This paper focuses on the difference in methodology between Muhaddithun and Usuliyyun on Hadith discourse. Hadith is commonly referred to as words, actions, and tacit approval of the prophet Muhammad ?. A muhaddith means someone who is highly knowledgeable and possesses mastery in the field of Hadith. An Usuliy on the other hand refers to scholars who have expertise on matters related to Usul al-Fiqh, namely the principle of Islamic jurisprudence. Differences of opinions between Muhaddithun and Usuliyyun are thought to have significant methodological variances in hadith criticism. Few modern scholars claimed the differences were absent since the Usuliyyun merely followed the Muhaddithun in matters of critics of Hadith. This opinion is nevertheless contrasted by other group scholars. Therefore, this study examined both paradigms on the methodological issues over the criticism of Hadith and analyzed their various views. For this purpose, analytical and critical methodologies were used in addition to the descriptive methodology. Classic books of sciences of Hadith such as Fath al-Mughith and the Muqaddimah ‘Ulum al-Hadith were analyzed for this purpose. As for Usul al-Fiqh, works like Raudat al-Na?ir and Nihayat al-Sul were scrutinized accordingly. This study demonstrated differences indeed existed between these two factions in matters related to criticism of hadith, both theoretically and practically.
format Article
author Ramle, Muhamad Rozaimi
Asni, Fathullah
Mohamad, Mohd Yusof
author_facet Ramle, Muhamad Rozaimi
Asni, Fathullah
Mohamad, Mohd Yusof
author_sort Ramle, Muhamad Rozaimi
title Analyses of the methodological differences between Muhaddithun and Usuliyyun in Hadith criticism
title_short Analyses of the methodological differences between Muhaddithun and Usuliyyun in Hadith criticism
title_full Analyses of the methodological differences between Muhaddithun and Usuliyyun in Hadith criticism
title_fullStr Analyses of the methodological differences between Muhaddithun and Usuliyyun in Hadith criticism
title_full_unstemmed Analyses of the methodological differences between Muhaddithun and Usuliyyun in Hadith criticism
title_sort analyses of the methodological differences between muhaddithun and usuliyyun in hadith criticism
publisher HRMARS
publishDate 2022
url http://irep.iium.edu.my/98311/7/98311_Analyses%20of%20the%20methodological.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/98311/
http://hrmars.com/index.php/pages/detail/IJARBSS
_version_ 1735569855737757696
score 13.211869

Similar Items