The relevancy and admissibility of evidence obtained through unlawful means: a comparative legal appraisal
The rules relating to the admissibility or inadmissibility of illegally or improperly obtained evidence is a matter of court's discretion. The question of whether this kind of evidence ought to be rejected because it was obtained illegally, that is, by a crime, a tort or a breach of official po...
Saved in:
Main Author: | Mohamad Yunus, Mohamad Ismail |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institut Kefahaman Islam Malaysia (IKIM)
2004
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://irep.iium.edu.my/8363/1/2004_-_The_relevancy_and_admissibility_of_evidence_obtained_through_unlawful_means-_a_comparative_legal_appraisal.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/8363/ http://www.ikim.gov.my/v5/index.php?lg=2&opt=com_book&grp=2&sec=8&key=9&mode=detail |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Relevancy and admissibility of child testimony: a comparative appraisal
by: Mohamad Yunus, Mohamad Ismail
Published: (2017) -
The status of evidence obtained unlawfully: a comparative appraisal of the laws in some selected Common law jurisdictions and Islamic law perspective
by: Shair Mohamed, Mohd Akram, et al.
Published: (2016) -
Treatment of wealth acquired by unlawful means: an Islamic legal perspective
by: Ibrahim, Badruddin, et al.
Published: (2019) -
The admissibility of unfair or illegally obtained evidence: a brief overview
by: Shair Mohamad, Mohd Akram, et al.
Published: (2011) -
Treatment of unlawful wealth which acquired by unlawful means from Islamic legal perspective
by: Ibrahim, Badruddin, et al.
Published: (2018)