The reception of the law relating to Res Gestae in Malaysia

The LAW of EVIDENCE is termed as the eyes of the law. It is one essential legal tools that govern the aspect of proof that will determine whether certain kind of evidence tendered before the court is relevant, admissible otherwise. This is very important in order to have a fair trial and to establis...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: Mohamad Yunus, Mohamad Ismail
Format: Book
Language:English
Published: Research Centre, International Islamic University Malaysia 2006
Subjects:
Online Access:http://irep.iium.edu.my/7968/1/2006_-_The_reception_of_the_law_relating_to_Res_Gestae_in_Malaysia.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/7968/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.iium.irep.7968
record_format dspace
spelling my.iium.irep.79682014-10-21T01:23:10Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/7968/ The reception of the law relating to Res Gestae in Malaysia K Law (General) KPG Malaysia The LAW of EVIDENCE is termed as the eyes of the law. It is one essential legal tools that govern the aspect of proof that will determine whether certain kind of evidence tendered before the court is relevant, admissible otherwise. This is very important in order to have a fair trial and to establish justice. This research will analyses whether the doctrine of Res Gestae (a common law legal concept) which literally means "the thing done", a transaction or essential circumstances surrounding facts which are so closely connected to the fact in issue. Legally, it means circumstances, which are spontaneous and contemporaneous, or unplanned incidents of a particular litigated act, is relevant and thus admissible fact under the Malaysian Law. In most cases appear before the court of law, there is a fact story behind each of such cases, and each fact story contains several acts, omissions and statements. When evidence is given of such acts omissions and statements, although they are not in issue, but are capable of throwing some light upon the nature of transactions, revealing its true quality and character which may constitute a relevant fact. Such acts omissions and statements are regarded, as part of the same transaction and the bottom line issue here is that whether such facts are allowed to be proved? If yes, to what extent does the admissibility apply? If no, what is the different approach taken by the Malaysian Courts compared to the Common Law principle? Research Centre, International Islamic University Malaysia Mohamad Yunus, Mohamad Ismail 2006 Book REM application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/7968/1/2006_-_The_reception_of_the_law_relating_to_Res_Gestae_in_Malaysia.pdf Mohamad Yunus, Mohamad Ismail, ed. (2006) The reception of the law relating to Res Gestae in Malaysia. Research Centre, International Islamic University Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur. ISBN 983-2957-74-5
institution Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Malaysia
building IIUM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider International Islamic University Malaysia
content_source IIUM Repository (IREP)
url_provider http://irep.iium.edu.my/
language English
topic K Law (General)
KPG Malaysia
spellingShingle K Law (General)
KPG Malaysia
The reception of the law relating to Res Gestae in Malaysia
description The LAW of EVIDENCE is termed as the eyes of the law. It is one essential legal tools that govern the aspect of proof that will determine whether certain kind of evidence tendered before the court is relevant, admissible otherwise. This is very important in order to have a fair trial and to establish justice. This research will analyses whether the doctrine of Res Gestae (a common law legal concept) which literally means "the thing done", a transaction or essential circumstances surrounding facts which are so closely connected to the fact in issue. Legally, it means circumstances, which are spontaneous and contemporaneous, or unplanned incidents of a particular litigated act, is relevant and thus admissible fact under the Malaysian Law. In most cases appear before the court of law, there is a fact story behind each of such cases, and each fact story contains several acts, omissions and statements. When evidence is given of such acts omissions and statements, although they are not in issue, but are capable of throwing some light upon the nature of transactions, revealing its true quality and character which may constitute a relevant fact. Such acts omissions and statements are regarded, as part of the same transaction and the bottom line issue here is that whether such facts are allowed to be proved? If yes, to what extent does the admissibility apply? If no, what is the different approach taken by the Malaysian Courts compared to the Common Law principle?
author2 Mohamad Yunus, Mohamad Ismail
author_facet Mohamad Yunus, Mohamad Ismail
format Book
title The reception of the law relating to Res Gestae in Malaysia
title_short The reception of the law relating to Res Gestae in Malaysia
title_full The reception of the law relating to Res Gestae in Malaysia
title_fullStr The reception of the law relating to Res Gestae in Malaysia
title_full_unstemmed The reception of the law relating to Res Gestae in Malaysia
title_sort reception of the law relating to res gestae in malaysia
publisher Research Centre, International Islamic University Malaysia
publishDate 2006
url http://irep.iium.edu.my/7968/1/2006_-_The_reception_of_the_law_relating_to_Res_Gestae_in_Malaysia.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/7968/
_version_ 1643606041137512448
score 13.211869