Halal governance in Indonesia: theory, current practices, and related issues
Considering Indonesia’s target to lead halal industry worldwide, the discussion upon the current practices of halal governance in the country is critical to get into a comprehensive insight. Several major drawbacks within the previous studies on this topic is found along the followings. There has...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Bank Indonesia Institute
2019
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://irep.iium.edu.my/78399/1/78399_Halal%20governance%20in%20Indonesia.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/78399/ https://jimf-bi.org/index.php/JIMF/article/view/1049/743 https://doi.org/10.21098/jimf.v5i1.1049 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Considering Indonesia’s target to lead halal industry worldwide, the discussion
upon the current practices of halal governance in the country is critical to get into a
comprehensive insight. Several major drawbacks within the previous studies on this
topic is found along the followings. There has never been a study that has specifically
discussed the term of halal governance substantively or comprehensively investigated
the subject matters in Indonesia. Driven by this gap, we set out to review halal
governance practices in Indonesia by employing a qualitative method of documentary.
In doing so, the present paper firstly discusses the substantive materials upon lines
of defense in halal governance that covers the four themes, which the present paper
particularly reviews as the current practices in Indonesia. From the present discussion,
this paper offers the novelty on the explanation of lines of defense in halal governance,
and that of the current practices in Indonesia along with the related issues presently
associated with it. In addition, this paper further delivers the applicable advises for
the improvement of the practices. This study is relevant for the stakeholders of halal
industry including the domestic government agencies, practitioners and academics. |
|---|