Knowledge management readiness index: multiple industries perspective
The objectives of this paper is to validate a common research instrument and a hypothesized research model to measure the readiness of organizational members to involve in Knowledge Management (KM) process in two different sectors; corporate sector and academic sector. Using the theory of reason...
محفوظ في:
| المؤلفون الرئيسيون: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| التنسيق: | Conference or Workshop Item |
| اللغة: | English English |
| منشور في: |
IEEE
2018
|
| الموضوعات: | |
| الوصول للمادة أونلاين: | http://irep.iium.edu.my/68486/7/68486%20Knowledge%20Management%20Readiness%20Index.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/68486/13/68486_Knowledge%20management%20readiness%20index_SCOPUS.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/68486/ https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8567136 |
| الوسوم: |
إضافة وسم
لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!
|
| الملخص: | The objectives of this paper is to validate a
common research instrument and a hypothesized research model
to measure the readiness of organizational members to involve in
Knowledge Management (KM) process in two different sectors;
corporate sector and academic sector. Using the theory of reason
action and the theory of planned behavior a conceptual
theoretical framework was developed and the related previous
works help to operationalize the variables. Data were collected
using a questionnaire from two different sectors; 156 academics
from a Malaysian university and 74 corporate executives who are
working in the IT field in Malaysia. Smartpls3 was used to
analyze the data. Convergent validity was tested through factor
loadings, composite reliability and average variance extracted
while divergent validity was established through discriminant
validity separately for each sector. Most of the items and
variables meet the respective threshold values in both sectors.
The path analysis confirmed that out of seven proposed
hypotheses in this study, four are supported in both sectors; IT
support, Performance Expectancy, and Effort Expectancy
influence KM Intention, in turn, KM Intention influence KM
Behavior. The influence of trust among colleagues on KM
intention was supported only in the academic dataset. The
implications of the findings are discussed at the end of the paper. |
|---|