Primary retrograde intrarenal surgery versus excorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in high risk renal stones
Introduction & Objective: Incidence of urolithiasis is high in our country. Treatment modalities vary depending to the size and location of stone and patient's fitness for invasive treatment. Identifying the most suitable treatment modalities according to patient's clinical characteris...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
2017
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://irep.iium.edu.my/61105/1/J%20Endourology%202017.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/61105/ http://online.liebertpub.com/doi/10.1089/end.2017.29029.abstracts |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Introduction & Objective: Incidence of urolithiasis is high in our country. Treatment modalities vary depending to the size and location of stone and patient's fitness for invasive treatment. Identifying the most suitable treatment modalities according to patient's clinical characteristic is important to get optimum stone clearance with least complication and better cost-benefit.
General Objectives
1. To prove that primary RIRS is more effective than ESWL in treatment of renal stone with suspected failure of ESWL
Specific objectives
1. To show that RIRS has better stone clearance in treatment of renal stone with suspected failure of ESWL
2. To show that RIRS is more cost effective in treatment of renal stone with suspected failure of ESWL
3. To identify factors that favors RIRS than ESWL in treatment of renal stone with suspected failure of ESWL
Materials and Methods: This is a randomized controlled trial done for a period of two years from from August 2014 to July 2016 in Hospital Tengku Ampuan Afzan Kuantan, Pahang, MalaysIa. |
|---|