The introduction of the financial ombudsman scheme as an alternative to dispute resolution in the Islamic financial services industry in Malaysia
With the enactment of the Islamic Financial Services Act 2013 (IFSA 2013) in Malaysia, the dispute resolution landscape has been transformed to reflect more on effective dispute settlement that would ensure consumer protection without prejudicing the interests of the financial service providers. Th...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English English English |
| Published: |
International Islamic University Malaysia
2016
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://irep.iium.edu.my/56584/8/56584_The%20introduction%20of%20the%20financial%20ombudsman%20scheme.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/56584/1/56584_The%20introduction%20of%20the%20financial%20ombudsman%20scheme_WoS.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/56584/9/56584_the%20introduction%20of%20The%20introduction%20of%20the%20financial%20ombudsman_scopus.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/56584/ http://journals.iium.edu.my/shajarah/index.php/shaj/article/view/420 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | With the enactment of the Islamic Financial Services Act 2013 (IFSA 2013) in Malaysia, the dispute resolution landscape has been transformed to reflect more on effective dispute settlement that would ensure consumer protection without prejudicing the interests of the
financial service providers. The Central Bank of Malaysia, as the main regulatory body for the Islamic financial services industry in Malaysia, indicates that the Financial Mediation Bureau (FMB) is in the process of implementing the Financial Ombudsman Scheme (FOS). In analysing this statutory by-product of IFSA 2013, this
paper examines the transformation of FMB as a structured statutory body in resolving Islamic finance disputes. In addition, the dispute resolution structure of FMB under the FOS is evaluated and appreciated. A comparative legal analysis is provided in a separate section by examining the structures of other financial ombudsmen as available in other jurisdictions. The examples are taken from other
financial ombudsmen practices as applied in selected Commonwealth countries, i.e., Ireland, United Kingdom, and Pakistan. |
|---|