Beyond classical meta-analysis: can inadequately reported studies be included?
Classical meta-analysis requires the same data from each clinical trial, thus data-reporting must be of a high-quality. Imputation methods are used to include studies that provide incomplete information on variability and the fixed and random effects of a drug. Regression models can be used to inclu...
محفوظ في:
المؤلفون الرئيسيون: | Roberson, Chris, Nik Idris, Nik Ruzni, Boyle, Peter |
---|---|
التنسيق: | مقال |
اللغة: | English |
منشور في: |
Elsevier Science Limited
2004
|
الموضوعات: | |
الوصول للمادة أونلاين: | http://irep.iium.edu.my/5556/1/DDT_beyond_classical_MA.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/5556/ http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S135964460403274X |
الوسوم: |
إضافة وسم
لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!
|
مواد مشابهة
-
Beyond classical meta-analysis: Can inadequately reported studies be included?
بواسطة: Robertson, Chris, وآخرون
منشور في: (2004) -
A case study on the effect of imputing the missing variability measures in meta analysis
بواسطة: Nik Idris, Nik Ruzni
منشور في: (2007) -
Missing variability in meta-analysis : is imputing always good?
بواسطة: Nik Idris, Nik Ruzni, وآخرون
منشور في: (2006) -
An empirical comparison of meta analysis models for continuous data with missing standard deviations
بواسطة: Nik Idris, Nik Ruzni, وآخرون
منشور في: (2011) -
The effects of imputing the missing standard deviations on the standard error of meta analysis estimates
بواسطة: Nik Idris, Nik Ruzni, وآخرون
منشور في: (2009)