Beyond classical meta-analysis: can inadequately reported studies be included?
Classical meta-analysis requires the same data from each clinical trial, thus data-reporting must be of a high-quality. Imputation methods are used to include studies that provide incomplete information on variability and the fixed and random effects of a drug. Regression models can be used to inclu...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Roberson, Chris, Nik Idris, Nik Ruzni, Boyle, Peter |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier Science Limited
2004
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://irep.iium.edu.my/5556/1/DDT_beyond_classical_MA.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/5556/ http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S135964460403274X |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Beyond classical meta-analysis: Can inadequately reported studies be included?
by: Robertson, Chris, et al.
Published: (2004) -
A case study on the effect of imputing the missing variability measures in meta analysis
by: Nik Idris, Nik Ruzni
Published: (2007) -
Missing variability in meta-analysis : is imputing always good?
by: Nik Idris, Nik Ruzni, et al.
Published: (2006) -
An empirical comparison of meta analysis models for continuous data with missing standard deviations
by: Nik Idris, Nik Ruzni, et al.
Published: (2011) -
The effects of imputing the missing standard deviations on the standard error of meta analysis estimates
by: Nik Idris, Nik Ruzni, et al.
Published: (2009)